Sign Up for Vincent AI
Stamatopoulos v. All Seasons Contracting, Inc.
Civil Appeal from the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas
Case Nos. CV-12-785907 and CV-12-795314
Appearances:
Thrasher, Dinsmore & Dolan, L.P.A., Mary Jane Trapp, and Ezio A. Listati, for appellants/cross-appellees.
John M. Manos Co., L.P.A., and John M. Manos, for appellees/cross-appellants.
{¶ 1} Plaintiffs-appellants/cross-appellees Evangelos Stamatopoulos ("Stamatopoulos") individually, and as managing member of Lightning Capital Holdings, L.L.C. ("Lightning") (collectively "Appellants"), appeals from the September 12, 2018 journal entry clarifying an August 26, 2015 final entry of judgment in favor of defendants-appellees/cross-appellants Nikolas and Marika Fourtounis, trustees of the Nikolas and Marika Fourtounis Living Trust (collectively "the Fourtounises"). The Fourtounises and defendants-appellees Mark Fourtounis ("Mark"), All Seasons Contracting, Inc., and Global Outdoor Solutions, L.L.C. ("Global") (collectively, "Appellees") filed a cross-appeal. For the reasons that follow, we affirm in part, and vacate in part.
{¶ 2} The instant appeal is the result of protracted litigation dating back to June 2012. The underlying dispute arose out of a deteriorated relationship, and a convoluted set of business deals involving multiple individuals and entities. The following factual history was set forth in Stamatopoulos v. All Seasons Contr., 2018-Ohio-379, 104 N.E.3d 1001 (8th Dist.) ("Stamatopoulos II"):
{¶ 3} The procedural history of this case is equally convoluted, in part because two separate actions were initiated and proceeded separately for several months. On June 27, 2012, Stamatopoulos filed a verified complaint for replevin, order of possession, and other relief in Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleasagainst the All Seasons companies, Mark, Global, "Doe Corporation," and the Fourtounises. Stamatopoulos presented seven claims: (1) alter ego, (2) breach of contract related to the asset purchase agreement, (3) fraudulent inducement/intentional misrepresentation related to the asset purchase agreement, (4) conversion, (5) replevin/injunctive relief, (6) unjust enrichment, and (7) trespass to chattel. Stamatopoulos also sought and obtained from the trial court an emergency order of possession of 44 specific pieces of machinery, together with "[a]ll other assets purchased by the Stamatopoulos Parties in the bankruptcy of Defendants All Seasons * * * which are reasonably identifiable and which have yet to be turned over * * *." The order of possession explicitly stated that Stamatopoulos was not required to post a bond to obtain the relief set forth therein.
{¶ 4} All of the Appellees filed requests for a hearing and an emergency stay of the order of possession. The court conducted a hearing and ordered Appellees to provide Stamatopoulos with a list of the locations of the property at issue. On July 16, 2012, Appellees filed a motion to transfer the case to the court's commercial docket. The court denied this motion on July 19, 2012. On July 24, 2012, Appellees filed a notice of removal to federal court. On October 26, 2012, the case was remanded to the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas. On November 16, 2012, Global filed a motion requesting the court order Stamatopoulos to post a bond.
{¶ 5} On November 9, 2012, the Fourtounises initiated a separate action against Stamatopoulos in the trial court seeking confession of judgment on a cognovit note. The Fourtounises obtained a cognovit judgment in the amount of$112,000 against Stamatopoulos. On November 21, 2012, the Fourtounises filed an answer to Stamatopoulos's claims in his replevin action.
{¶ 6} On November 21, 2012, Mark filed an answer and counterclaim to Stamatopoulos's claims in the original case. Mark averred in his answer that the All Seasons companies had been "liquidated by order of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court on June 13, 2011 and the corporate charters for each corporation [were] thereafter cancelled by the Ohio Secretary of State." In his counterclaim, Mark sought an order from the trial court to enforce the settlement agreement. Mark averred that on March 30, 2012, Stamatopoulos had entered into an agreement with Appellees to resolve claims for "past due rent," and for "repayment of loans." According to the terms of this agreement, which was attached to Mark's counterclaim as an exhibit, Stamatopoulos executed a "Cognovit Promissory Note made payable to Manolis Investments, LLC" and the Fourtounises in the amount of $112,000. As security for the note, Stamatopoulos would, inter alia, transfer both the title and the possession of the Super Sucker to the Fourtounises. Mark claimed...
Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI
Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting