Case Law Sparks v. State, S-18-0181

Sparks v. State, S-18-0181

Document Cited Authorities (17) Cited in (11) Related

Representing Appellant: Office of the State Public Defender: Diane Lozano, Wyoming State Public Defender; Kirk A. Morgan, Chief Appellate Counsel; Lauren McLane, Faculty Director, and Alex N. Cremer, Student Intern, of the Defender Aid Clinic, University of Wyoming College of Law. Argument by Mr. Cremer.

Representing Appellee: Peter K. Michael, Wyoming Attorney General; Christyne M. Martens, Deputy Attorney General; Russell Farr, Assistant Attorney General. Argument by Mr. Farr.

Before DAVIS, C.J., and FOX, KAUTZ, BOOMGAARDEN, and GRAY, JJ.

DAVIS, Chief Justice.

[¶1] Ian Sparks was convicted of furnishing two fifteen-year-old girls with alcohol and sexually abusing them. On appeal, he contends that the district court erred in ordering joinder of the sexual abuse charges relating to the two victims. He further contends that the district court erred and violated his confrontation rights and the right to a complete defense when it excluded evidence of a prior false sexual abuse allegation by one of the victims. We affirm.

ISSUES

[¶2] Mr. Sparks presents two issues on appeal, which we restate as follows:

I. Did the district court abuse its discretion in ordering joinder of the sexual abuse charges relating to the two victims?
II. Did the district court abuse its discretion or infringe on Mr. Sparks’ confrontation rights or his right to present a complete defense when it excluded evidence of a prior false sexual abuse allegation by one of the victims?
FACTS

[¶3] In the summer of 2016, DJJ and AK were both fifteen years old and living in Gillette, Wyoming. They had become friends during their participation in Civil Air Patrol that summer, and on July 23, 2016, they made plans for AK to spend the night at DJJ’s home. Their plans changed, however, and they instead decided to spend the night with DJJ’s former step-sister, Mikelah Williams, and her twenty-three-year old fiancé, Ian Sparks. Mr. Sparks and Ms. Williams had recently moved, so DJJ and AK first went to the apartment they had vacated to assist Mr. Sparks in cleaning it. Afterward, Mr. Sparks drove the girls to the new trailer home he shared with Ms. Williams, stopping along the way to buy vodka, energy drinks, and soda for himself and the girls.

[¶4] It was around 10:00 p.m. when Mr. Sparks and the girls arrived at the trailer he shared with Ms. Williams. He left the vodka in his vehicle and told the girls that because Ms. Williams would be upset about the alcohol, they would wait until she went to sleep to drink it. While the girls watched a movie, Mr. Sparks and Ms. Williams retired to their bedroom. Sometime later, Mr. Sparks came out of the bedroom and told the girls Ms. Williams had finally fallen asleep.

[¶5] Mr. Sparks and the girls then left the mobile home and took the vodka and other drinks to a nearby abandoned trailer. There they passed the vodka around and drank from the bottle. Although AK raised the bottle to her mouth and could taste the alcohol, she only pretended to drink it. DJJ, on the other hand, drank to the point of intoxication. As the three drank, they played a game of "Truth or Dare." AK described how the evening then progressed:

Q. Truth or Dare, how did it start? In what sort of things?
A. Um, so just something stupid, like you have to lick a wall, or stuff like that.
Q. And did there come a time where the game got a little more risqué?
A. Yes.
Q. What did you – can you tell us about that?
A. I think it started daring each other, like kiss each other.
Q. And did there come a point where you and Mr. Sparks got dared to make out?
A. Yes.
Q. Can you tell us about that?
A. [DJJ] dared us to kiss, so we kissed.
Q. Okay. Did you want to follow through with that dare?
A. No.
Q. Why did you?
A. Because I was just playing along and trying to have fun, seem like if I didn’t.
Q. When you and Mr. Sparks kissed, were you sitting, or were you standing, or something else?
A. We were sitting.
Q. Okay. And how were you sitting?
A. Like on our knees.
Q. So face-to-face?
A. Yes.
Q. So after – well, how long do you think the kiss with Mr. Sparks lasted?
A. A minute or two.
Q. Okay. Was there any touching at that point?
A. Yes.
Q. What kind of touching?
A. Like my butt and – yeah.
Q. I’m sorry? Your butt and?
A. Um, like my back and my arms.
Q. Okay. Now, after Mr. Sparks kisses you, what happens next?
A. Him and [DJJ] kiss. And then he dares me to kiss him again.
Q. Okay. Now when you see him and [DJJ] kiss, was that the first time that you had seen them kiss?
A. Yes.
Q. Okay. What can you tell us about that kiss?
A. It lasted like a minute, same with touching.
Q. Okay. Did you see Mr. Sparks and [DJJ] kiss again later that night?
A. Yes.
Q. Okay. Now let’s talk about that. When you saw Mr. Sparks and [DJJ] kissing again later, what can you tell us about that?
A. Um, it was very – they were very into it. It lasted a while.
Q. Did they both appear to be sort of getting into it?
A. Yes.
Q. Okay. Was Mr. Sparks touching [DJJ]?
A. Yes.
Q. Where?
A. Everywhere.
Q. And I’m sorry, when you say "everywhere" can you be a little more specific?
A. Yes. Her torso, her breasts, butt, and stuff between her legs.
Q. Her torso, her breasts, her rear end, and between her legs?
A. Yes.
Q. Did you say anything to him at that point?
A. Yeah. I told them that they needed to cool it down.
Q. Why?
A. Because she was really drunk, she didn’t know what she was doing, and she probably would have been willing to do anything at that point.
Q. And did Mr. Sparks say anything to you?
A. Yes.
Q. What did he say?
A. He told me that we should let [DJJ] decide what she wanted.
Q. Now, you gave an interview with an officer, a female officer; do you remember that?
A. Yes.
Q. Okay. And in talking with Nicole Long, do you remember indicating that the exact thing that Mr. Sparks said was, "it’s up to [DJJ] if she wants to have sex or not."
A. Yes.
Q. Is that what Mr. Sparks said?
A. Yes.
Q. Now, how were [DJJ] and Mr. Sparks when they were getting into it? Were they standing? Were they sitting?
A. They were, like, lying down.
Q. Okay. Now, you indicated that you saw Mr. Sparks touch [DJJ] between her legs; is that right?
A. Yes.
Q. Did you see Mr. Sparks touch anyone else between their legs that night?
A. Yes.
Q. Okay. Who?
A. Me.
Q. What can you tell us about that?
A. It was after I had, like, tried leaving. But – I don’t remember if I tried leaving before or after, but he had gotten up and he was, um, asking why I wasn’t happy, and said "I could make you happy." And telling me to stay, and let’s go have fun. And he was touching me while doing it, and – yeah.
Q. Okay. When he was saying these things, were you guys standing or sitting?
A. Standing.
Q. Okay. Were you face-to-face or something else?
A. Something else.
Q. Okay. And what was that something else?
A. He was faced towards my back.
Q. Okay. So his front would have been touching your back?
A. Yes.
Q. Okay. And had he wrapped his arms around you?
A. Yes.
Q. Okay. And where – well, what part of his body was touching what part of your body?
A. So his torso to my back, his legs to the back of my legs.
Q. Did his hands touch you anywhere?
A. Yes.
Q. Where?
A. My breasts, my rear end, between my legs.
Q. Now, when you say between your legs, do you mean your vagina?
A. Yes.
Q. Okay. And was this over your clothing or under your clothing?
A. Over.
Q. Was he talking into your ear, or was he just talking normal?
A. In my ear.
Q. He said that he could make you happy?
A. Yes.
Q. How did that make you feel?
A. Gross.

[¶6] A short time later, the three left the abandoned trailer and returned to Mr. Sparks’ trailer home. The next morning, AK and DJJ went to a pancake breakfast and then on to DJJ’s home. While she was there, Mr. Sparks contacted DJJ and asked her to help him finish cleaning his apartment. DJJ agreed and invited AK to join her, but AK declined. At the apartment, then, only DJJ and Mr. Sparks were present. DJJ described what happened after they started cleaning:

Q. He asked if you remembered what happened last night?
A. Yes.
Q. And what did you take that – what did you take that to mean he was talking about?
A. The drinking.
Q. Okay. And what happened after he asked you that?
A. I had said yes. And then he kept on, like, moving closer. And then I had turned my head and he was like right there, like kind of like really, like, on my shoulder. And then he had kissed me.
Q. Was – well, did you kiss him back?
A. Yes.
Q. Okay. Did he touch you at all –
A. Yes.
Q. -- while you guys were kissing?
A. Yes.
Q. Tell us about that, please.
A. He touched me, like on my breasts and like on my stomach, and on my legs.
Q. And at first was that over the clothes?
A. Yes.
Q. When you say that he was touching your legs, do you mean between your legs, or on your legs?
A. On my legs and between my legs.
Q. Now, so it started with kissing and some touching over your clothes. Did it stop there?
A. No.
Q. Okay. What happened next?
A. He had started to undress me, and I had started to undress him.
Q. Okay. And did you take off – or did you guys take off all of your clothes?
A. No.
Q. What did you leave on?
A. My bra.
Q. Okay. Did Mr. Sparks get fully undressed?
A. Yes.
Q. Okay. What happened after you both got undressed?
A. We had sex.
Q. When you say that you had sex, did Mr. Sparks put his penis inside your vagina?
A. Yes.

[¶7] About a week later, DJJ attended a Bible camp outside Lander, Wyoming. While there, she told friends what had happened with Mr. Sparks, and those friends encouraged her to tell her mother. She also told the camp director what had happened, and when her mother picked her up from camp, she reported the incidents to her. When they returned to Gillette, DJJ’s mother took her to the police department to report the incidents. In addition to the acts described above, DJJ reported two additional incidents of sexual intercourse with Mr. Sparks in the week following the July 23rd incident.

[¶8] Following an investigation, the State filed...

5 cases
Document | Wyoming Supreme Court – 2019
Ellis v. Wyoming Dep't of Family Servs. (In re Termination of Parental Rights to LDB)
"... ... STATE OF WYOMING, DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY SERVICES, Appellee (Petitioner). S-19-0050 SUPREME COURT, STATE OF ... reasonably conclude as it did, and whether it acted in an arbitrary and capricious manner." Sparks v ... State , 2019 WY 50, ¶ 34, 440 P.3d 1095, 1106 (Wyo. 2019) (quoting Moser v ... State , 2018 ... "
Document | Wyoming Supreme Court – 2021
Jontra Holdings Pty Ltd. v. Gas Sensing Tech. Corp.
"... ... S-20-0072 S-20-0073 SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING OCTOBER TERM, A.D. 2020 January 29, 2021 Appeal from the District Court of Albany ... 2017)). Matter of LDB , 2019 WY 127, ¶ 43, 454 P.3d 908, 921 (Wyo. 2019) (quoting Sparks v ... State , 2019 WY 50, ¶ 34, 440 P.3d 1095, 1106 (Wyo. 2019)). [¶59] The district court found ... "
Document | Wyoming Supreme Court – 2024
Keller v. State
"... ... right secured by the Confrontation Clause … is the right of cross-examination." Tamblyn , 2020 WY 76, ¶ 47, 465 P.3d at 452 (quoting Sparks v ... State , 2019 WY 50, ¶ 41, 440 P.3d 1095, 1108 (Wyo. 2019)); Pennsylvania v ... Ritchie , 480 U.S. 39, 53, 107 S. Ct. 989, 999, 94 L. Ed. 2d 40 ... "
Document | Wyoming Supreme Court – 2019
Herrera v. State
"... ... 2019) (noting plain error standard applies when appellant demonstrates trial court’s actions may have impacted fundamental rights); Sparks v. State , 2019 WY 50, ¶ 39, 440 P.3d 1095, 1108 (Wyo. 2019) (citing Anderson v. State , 2014 WY 13, ¶ 20, 317 P.3d 1108, 1115 (Wyo. 2014) ) ... "
Document | Wyoming Supreme Court – 2020
Tamblyn v. State
"... ... confront a witness arises under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I, Section 10 of the Wyoming Constitution." Sparks v. State , 2019 WY 50, ¶ 41, 440 P.3d 1095, 1108 (Wyo. 2019). "The primary right secured by the Confrontation Clause of the United States and ... "

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
Document | Wyoming Supreme Court – 2019
Ellis v. Wyoming Dep't of Family Servs. (In re Termination of Parental Rights to LDB)
"... ... STATE OF WYOMING, DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY SERVICES, Appellee (Petitioner). S-19-0050 SUPREME COURT, STATE OF ... reasonably conclude as it did, and whether it acted in an arbitrary and capricious manner." Sparks v ... State , 2019 WY 50, ¶ 34, 440 P.3d 1095, 1106 (Wyo. 2019) (quoting Moser v ... State , 2018 ... "
Document | Wyoming Supreme Court – 2021
Jontra Holdings Pty Ltd. v. Gas Sensing Tech. Corp.
"... ... S-20-0072 S-20-0073 SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING OCTOBER TERM, A.D. 2020 January 29, 2021 Appeal from the District Court of Albany ... 2017)). Matter of LDB , 2019 WY 127, ¶ 43, 454 P.3d 908, 921 (Wyo. 2019) (quoting Sparks v ... State , 2019 WY 50, ¶ 34, 440 P.3d 1095, 1106 (Wyo. 2019)). [¶59] The district court found ... "
Document | Wyoming Supreme Court – 2024
Keller v. State
"... ... right secured by the Confrontation Clause … is the right of cross-examination." Tamblyn , 2020 WY 76, ¶ 47, 465 P.3d at 452 (quoting Sparks v ... State , 2019 WY 50, ¶ 41, 440 P.3d 1095, 1108 (Wyo. 2019)); Pennsylvania v ... Ritchie , 480 U.S. 39, 53, 107 S. Ct. 989, 999, 94 L. Ed. 2d 40 ... "
Document | Wyoming Supreme Court – 2019
Herrera v. State
"... ... 2019) (noting plain error standard applies when appellant demonstrates trial court’s actions may have impacted fundamental rights); Sparks v. State , 2019 WY 50, ¶ 39, 440 P.3d 1095, 1108 (Wyo. 2019) (citing Anderson v. State , 2014 WY 13, ¶ 20, 317 P.3d 1108, 1115 (Wyo. 2014) ) ... "
Document | Wyoming Supreme Court – 2020
Tamblyn v. State
"... ... confront a witness arises under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I, Section 10 of the Wyoming Constitution." Sparks v. State , 2019 WY 50, ¶ 41, 440 P.3d 1095, 1108 (Wyo. 2019). "The primary right secured by the Confrontation Clause of the United States and ... "

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex