Sign Up for Vincent AI
Re B (A Child)
5 cases
Re T (A Child)
"...531; [2011] 3 WLR 388; [2012] 1 All ER 1, SC(E) Attorney General v De Keyser’s Royal Hotel Ltd [1920] AC 508, HL(E) B (A Child), In re [2019] EWCA Civ 2025; [2020] Fam 221; [2020] 2 WLR 568; [2020] 3 All ER 375; [2020] 2 FLR 25, CA Birmingham City Council v D [2019] UKSC 42; [2019] 1 WLR 54..."
Shvidler v Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairsdalston Projects Ltd and Others v Secretary of State for Transport
"...AC 408; [2021] 3 WLR 179; [2021] 4 All ER 985, SC(E) Father, The v Worcestershire County Council [2025] UKSC 1; [2025] 2 WLR 155; [2025] 2 All ER 375, SC(E) Grayan Building Services Ltd, In re [1995] Ch 241; [1995] 3 WLR 1, CA Huang v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] UKHL 1..."
Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council v AM
"... ... The effect of those amendments is, in short, to prohibit the placement of a looked after child under the age of 16 in unregulated accommodation. Within this context, the question of law before the court is whether it remains open to the High Court to authorise, under its inherent jurisdiction, the deprivation of liberty of a child under the age of 16 where the placement in which the ... "
Lancashire County Council v G
"...namely the bare need to prevent G from harming herself. Within this context, I echo the words of the former President in Re X (A Child)(No.3) as I am left acutely conscious of my powerlessness, of my inability to do more for 72 I direct that this judgment shall be sent forthwith to the Chil..."
Try vLex and Vincent AI for free
Start a free trialExperience vLex's unparalleled legal AI
Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
5 cases
Re T (A Child)
"...531; [2011] 3 WLR 388; [2012] 1 All ER 1, SC(E) Attorney General v De Keyser’s Royal Hotel Ltd [1920] AC 508, HL(E) B (A Child), In re [2019] EWCA Civ 2025; [2020] Fam 221; [2020] 2 WLR 568; [2020] 3 All ER 375; [2020] 2 FLR 25, CA Birmingham City Council v D [2019] UKSC 42; [2019] 1 WLR 54..."
Shvidler v Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairsdalston Projects Ltd and Others v Secretary of State for Transport
"...AC 408; [2021] 3 WLR 179; [2021] 4 All ER 985, SC(E) Father, The v Worcestershire County Council [2025] UKSC 1; [2025] 2 WLR 155; [2025] 2 All ER 375, SC(E) Grayan Building Services Ltd, In re [1995] Ch 241; [1995] 3 WLR 1, CA Huang v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] UKHL 1..."
Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council v AM
"... ... The effect of those amendments is, in short, to prohibit the placement of a looked after child under the age of 16 in unregulated accommodation. Within this context, the question of law before the court is whether it remains open to the High Court to authorise, under its inherent jurisdiction, the deprivation of liberty of a child under the age of 16 where the placement in which the ... "
Lancashire County Council v G
"...namely the bare need to prevent G from harming herself. Within this context, I echo the words of the former President in Re X (A Child)(No.3) as I am left acutely conscious of my powerlessness, of my inability to do more for 72 I direct that this judgment shall be sent forthwith to the Chil..."
Try vLex and Vincent AI for free
Start a free trialStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting