Case Law Rathner (Liquidator), in the matter of PE Capital Nominees Pty Ltd (In Liq) v Runner Investment Limited

Rathner (Liquidator), in the matter of PE Capital Nominees Pty Ltd (In Liq) v Runner Investment Limited

Document Cited Authorities (67) Cited in Related
Rathner (Liquidator), in the matter of PE Capital Nominees Pty Ltd (In Liq) v Runner Investment Limited [2023] FCA 754


Federal Court of Australia

Rathner (Liquidator), in the matter of PE Capital Nominees Pty Ltd (In Liq) v Runner Investment Limited [2023] FCA 754

File number(s):

VID 585 of 2021



Judgment of:

MCEVOY J



Date of judgment:

5 July 2023



Catchwords:

MORTGAGES AND SECURITIES – where trustee company legally owned land which was the subject of three registered mortgages – company defaulted and went into liquidation – application by liquidators for orders in relation to trust assets – cross claims in relation to the land by mortgagees – where first mortgagee refused to exercise power of sale under s 77 of the Transfer of Land Act 1958 (Vic) – where second mortgagee sought to exercise the power of sale – where first and third mortgagees contended that the second mortgagee could not exercise the power of sale by reason of the terms of a priority deed – whether first mortgagee could enforce the priority deed to prevent the sale of the land by the second mortgagee – whether first mortgagee had the benefit of the priority deed under a trust – validity of notice of default issued under s 76 of the Transfer of Land Act 1958 (Vic) by second mortgagee – whether first and third mortgagee entitled to discretionary relief – whether second mortgagee could validly exercise power of sale by discharging first mortgage debt from proceeds of sale – when first mortgagee's entitlement to interest ends – whether utility in granting relief – where second mortgagee would have been entitled to relief had the first mortgagee not subsequently disposed of the land



Legislation:

Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 468; Sch 2, s 90-15

Interpretation of Legislation Act 1984 (Vic) s 38

Transfer of Land Act 1958 (Vic) ss 45(2), 76, 77, 90(3), 116A

Trustee Act 1958 (Vic) s 63

Property Law Act 1958 (Vic) ss 18, 50, 56(1), 78, 86, 222

Property Law Act 1969 (WA) s 11(1)

Federal Court (Corporations) Rules 2000 (Cth) r 2.2

Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 16.05(2)

Conveyancing and Law of Property Act 1881 (UK) s 5

Law of Property Act 1925 (UK), s 56(1), 78(1), 205(ix)


Cases cited:

Accordent Pty Ltd and Portellos v Bresimark Nominees Pty Ltd [2008] SASC 196

ASIC v PE Capital Funds [2022] FCA 76

Australia and New Zealand Banking Group v Bangadilly Pastoral Co Pty Ltd (1978) 139 CLR 195

Bahr v Nicolay (No 2) (1988) 164 CLR 604

Barns v Queensland National Bank Ltd (1906) 3 CLR 925

Boensch v Pascoe [2019] HCA 49; 268 CLR 593

Clarke v Burnie City Council [2008] TASSC 75

Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Lee (1966) 22 ACSR 574

Consolidated Trust Co Ltd v Naylor (1936) 55 CLR 423

DBB16 v Commonwealth of Australia [2022] FCA 783

Deguisa v Lynn [2019] SASCFC 107

Equus Financial Services Ltd v RMBL Investments Pty Ltd (1996) 22 ACSR 744

Evans Marshall & Co Ltd v Bertola SA [1973] 1 WLR 349

Fincore v Webb [2020] VSC 831

Fitt v Luxury Developments Pty Ltd [2000] VSC 258

Foran v Wight (1989) 168 CLR 385

Forsyth v Blundell (1973) 129 CLR 477

Gulic v Boral Transport Ltd [2016] NSWCA 269

Gumland Property Holdings Pty Limited v Duffy Bros Fruit Market (Campbelltown) Pty Ltd (2008) 234 CLR 237

Gunn v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [1922] Tas LR 26

Henry Roach (Petroleum) Pty Ltd v Credit House (Vic) Pty Ltd [1976] VR 309

Hensley v Reschke (1914) 18 CLR 452

In the matter of Australian Property Custodian Holdings Limited (in liquidation) (receivers and managers appointed) (as responsible entity of the Prime Retirement Aged Care Property Trust) [2012] NSWSC 679

Jacobson v National Australia Bank (unreported, Supreme Court of Victoria, 15 April 1994)

Jones v Bartlett [2000] HCA 56; (2000) 205 CLR 166

Korda v Australian Executor Trustees (SA) Limited (2015) 255 CLR 62

Kravchenko v The Rock Building Society (2009) 26 VR 400

Massoud v Nationwide News Pty Ltd [2022] NSWCA 150

MBF Investments Pty Ltd v Nolan [2011] VSCA 114

McDonald's Australia Limited v Bendigo and Adelaide Bank Limited and Benalla Retail Investments Pty Ltd [2014] VSCA 209

McLellan v Sharantelli Pty Ltd [2000] VSC 174

Measures v McFadyen (1910) 11 CLR 723

Midland Brick Company Pty Ltd v Welsh [2006] WASC 122; (2006) 32 WAR 287

Netglory Pty Ltd v Caratti [2013] WASC 364

Paciocco v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2015] FCAFC 50; (2015) 236 FCR 199

Partridge v McIntosh & Sons Ltd (1933) 49 CLR 453

Pendlebury v Colonial Mutual Life Assurance Society Ltd (1912) 13 CLR 676

Pethybridge v Stedikas Holdings Pty Ltd [2007] NSWCA 154

Pirie v Registrar-General (1962) 109 CLR 619

Price v Spoor [2021] HCA 20; (2021) 270 CLR 450

Quadramain Pty Ltd v Sevastapol Investments Pty Ltd (1976) 133 CLR 390

Queensland Premier Mines Pty Ltd v French (2007) 235 CLR 81

Re Wily as Liquidator of Anglican Insurance Ltd [2009] NSWSC 696

Services Board v Gillespie-Jones (2013) 249 CLR 493

Simmons v Lee [1998] 2 Qd R 671

Specialist Diagnostic Services Pty Ltd v Healthscope Ltd (2012) 41 VR 1

State Bank of Victoria v Parry and Others (1989) 7 ACLC 226

Tipperary Developments Pty Ltd v Western Australia [2009] WASCA 126; (2009) 38 WAR 488

Toohey v Gunther (1928) 41 CLR 181

Trident General Insurance Co Ltd v McNiece Bros Pty Ltd (1988) 165 CLR 107

Ultimate Property Group Pty Ltd v Lord (2004) 60 NSWLR 646

Westpac Banking Corporation Ltd v Kingsland (1991) 26 NSWLR 700

Whild v GE Mortgage Solutions Pty Ltd [2012] VSC 212

Wilson v Darling Island Stevedoring & Lighterage Co Ltd (1956) 95 CLR 43

Winterton Constructions Pty Ltd v Hambros Australia Limited (1991) 101 ALR 363

Yarrangah Pty Ltd v National Australia Bank Ltd [1999] NSWSC 97



Bank of New South Wales v O’Connor (1889) 14 App Cas 273

Beswick v Beswick [1968] AC 58

Bishop v Church (1751) 2 Ves Sen 371; 28 ER 238

Chelsea and Waltham Green Building Society v Armstrong [1951] 1 Ch 853

Cheltenham and Gloucester plc v Krausz [1997] 1 WLR 1558

Chesterfield and Midland Silkstone Colliery Co (Ltd) v Hawkins (1865) 3 H & C 677

China and South Sea Bank Ltd v Tan Soon Gin (Alias George Tan) [1990] 1 AC 536

Co-operative Insurance v Argyll Stores Ltd [1997] UKHL 17; [1998] AC 1

Devon Nominees Ltd v Hampstead Holdings Ltd [1981] 1 NZLR 477

Downsview Nominees Ltd v First City Corporation Ltd [1993] AC 295

Federated Homes Ltd v Mill Lodge Properties Ltd [1980] 1 WLR 594; (1980) 1 All ER 371

Formby v Barker [1903] 2 Ch 539

Graham v Seal (1918) 88 LJ Ch 31

Gyles v Hall (1726) 2 P Wms 378; 24 ER 774

Hunter v Macklew (1846) 67 ER 902

Harmer v Armstrong [1934] 1 Ch 65

In re Schebsman; Official Receiver v Cargo

James v Rumsey [1879] 11 Ch D 398 Superintendents (London) Ltd [1944] Ch 83

Kaolim Private v United Overseas Land Ltd [1983] 1 WLR 472

London City Council v Allen [1914] 3 KB 642

Lord Midleton v Eliot (1847) 15 Sim 531

Lord Strathcona Steamship Co Ltd v Dominion Coal Co Ltd [1926] AC 108

Manser v Dix (1857) 8 De GM & G 703; 44 ER 561

Noakes v Rice [1902] AC 24

P & A Swift...

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex