Case Law State v. Blake

State v. Blake

Document Cited Authorities (2) Cited in Related

Anna A. Argenti, Assistant State's Attorney, Bismarck, ND, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.

Russell J. Myhre, Enderlin, ND, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Michael Blake appeals a district court's judgment after a jury convicted him of terrorizing, in violation of N.D.C.C. § 12.1-17-04(1), and unlawful entry into a vehicle, in violation of N.D.C.C. § 12.1-22-04. Blake argues the guilty verdict is not supported by sufficient evidence. After reviewing the record, we conclude sufficient evidence supports the verdict. We summarily affirm the criminal judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.

Lisa Fair McEvers

Gerald W. VandeWalle

Jerod E. Tufte

Daniel J. Crothers
1 cases
Document | North Dakota Supreme Court – 2020
Lavallie v. Jay
"... ... "Issues related to subject matter jurisdiction can be raised at any time and cannot be waived." Ellis v. N.D. State Univ. , 2010 ND 114, ¶ 8, 783 N.W.2d 825 (citing Lee v. Lee , 2007 ND 147, ¶ 8, 738 N.W.2d 479 ). "[C]hallenges to a district court's subject ... "

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
1 cases
Document | North Dakota Supreme Court – 2020
Lavallie v. Jay
"... ... "Issues related to subject matter jurisdiction can be raised at any time and cannot be waived." Ellis v. N.D. State Univ. , 2010 ND 114, ¶ 8, 783 N.W.2d 825 (citing Lee v. Lee , 2007 ND 147, ¶ 8, 738 N.W.2d 479 ). "[C]hallenges to a district court's subject ... "

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex