Sign Up for Vincent AI
Spady v Spady Estate, 2022 ABQB 591
5 cases
Astolfi v Stone Creek Resorts Inc.,
"...for the purposes of questions in the context of applications, but they do for Part 5 questioning for discovery. In Spady v Spady Estate, 2022 ABQB 591, at paras 36–37, I addressed a similar gap in the Rules for the question of what is “relevant and material” in the context of an application..."
O'Reilly v O'Reilly,
"...appeal denied (2005), 336 NR 198n (SCC); Stochinsky v Chetner (Estate of), 2003 ABCA 226, para 29, [2004] 3 WWR 54; Spady v Spady Estate, 2022 ABQB 591, para 50. 99 The corroboration evidence must be more than “suspicion, innuendo and speculation”: Logan Estate (Re), 2021 ABCA 6 at paras 17..."
Lesenko v Wild Rose Ready Mix Ltd,
"...in part, in the efficient use of judicial resources. 65 Marion J, on a summary judgment appeal from a Master in Spady v Spady Estate, 2022 ABQB 591 lamented the practice of de novo review at para 41: [Parties] go through the motions, so to speak, and hope for the best before the master on t..."
Armstrong v Gula,
"...by Forbes' direct testimony (and vice versa) under the Alberta Evidence Act, RSA 2000, c A-18 ( AEA), section 11: Spady v Spady Estate, 2022 ABQB 591 at paras 46-50. Forbes' notes indicate that Gula told Forbes he had no intention of selling the Lands, that he thought he was signing documen..."
Garbera Estate,
"...(ONCA); Murphy Estate v McLean Estate, 1992 ABCA 240, paras 30-31, 96 DLR (4th) 535. Justice Marion elaborated in Spady v Spady Estate, 2022 ABQB 591 at paras 48 and 49: [48] The corroboration evidence must be more than “suspicion, innuendo and speculation”, but on the other hand the law do..."
Try vLex and Vincent AI for free
Start a free trialExperience vLex's unparalleled legal AI
Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
5 cases
Astolfi v Stone Creek Resorts Inc.,
"...for the purposes of questions in the context of applications, but they do for Part 5 questioning for discovery. In Spady v Spady Estate, 2022 ABQB 591, at paras 36–37, I addressed a similar gap in the Rules for the question of what is “relevant and material” in the context of an application..."
O'Reilly v O'Reilly,
"...appeal denied (2005), 336 NR 198n (SCC); Stochinsky v Chetner (Estate of), 2003 ABCA 226, para 29, [2004] 3 WWR 54; Spady v Spady Estate, 2022 ABQB 591, para 50. 99 The corroboration evidence must be more than “suspicion, innuendo and speculation”: Logan Estate (Re), 2021 ABCA 6 at paras 17..."
Lesenko v Wild Rose Ready Mix Ltd,
"...in part, in the efficient use of judicial resources. 65 Marion J, on a summary judgment appeal from a Master in Spady v Spady Estate, 2022 ABQB 591 lamented the practice of de novo review at para 41: [Parties] go through the motions, so to speak, and hope for the best before the master on t..."
Armstrong v Gula,
"...by Forbes' direct testimony (and vice versa) under the Alberta Evidence Act, RSA 2000, c A-18 ( AEA), section 11: Spady v Spady Estate, 2022 ABQB 591 at paras 46-50. Forbes' notes indicate that Gula told Forbes he had no intention of selling the Lands, that he thought he was signing documen..."
Garbera Estate,
"...(ONCA); Murphy Estate v McLean Estate, 1992 ABCA 240, paras 30-31, 96 DLR (4th) 535. Justice Marion elaborated in Spady v Spady Estate, 2022 ABQB 591 at paras 48 and 49: [48] The corroboration evidence must be more than “suspicion, innuendo and speculation”, but on the other hand the law do..."
Try vLex and Vincent AI for free
Start a free trialStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting