Sign Up for Vincent AI
State v. Berlin
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Petition For Review: Denied.
1 cases
State v. Hart
"... ... We hold that this extended cross-examination of Hart was constitutional error and that it was not harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. 3 A. Standard of Review ¶ 11 We review a trial court's ruling on the scope of cross-examination for abuse of discretion. State v. Berlin, 167 Wash.App. 113, 127, 271 P.3d 400 (citing State v. Fisher, 165 Wash.2d 727, 752, 202 P.3d 937 (2009)), review denied, 174 Wash.2d 1009, 281 P.3d 686 (2012). A court necessarily abuses its discretion if it denies an accused his constitutional rights. State v. Iniguez, 167 Wash.2d 273, 280, ... "
Try vLex and Vincent AI for free
Start a free trialExperience vLex's unparalleled legal AI
Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
1 cases
State v. Hart
"... ... We hold that this extended cross-examination of Hart was constitutional error and that it was not harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. 3 A. Standard of Review ¶ 11 We review a trial court's ruling on the scope of cross-examination for abuse of discretion. State v. Berlin, 167 Wash.App. 113, 127, 271 P.3d 400 (citing State v. Fisher, 165 Wash.2d 727, 752, 202 P.3d 937 (2009)), review denied, 174 Wash.2d 1009, 281 P.3d 686 (2012). A court necessarily abuses its discretion if it denies an accused his constitutional rights. State v. Iniguez, 167 Wash.2d 273, 280, ... "
Try vLex and Vincent AI for free
Start a free trialStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting