Case Law Reservation Operations Ctr. v. Payne Fin. Grp.

Reservation Operations Ctr. v. Payne Fin. Grp.

Document Cited Authorities (1) Cited in Related

Submitted on Briefs: October 2, 2024.

APPEAL FROM: District Court of the Eleventh Judicial District, In and For the County of Flathead, Cause No. DV-15-1028-NE Honorable Robert B. Allison, Presiding Judge.

COUNSEL OF RECORD:

For Appellant and Cross-Appellee: Carey Schmidt, David C Berkoff, Schmidt Berkorff, PLLC, Missoula, Montana.

For Appellee and Cross-Appellant State of Montana Commissioner of Securities and Insurance: Maxon R. Davis, Davis, Hatley Haffeman & Tighe, P.C., Great Falls, Montana.

For Appellees Payne Financial and PayneWest Insurance: Scott M Steans, Thomas J. Leonard, Boone Karlberg, P.C., Missoula, Montana.

OPINION

Ingrid Gustafson, Justice.

¶1 Pursuant to Section I, Paragraph 3(c), Montana Supreme Court Internal Operating Rules, this case is decided by memorandum opinion and shall not be cited and does not serve as precedent. Its case title, cause number, and disposition shall be included in this Court's quarterly list of noncitable cases published in the Pacific Reporter and Montana Reports.

¶2 Reservation Operations Center, LLC, a Montana Limited Liability Company, d/b/a National Parks Reservations (NPR) appeals from the January 30, 2024 Order on Motion for Trial Setting and Status Conference issued by the Eleventh Judicial District Court, Flathead County, dismissing NPR's case for failure to prosecute. We affirm.

¶3 This case commenced almost a decade ago when NPR filed its lawsuit on November 6, 2015, against Scottsdale Insurance Company, Payne Financial Group and PayneWest Insurance, Inc.,[1] for NPR's lack of insurance to defend and indemnify itself for a sexual discrimination claim brought by a former NPR employee in 2015. As the case proceeded, NPR obtained a default judgment against Scottsdale in the amount of $515,758.02 in compensatory damages and $4,641,822.18 in punitive damages. Upon appeal, this Court reversed and remanded the case for further proceedings. Rsrv. Operations Ctr., LLC, v. Scottsdale Ins. Co., 2018 MT 128, ¶ 24, 391 Mont. 383, 419 P.3d 121. After remittitur, NPR amended its complaint to add a single cause of action against the State of Montana Commissioner of Securities and Insurance (State) for negligent violation of its statutory duty to serve Scottsdale and later amended its complaint again to add two additional causes against the State for breach of contract and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. Scottsdale eventually settled with NPR and the remaining case against the State plodded along with the court issuing scheduling orders and the parties seeking several amendments thereto. On December 21, 2020, the District Court issued its Order Setting Motions Deadline and Trial Setting, explicitly stating:

Given that the parties and counsel have again requested a new trial setting, and given their ongoing struggles to get the case ready for trial, the [c]ourt is not inclined to give further trial dates. The [c]ourt is not a case-management device. When counsel advise, in writing and accompanied by a completed and signed pretrial order, that they have completed discovery, that all pending motions have been addressed and resolved, and that nothing remains to be done other than to have a trial, the [c]ourt will then, and only then, schedule same at the [c]ourt's convenience.

¶4 Nearly a year and a half later, in response to motions filed, the District Court issued rulings with regard to experts and summary judgment in May 2021. A year after that, the parties participated in a mediation on May 11, 2022. On October 20, 2023, the District Court issued its Notice of Failure to Prosecute and Intent to Dismiss in which it stated, "[a] review of the record shows that there has been no substantive activity in this action for a period of more than two (2) years and no stay has been issued or approved by the [c]ourt. The inactivity in the case is not attributable to the [c]ourt. Plaintiff has failed to prosecute this action." The court advised the parties that, absent a substantive pleading or other activity on or before December 20, 2023, the case would be dismissed without prejudice. NPR did not contest the District Court's finding of inactivity or its conclusion that NPR had failed to prosecute the case. Nor did NPR comply with the December 21, 2020 Order, which required written advisement, accompanied by a completed and signed pretrial order, certifying the completion of discovery and the resolution of all pending motions. Instead, NPR waited until December 19, 2023, 59 days after the District Court's Notice of Failure to Prosecute, to file a Motion for Trial Setting and Status Conference. On January 3, 2024, the District Court denied the motion and dismissed the cause, proclaiming, "[n]ine years of madness ends today." NPR now appeals from this dismissal. The Payne defendants settled following the mandatory appellate mediation, leaving only NPR and the State in this cause.

¶5 NPR argues the District Court erred in dismissing its case under § 25-1-104, MCA, asserting that the dismissal occurred before the expiration of two years of inactivity and that its pleading was filed within the court's 60-day deadline.

¶6 The parties present conflicting standards of review. NPR contends that the District Court's interpretation...

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex