Case Law Selective Ins. Co. of N.Y. v. St. Catherine's Ctr. for Children

Selective Ins. Co. of N.Y. v. St. Catherine's Ctr. for Children

Document Cited Authorities (20) Cited in (2) Related

McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP, (Michael J. Marone and Eric G. Siegel, of counsel), Brookfield Place, 225 Liberty Street, 36th Floor, New York, New York 10281, Attorneys for Plaintiffs.

DuCharme, Clark & Sovern, LLP, (Cheryl L. Sovern and John W. Clark, of counsel), 10 Maxwell Drive, Suite 205, Clifton Park, New York 12065, Attorneys for St. Catherine's Center for Children.

Sovern Law, PLLC, (Cheryl L. Sovern, of counsel), 100 Saratoga Village Boulevard, Building 37, Suite 37L, Malta, New York 12020, Attorneys for St. Catherine's Center for Children.

Richard M. Platkin, J.

This is an action brought by plaintiffs Selective Insurance Company of New York and Selective Insurance Company of South Carolina (collectively, "Selective") for, among other things, rescission of an insurance policy issued to defendant St. Catherine's Center for Children ("St. Catherine's") that provided abuse and molestation coverage, including prior acts coverage. Selective alleges that St. Catherine's materially misrepresented and fraudulently concealed allegations of abuse and molestation by its employees when applying for this coverage.

Discovery is complete, and a trial-term note of issue has been filed. Selective now moves pursuant to CPLR 3212 for an order: (1) rescinding and declaring void ab initio the abuse and molestation coverage written for St. Catherine's, including the prior acts endorsement; (2) determining that St. Catherine's engaged in, and is liable for, common-law fraud; (3) declaring that Selective does not have a duty to defend or indemnify St. Catherine's in an underlying action for sexual molestation that is pending in this Court; and (4) dismissing St. Catherine's counterclaim for declaratory relief. St. Catherine's opposes Selective's motion and cross-moves pursuant to CPLR 3212 for the summary dismissal of plaintiffs' complaint and a declaration that Selective is obliged to defend and indemnify St. Catherine's in the underlying action.

BACKGROUND

St. Catherine's is a social services organization located in Albany, New York that provides services to children and their families. Among other programs, St. Catherine's operates a day treatment program that serves elementary school students with behavioral and special needs that cannot be met in a traditional school setting.

A. The Policy

Selective issued a commercial insurance policy to St. Catherine's ("Policy") on June 21, 2016 that provided prospective coverage for abuse and molestation claims (see NYSCEF Doc No. 2 ["Complaint"], ¶¶ 5-7).

St. Catherine's applied for the Policy through its independent agent, Rose & Kiernan ("R & K") (see id. , ¶ 6). As part of the application process, R & K submitted to Selective, on March 1, 2016, an application entitled "HUMAN SERVICES — COMPREHENSIVE APPLICATION" (NYSCEF Doc No. 55 ["Application"] ). In Section VI of the Application, entitled "Abuse and Molestation," St. Catherine's represented that it carried abuse and molestation coverage from a different carrier (id. , p. 5). St. Catherine's then answered "no" to Question 12, which asked whether "any incidents resulted in an allegation of sexual abuse" (id. ).

Sean Leary is a Selective underwriter who was involved in issuing the Policy. On June 23, 2016, he spoke with R & K regarding "a potential need for abuse or molestation prior acts coverage for St. Catherine's because [its] insurance program was going to switch from a claims made coverage to occurrence based coverage" (NYSCEF Doc No. 53 ["Leary Aff."], ¶ 10). On the same date, Leary contacted Nancy Adams of Selective to inquire whether the insurer was authorized to write prior acts coverage in New York (see id. , ¶ 11), noting that the underwriting guidelines did not authorize this type of coverage (see id. , ¶¶ 12-17). Adams ultimately advised Leary that Selective could issue prior acts coverage under limited circumstances, but cautioned that "[i]f the insured has any incidents that they are aware [of,] [Selective] should not provide [the retroactive coverage for] prior acts" (NYSCEF Doc. 57, p. 4).

On July 8, 2016, R & K informed Leary that St. Catherine's did not require prior acts coverage, as "[i]t is being picked up on the prior policy" (id. , p. 3). Leary understood this to mean that St. Catherine's had secured a supplemental extended reporting period ("SERP") from the prior carrier (see Leary Aff., ¶ 20).1 Based on the information received from R & K and the representations made by St. Catherine's, Selective issued the Policy on July 15, 2016 (see id. , ¶ 21; NYSCEF Doc No. 59 ["Policy"] ).2

B. The Prior Acts Endorsement

R & K advised Leary on August 31, 2016 that St. Catherine's did, in fact, require prior acts coverage for abuse and molestation dating back to 2009 (see Leary Aff., ¶ 22; NYSCEF Doc No. 60). "Because Selective did not underwrite prior acts abuse or molestation coverage in any state, including New York, Selective determined that the only way to accommodate St. Catherine's request was to create a manuscript endorsement to be approved through the New York Free Trade Zone" (Leary Aff., ¶ 23).

Prior to agreeing to extend retroactive coverage, Selective requested additional information from St. Catherine's. In this connection, Christopher Greagan of R & K wrote to Leslie Siegard, the chief financial officer of St. Catherine's, on September 22, 2016 to advise of the "need to document to Selective that [St. Catherine's] did not have any Sexual Misconduct claims from 9/1/2009 to the present" (NYSCEF Doc No. 78). On September 23, 2016, Siegard gave the following certification on behalf of St. Catherine's: "I certify that there have been no losses, accidents, violations or circumstances that might give rise to a sexual misconduct claim under the [prior] insurance policy ...from 12:01 am on 09/01/2009 to present" (NYSCEF Doc No. 79 ["Statement of No Loss"] [capitalization omitted, emphasis added] ).

John Willenborg, the senior Selective manager involved in underwriting the prior acts endorsement, emailed R & K on November 30, 2016 to further discuss the requested coverage, which is said to be of a type that Selective did not write anywhere in the United States (see NYSCEF Doc No. 64 ["Willenborg Aff."], ¶ 5; NYSCEF Doc No. 66). The process of drafting the custom "manuscript endorsement" for approval by the New York Free Trade Zone was complex and continued into the first quarter of 2017 (Willenborg Aff., ¶ 7).

On March 10, 2017, Willenborg received additional information from R & K regarding the scope of risks involved in writing the prior acts coverage (see id. , ¶ 8). Specifically, the communication confirmed that clergy members did not provide direct care or services at St. Catherine's (see id. , ¶ 9; NYSCEF Doc No. 67). However, "[a]s a result of Selective's ongoing concerns regarding not only reported claims, but also the significant risk for events or allegations occurring between 2009 and 2016 that could lead to future claims or lawsuits, Selective required St. Catherine's to execute a more detailed certification of no known loss or potential loss" (Willenborg Aff., ¶ 10; see NYSCEF Doc No. 68).

On March 20, 2017, Willenborg informed R & K that Selective required a supplemental signed letter of no loss (see Willenborg Aff., ¶ 13). The precise language required by the insurer was sent to R & K on March 22, 2017 (see NYSCEF Doc Nos. 68, 70), and the executed certification (see NYSCEF Doc No. 71 ["No-Loss Letter"] ) was returned to Selective on March 27, 2017.

The No-Loss Letter, which appears on the letterhead of St. Catherine's and is signed by its executive director, Frank Pindiak, reads, in pertinent part:

As you know, after the inception of the Policy, we requested that Selective provide "sexual misconduct" prior acts coverage ... for the period from September 2009 through the inception date of the Policy. I understand that Selective has agreed to issue this coverage, conditioned upon receipt of the following certification from St. Catherine[']s.
On behalf of St. Catherine[']s, I hereby represent that St. Catherine[']s made a due diligence inquiry into whether there are any (i) claims, actions, lawsuits or demands for which St. Catherine[']s or a third party may potentially seek coverage under the Policy; and/or (ii) facts, events, actions, inactions or circumstances that may lead to claims, actions, lawsuits or demands for which St. Catherine[']s or a third party may potentially seek coverage under the Policy.
Based upon this due diligence inquiry, as of the date of this letter, St. Catherine's is not aware of any (i) claims, actions, lawsuits or demands for which St. Catherine's or a third party may potentially
seek coverage under the Policy, or (ii) facts, events, actions, inactions or circumstances that may lead to claims, actions, lawsuits or demands for which St. Catherine's or a third party may potentially seek coverage under the Policy.
St. Catherine's acknowledges that the statements and representations made to Selective in this communication are material to Selective's decision to issue the Policy, with the requested "prior acts" St Catherine's further acknowledges that Selective reserves all rights to rescind the Policy, whether in whole or in part, based on its discovery of contrary information (id. , pp. 1-2).

On May 24, 2017, Willenborg informed R & K that Selective's regulator had approved the language of the manuscript endorsement (see Willenborg Aff., ¶ 18). Based on the information provided by St. Catherine's, including the Statement of No Loss dated September 23, 2016 and the No-Loss Letter dated March...

1 cases
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2020
Monto v. Zeigler
"..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial
1 books and journal articles
Document | Trial Objections – 2022
Frequent Evidentiary Battles
"...admissible in fraud cases to show the absence of mistake. NEW YORK Selective Ins. Co. of New York v. St. Catherine’s Ctr. for Child. , 67 Misc. 3d 339, 123 N.Y.S.3d 396 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2019). Misrepresentations made by the insured, a social services organization, in applying for a liability ..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
1 books and journal articles
Document | Trial Objections – 2022
Frequent Evidentiary Battles
"...admissible in fraud cases to show the absence of mistake. NEW YORK Selective Ins. Co. of New York v. St. Catherine’s Ctr. for Child. , 67 Misc. 3d 339, 123 N.Y.S.3d 396 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2019). Misrepresentations made by the insured, a social services organization, in applying for a liability ..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
1 cases
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2020
Monto v. Zeigler
"..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex