Case Law Regents of the Univ. of Cal. v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec.

Regents of the Univ. of Cal. v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec.

Document Cited Authorities (102) Cited in (153) Related (1)

Hashim M. Mooppan (argued), Deputy Assistant Attorney General; Thomas Pulham, Abby C. Wright, and Mark B. Stern, Appellate Staff; Alex G. Tse, Acting United States Attorney; Chad A. Readler, Acting Assistant Attorney General; United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.; for Defendants-Appellants.

Michael J. Mongan (argued), Deputy Solicitor General; Samuel P. Siegel, Associate Deputy Solicitor General; James F. Zahradka II, Deputy Attorney General; Michael L. Newman, Supervising Deputy Attorney General; Edward C. DuMont, Solicitor General; Xavier Becerra, Attorney General; Office of the Attorney General, San Francisco, California; for Plaintiff-Appellee State of California.

Susan P. Herman, Deputy Attorney General; Janet T. Mills, Attorney General; Office of the Attorney General, Augusta, Maine; for Plaintiff-Appellee State of Maine.

Jacob Campion, Assistant Attorney General; Lori Swanson, Attorney General; Office of the Attorney General, St. Paul, Minnesota; for Plaintiff-Appellee State of Minnesota.

Leah J. Tullin, Assistant Attorney General; Steven M. Sullivan, Solicitor General; Brian E. Frosh, Attorney General; Attorney General's Office, Baltimore, Maryland; for Plaintiff-Appellee State of Maryland.

Jeffrey Michael Davidson (argued), Breanna K. Jones, David S. Watnick, Erika Douglas, and Mónica Ramírez Almadani, Covington & Burling LLP, San Francisco, California; Ivano M. Ventresca, Megan A. Crowley, Alexander A. Berengaut, Mark H. Lynch, and Robert A. Long, Covington & Burling LLP, Washington, D.C.; for Plaintiff-Appellee The Regents of the University of California, et al.

Brian Danitz, Tamarah Prevost, and Justin T. Berger, Cotchett Pitre & McCarthy LLP, Burlingame, California, for Plaintiff-Appellee City of San José.

Mark D. Rosenbaum (argued), Malhar Shah, and Judy London, Public Counsel, Los Angeles, California; Haley S. Morrisson, Matthew S. Rozen, and Nicole A. Saharsky, Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Washington, D.C.; Kelsey J. Helland, Jonathan N. Soleimani, Kirsten Galler, Ethan D. Dettmer, and Theodore J. Boutrous Jr., Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Los Angeles, California; Luis Cortes Romera, Barrera Legal Group PLLC, Kent, Washington; Erwin Chemerinsky, Berkeley, California; Laurence H. Tribe, Cambridge, Massachusetts; Leah M. Litman, Irvine, California; for Plaintiffs-Appellees Dulce Garcia, Miriam Gonzalez Avila, Saul Jimenez Suarez, Virdiana Chabolla Mendoza, Norma Ramirez, and Jirayut Latthivongskorn.

Andrew Kushner, Eric P. Brown, and Stacey M. Leyton, Altshuler Berzon LLP, San Francisco, California, for Plaintiff-Appellee County of Santa Clara and Service Employees International Union Local 521.

Marcelo Quiñones, Laura S. Trice, Greta S. Hansen, and James R. Williams, Office of the County Counsel, County of Santa Clara, San Jose, California, for Plaintiff-Appellee County of Santa Clara.

Jessica Levin, Melissa Lee, Lorraine K. Bannai, and Robert S. Chang, Ronald A. Peterson Law Clinic, Seattle University School of Law, Seattle, Washington, for Amici Curiae 42 Historians and the Fred T. Korematsu Center for Law and Equality.

Leo Gertner, Deborah L. Smith, and Nicole G. Berner, Service Employees International Union, Washington, D.C.; Deepak Gupta, Gupta Wessler PLLC, Washington, D.C.; David J. Strom, American Federation of Teachers, Washington, D.C.; Judith Rivlin, American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Washington, D.C.; Patricia M. Shea, Communications Workers of America, Washington, D.C.; Bradley Raymond, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Washington, D.C.; Joseph E. Kolick Jr., International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, Hanover, Maryland; Mario Martínez, Martínez Aguilasocho & Lynch APLC, Bakersfield, California; for Amici Curiae Service Employees International Union; American Federation of Teachers; American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees; Communications Workers of America; International Brotherhood of Teamsters; International Union of Painters and Allied Trades; and United Farm Workers of America.

Geoffrey S. Brounell and Peter Karanjia, Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, Washington, D.C., for Amicus Curiae United We Dream.

Sean Goldhammer, Lubna A, Alam, Jason Walta, Emma Leheny, and Alice O'Brien, National Education Association, Washington, D.C.; Andra M. Donovan, San Diego Unified School District, San Diego, California; Abhas Hajela, Capitol Advisors Group LLC, Sacramento, California; Eric E. Stevens, Girard Edwards Stevens & Tucker LLP, Sacramento, California; Kathryn M. Sheffield, California Faculty Association, Sacramento, California; Glenn Rothner, Rothner Segall & Greenstone, Pasadena, California; D. Michael Ambrose and Elaine M. Yama-Garcia, California School Boards Association Education Legal Alliance, Sacramento, California; Jean Shin and Laura P. Juran, California Teachers Association, Burlingame, California; Vibiana M. Andrade, Los Angeles County Office of Education, Downey, California; Devora Navera Reed and David Holmquist, Los Angeles Unified School District, Los Angeles, California; Sonja H. Trainor and Francisco Negrón, National School Boards Association, Alexandria, Virginia; Michael L. Smith, Oakland Unified School District, Oakland, California; Raoul Bozio, Sacramento City Unified School District, Sacramento, California; for Amici Curiae Public Education Groups.

Caryn C. Lederer, Chirag G. Badlani, and Matthew J. Piers, Hughes Socol Piers Resnick & Dym Ltd., Chicago, Illinois; Daniel B. Rice and Joshua A. Geltzer, Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection, Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, D.C.; for Amici Curiae Current and Former Prosecutors and Law Enforcement Leaders.

Zachary Kolodin, Michael N. Fresco, Adeel A. Mangi, and Steven A. Zalesin, Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP, New York, New York; Juvaria Khan, Sirine Shebaya, and Jonathan Smith, Muslim Advocates, Washington, D.C.; for Amici Curiae 119 Religious Organizations.

Jennifer J. Yun, Ishan Bhabha, Lindsay C. Harrison, and Thomas J. Perrelli, Jenner & Block LLP, Washington, D.C., for Amici Curiae Institutions of Higher Education.

Jennifer B. Sokoler and Anton Metlitsky, O'Melveny & Myers LLP, New York, New York, for Amicus Curiae Eighteen Universities.

Lauren R. Goldman and...

5 cases
Document | U.S. District Court — Northern District of California – 2018
Nat'l Educ. Ass'n v. DeVos
"...standing.2.3 Redressability If the plaintiffs prevail, the court can set aside the Delay Rule. Regents of the Univ. of Cal. v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec. , 908 F.3d 476, 511 (9th Cir. 2018). The Disclosure Rule will go into effect, and the plaintiffs' educational institutions will be requi..."
Document | U.S. District Court — District of Maryland – 2020
Casa De Md., Inc. v. Wolf
"...v. DHS , 279 F. Supp. 3d 1011, 1049 (N.D. Cal. 2018) (quoting Washington v. Trump , 847 F.3d 1151, 1167 (9th Cir. 2017) ), aff'd , 908 F.3d 476 (9th Cir. 2018) ; see also Hawaii v. Trump , 878 F.3d 662, 701 (9th Cir. 2017), rev'd on other grounds , ––– U.S. ––––, 138 S. Ct. 2392, 201 L.Ed.2..."
Document | U.S. District Court — District of Columbia – 2021
Wash. Alliance of Tech. Workers v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec.
"...proceedings against an individual or class of individuals otherwise eligible for removal[,]" Regents of the Univ. of Cal. v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 908 F.3d 476, 487 (9th Cir. 2018), rev'd in part, vacated in part, ––– U.S. ––––, 140 S. Ct. 1891, 207 L.Ed.2d 353 (2020) —to 4.3 million..."
Document | U.S. District Court — Middle District of North Carolina – 2019
Guilford Coll. v. McAleenan
"...v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec. , 279 F. Supp. 3d 1011, 1049 (N.D. Cal. 2018) (quoting Washington , 847 F.3d at 1167 ), aff'd , 908 F.3d 476 (9th Cir. 2018). See Hawaii v. Trump , 878 F.3d 662, 701 (9th Cir. 2017), rev'd on other grounds , ––– U.S. ––––, 138 S. Ct. 2392, 201 L.Ed.2d 775 (201..."
Document | U.S. District Court — Northern District of California – 2019
State v. Azar
"...States Dep't of Homeland Sec. , 279 F. Supp. 3d 1011, 1022, 1045 (N.D. Cal.), aff'd sub nom. Regents of the Univ. of California v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec. , 908 F.3d 476 (9th Cir. 2018) ; Nat'l Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Trump , 315 F. Supp. 3d 457, 473 (D.D.C. 2018)..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial
5 books and journal articles
Document | Vol. 95 Núm. 5, May 2020 – 2020
ONLY WHERE JUSTIFIED: TOWARD LIMITS AND EXPLANATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR NATIONWIDE INJUNCTIONS.
"...(9th Cir. Oct. 12, 2018); Regents of Univ. of Cal. v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 279 F. Supp. 3d 1011, 1049-50 (N.D. Cal. 2018), aff'd, 908 F.3d 476, 520 (9th Cir. 2018), cert. granted, 139 S. Ct. 2779 (2019) (mem.). I count in this number those cases still on the Ninth Circuit's docket d..."
Document | Vol. 32 Núm. 1, January 2021 – 2021
"LAW AND" THE OLC'S ARTICLE II IMMUNITY MEMOS.
"...reviewable if it leads to an abdication of the agency's statutory responsibility); Regents of Univ. Cal. v. U.S. Homeland Secretary, 908 F.3d 476, 507 (9th Cir. 2018) (clarifying that a "general statement of policy" is judicially reviewable where the agency believes it has no authority to d..."
Document | Vol. 169 Núm. 3, February 2021 – 2021
NONCITIZENS' ACCESS TO FEDERAL DISTRICT COURTS: THE NARROWING OF s. 1252(b) (9) POST-JENNINGS.
"...924 rescission F.3d 684, 697 (4th Cir. 2019) Regents of the Univ. 9th Challenging DACA of Cal. v. U.S. Dep't rescission of Homeland Sec, 908 F.3d 476, 504 n.19 (9th Cir. 2018), affd in part 140 S. Ct. 1891, 1907 (2020) Inland Empire-Immigrant 9th Challenging DACA Youth rescission Collective..."
Document | Vol. 130 Núm. 7, May 2021 – 2021
Reasoned Explanation and Political Accountability in the Roberts Court.
"...in the lower-court decisions in all three of the cases before the Court. See Regents of the Univ. of Cal. v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec, 908 F.3d 476, 498-99 (9th Cir. 2018) ("[J]udicial review under these circumstances serves the critical function of promoting accountability within the Exe..."
Document | Vol. 98 Núm. 5, June 2023 – 2023
THE PATH OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REMEDIES.
"...912-13 (7th Cir. 2020); California v. Azar, 911 F.3d 558, 584 (9th Cir. 2018); Regents of the Univ. of Cal. v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec, 908 F.3d 476, 511-12 (9th Cir. 2018), rev'd in part, vacated in part, HOS.Ct. 1891 (2020); District of Columbia v. U.S. Dep't of Agric, 444 F. Supp. 3d ..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial
1 firm's commentaries
Document | JD Supra United States – 2020
Ninth Circuit’s Unanimous Decision in Favor of Empire Health Foundation Vacating Medicare’s 2005 Disproportionate Share Regulation Regarding Unpaid Part A Days is Now Effective
"...further rulemaking, whether retroactive or otherwise. In vacating the policy, the Ninth Circuit cited University of California v. DHS, 908 F.3d 476, 511 (9th Cir. 2018), in which the Ninth Circuit specifically upheld a district court’s nationwide injunction of the Department of Homeland Sec..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 books and journal articles
Document | Vol. 95 Núm. 5, May 2020 – 2020
ONLY WHERE JUSTIFIED: TOWARD LIMITS AND EXPLANATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR NATIONWIDE INJUNCTIONS.
"...(9th Cir. Oct. 12, 2018); Regents of Univ. of Cal. v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 279 F. Supp. 3d 1011, 1049-50 (N.D. Cal. 2018), aff'd, 908 F.3d 476, 520 (9th Cir. 2018), cert. granted, 139 S. Ct. 2779 (2019) (mem.). I count in this number those cases still on the Ninth Circuit's docket d..."
Document | Vol. 32 Núm. 1, January 2021 – 2021
"LAW AND" THE OLC'S ARTICLE II IMMUNITY MEMOS.
"...reviewable if it leads to an abdication of the agency's statutory responsibility); Regents of Univ. Cal. v. U.S. Homeland Secretary, 908 F.3d 476, 507 (9th Cir. 2018) (clarifying that a "general statement of policy" is judicially reviewable where the agency believes it has no authority to d..."
Document | Vol. 169 Núm. 3, February 2021 – 2021
NONCITIZENS' ACCESS TO FEDERAL DISTRICT COURTS: THE NARROWING OF s. 1252(b) (9) POST-JENNINGS.
"...924 rescission F.3d 684, 697 (4th Cir. 2019) Regents of the Univ. 9th Challenging DACA of Cal. v. U.S. Dep't rescission of Homeland Sec, 908 F.3d 476, 504 n.19 (9th Cir. 2018), affd in part 140 S. Ct. 1891, 1907 (2020) Inland Empire-Immigrant 9th Challenging DACA Youth rescission Collective..."
Document | Vol. 130 Núm. 7, May 2021 – 2021
Reasoned Explanation and Political Accountability in the Roberts Court.
"...in the lower-court decisions in all three of the cases before the Court. See Regents of the Univ. of Cal. v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec, 908 F.3d 476, 498-99 (9th Cir. 2018) ("[J]udicial review under these circumstances serves the critical function of promoting accountability within the Exe..."
Document | Vol. 98 Núm. 5, June 2023 – 2023
THE PATH OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REMEDIES.
"...912-13 (7th Cir. 2020); California v. Azar, 911 F.3d 558, 584 (9th Cir. 2018); Regents of the Univ. of Cal. v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec, 908 F.3d 476, 511-12 (9th Cir. 2018), rev'd in part, vacated in part, HOS.Ct. 1891 (2020); District of Columbia v. U.S. Dep't of Agric, 444 F. Supp. 3d ..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
Document | U.S. District Court — Northern District of California – 2018
Nat'l Educ. Ass'n v. DeVos
"...standing.2.3 Redressability If the plaintiffs prevail, the court can set aside the Delay Rule. Regents of the Univ. of Cal. v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec. , 908 F.3d 476, 511 (9th Cir. 2018). The Disclosure Rule will go into effect, and the plaintiffs' educational institutions will be requi..."
Document | U.S. District Court — District of Maryland – 2020
Casa De Md., Inc. v. Wolf
"...v. DHS , 279 F. Supp. 3d 1011, 1049 (N.D. Cal. 2018) (quoting Washington v. Trump , 847 F.3d 1151, 1167 (9th Cir. 2017) ), aff'd , 908 F.3d 476 (9th Cir. 2018) ; see also Hawaii v. Trump , 878 F.3d 662, 701 (9th Cir. 2017), rev'd on other grounds , ––– U.S. ––––, 138 S. Ct. 2392, 201 L.Ed.2..."
Document | U.S. District Court — District of Columbia – 2021
Wash. Alliance of Tech. Workers v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec.
"...proceedings against an individual or class of individuals otherwise eligible for removal[,]" Regents of the Univ. of Cal. v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 908 F.3d 476, 487 (9th Cir. 2018), rev'd in part, vacated in part, ––– U.S. ––––, 140 S. Ct. 1891, 207 L.Ed.2d 353 (2020) —to 4.3 million..."
Document | U.S. District Court — Middle District of North Carolina – 2019
Guilford Coll. v. McAleenan
"...v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec. , 279 F. Supp. 3d 1011, 1049 (N.D. Cal. 2018) (quoting Washington , 847 F.3d at 1167 ), aff'd , 908 F.3d 476 (9th Cir. 2018). See Hawaii v. Trump , 878 F.3d 662, 701 (9th Cir. 2017), rev'd on other grounds , ––– U.S. ––––, 138 S. Ct. 2392, 201 L.Ed.2d 775 (201..."
Document | U.S. District Court — Northern District of California – 2019
State v. Azar
"...States Dep't of Homeland Sec. , 279 F. Supp. 3d 1011, 1022, 1045 (N.D. Cal.), aff'd sub nom. Regents of the Univ. of California v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec. , 908 F.3d 476 (9th Cir. 2018) ; Nat'l Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Trump , 315 F. Supp. 3d 457, 473 (D.D.C. 2018)..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
1 firm's commentaries
Document | JD Supra United States – 2020
Ninth Circuit’s Unanimous Decision in Favor of Empire Health Foundation Vacating Medicare’s 2005 Disproportionate Share Regulation Regarding Unpaid Part A Days is Now Effective
"...further rulemaking, whether retroactive or otherwise. In vacating the policy, the Ninth Circuit cited University of California v. DHS, 908 F.3d 476, 511 (9th Cir. 2018), in which the Ninth Circuit specifically upheld a district court’s nationwide injunction of the Department of Homeland Sec..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial