Sign Up for Vincent AI
Rose v. Comm'r of Corr.
Vishal K. Garg, assigned counsel, West Hartford, in support of the petition.
Melissa L. Streeto, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.
The petitioner Steven W. Rose's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 202 Conn. App. 436, ––– A.3d –––– (2021), is granted, limited to the following issues:
1 cases
Rose v. Comm'r of Corr.
"...did not establish good cause necessary to excuse the delay in filing under ... § 52-470 (e) ...." Rose v. Commissioner of Correction , 336 Conn. 920, 920–21, 246 A.3d 1 (2021). 5 The petitioner claims that the habeas court incorrectly concluded that good cause did not exist to excuse the la..."
Try vLex and Vincent AI for free
Start a free trialExperience vLex's unparalleled legal AI
Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
1 cases
Rose v. Comm'r of Corr.
"...did not establish good cause necessary to excuse the delay in filing under ... § 52-470 (e) ...." Rose v. Commissioner of Correction , 336 Conn. 920, 920–21, 246 A.3d 1 (2021). 5 The petitioner claims that the habeas court incorrectly concluded that good cause did not exist to excuse the la..."
Try vLex and Vincent AI for free
Start a free trialStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting