Sign Up for Vincent AI
State v. Carey
Jennifer B. Smith, for the appellant (defendant).
Rocco A. Chiarenza, assistant state's attorney, with whom, on the brief, were Brian Preleski, state's attorney, John H. Malone, former supervisory assistant state's attorney, and David Clifton, assistant state's attorney, for the appellee (state).
Alvord, Sheldon and Eveleigh, Js.
The defendant, Alanna R. Carey, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a-54a (a).1 On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the trial court improperly admitted hearsay testimony, (2) the state engaged in prosecutorial impropriety that deprived her of a fair trial, and (3) the trial court's instruction on witness credibility improperly misled the jury. We disagree and, accordingly, affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The jury reasonably could have found the following facts. The defendant and the victim, Edward Landry, began dating in May, 1999. Between 1999 and the victim's death in January, 2012, the defendant and the victim had a tumultuous relationship. In 2008, the victim moved into the defendant's house in Glastonbury, where the two lived together until 2011. Many of those acquainted with the defendant and the victim, including their relatives and neighbors, described their relationship as volatile and testified that the two often argued and fought.
On December 12, 2011, the defendant's twin sister, Johanna Carey-Lang, learned that the victim was having an affair with Jodi D'Onofrio when she walked into the defendant's home and found the victim and D'Onofrio together. That same day, the victim called the defendant and informed her of his infidelity. Nevertheless, later in the day, Carey-Lang saw the defendant and the victim "cuddling" on a couch in the defendant's house.
On December 14, 2011, the victim moved out of the defendant's house and moved to the Carrier Motor Lodge in Newington (motel). On that day, the victim removed his belongings from the defendant's house and left his keys in the house, which, according to D'Onofrio, was an attempt by the victim to communicate to the defendant that their relationship was over. D'Onofrio also testified that the victim told her that he did not want to be in a relationship with the defendant any longer and that he hoped the breakup would be amicable.
After the victim moved to the motel, he and the defendant remained in contact. Between December 15, 2011 and January 2, 2012, the two exchanged over ninety-five phone calls and twenty-five text messages. Additionally, the defendant and the victim saw each other in person several times during that period.
On December 18, 2011, the defendant checked into the motel and rented a room close to the victim's. The defendant called Carey-Lang from the motel room and asked her to set up a three way phone call with the victim. D'Onofrio was with the victim when he received the defendant's call. According to D'Onofrio, the defendant asked the victim whether he still loved her, to which the victim responded that he loved D'Onofrio. The victim subsequently informed his friend, Jessica Montano, of his interaction with the defendant on December 18, 2011. According to Montano, the victim recounted that the defendant begged him not to end their relationship and that, as a result of this interaction, the victim feared the defendant.
On January 2, 2012, the defendant and Carey-Lang went to the shooting range at Hoffman's Gun Center (gun center) in Newington. Leon Brazalovich, Carey-Lang's boyfriend, accompanied the sisters to the gun center, but did not shoot while he was there. The defendant and Carey-Lang, both of whom had gun permits, signed in at the front desk and proceeded to shoot at the range for approximately thirty minutes to an hour. The defendant used her gun, a pink .380 Ruger light pistol, to shoot. After the defendant and Carey-Lang left the range, the defendant asked Brazalovich to load ammunition she had just purchased at the gun center into two magazines.
At 1:33 p.m., while the defendant was at the shooting range, she received a call from the victim. After speaking to the victim, the defendant told Carey-Lang that she planned to bring him lunch at the motel. At around 2 p.m., the defendant drove Carey-Lang and Brazalovich to Boston Market, where the defendant ordered lunch. The defendant then drove to the motel, where she got out of the car and went to the victim's room, carrying the food and her purse, which contained her gun.
About forty-five minutes after the defendant arrived at the motel, Carey-Lang sent the defendant a text message, informing her that she and Brazalovich had finished lunch. The defendant responded that she would like to spend another hour at the motel, and Carey-Lang told her to call when she was ready to be picked up.
Three hours later, at approximately 4:20 p.m., the defendant sent Carey-Lang a text message, asking: "When will you be here." Approximately one minute later, the defendant again texted Carey-Lang, asking: Between 5:35 and 6:51 p.m., the following text message exchange took place:
Between 7:02 and 7:04 p.m., Carey-Lang sent the defendant text messages instructing the defendant to meet her at an Aldi market near the motel in five minutes. Approximately eight minutes later, Carey-Lang sent the defendant a text message stating that she was at Aldi. About eighteen minutes after that, at approximately 7:30 p.m., the defendant called Carey-Lang and asked her to come to the victim's room. Sometime during the period in which the defendant and Carey-Lang discussed meeting at Aldi, the defendant shot and killed the victim.
When Carey-Lang arrived at the motel, the defendant invited her into the room and informed her that "[the victim] came after [the defendant] with a knife, and that he put a hit on [their] family, and he was going to take care of [the defendant] himself." The victim's body was on the floor when Carey-Lang entered the room, but she did not recall seeing a knife near the victim. She checked the victim's pulse and could not detect one. Carey-Lang then instructed the defendant to call 911, but the defendant refused to do so.
At approximately 8 p.m., the defendant and Carey-Lang left the motel room. The defendant took the shell casings, which she placed in her pocket, with her purse, her cell phone, and the bag of food from Boston Market. The two drove from the motel directly to the home of their brother, Joseph Carey, in Wethersfield.
During the drive to Wethersfield, Carey-Lang continued to encourage the defendant to call 911. Once they arrived in Wethersfield, Carey-Lang and Joseph Carey urged the defendant to return to the motel and call 911.
Eventually, the defendant agreed, and Carey-Lang drove her back to the motel. Once they reached the motel, however, the defendant changed her mind and refused to go back into the victim's room. Carey-Lang drove to a nearby parking lot and called Joseph Carey to ask if he would join them. When Joseph Carey arrived at the parking lot, Carey-Lang called their father, who also encouraged the defendant to call 911. After Joseph Carey spoke with the defendant, Carey-Lang drove the defendant back to the motel, where she "sort of tried to push [the defendant] out of the car" and drove away.
After being dropped off at the motel, the defendant returned to the victim's room, where she called Carey-Lang three more times, once at 9:35 p.m. and twice at 9:50 p.m. During the second 9:50 p.m. call, the defendant asked Carey-Lang to come back to the motel and pick her up, but Carey-Lang refused to do so.
Finally, at approximately 10 p.m., almost three hours after the defendant shot the victim, the defendant called 911. The defendant told the 911 operator: The operator asked whether the victim was moving, and the defendant responded, "I don't think so." The defendant also told the operator that she "didn't even know if [she] hit him" and, when asked whether she was injured, the defendant said:
The police arrived at the motel at approximately 10:13 p.m. and instructed the defendant to exit the victim's room. Once the defendant had exited the room, the police placed her in the back of a police vehicle. The police then entered the room, where they found the victim's body on the floor between two beds. Matthew D'Esposito, an officer with the Newington Police Department, "noticed that [the victim] was not breathing, [and that] he had no carotid pulse." D'Esposito testified that "[t]here was some slight rigor mortis in [the victim's] pinky fingers ...." After efforts to resuscitate the victim at the scene failed, he was transported to Hartford Hospital, where he was pronounced dead on arrival.
When the police searched the room, they found, on the floor, the defendant's gun and three shell casings that were subsequently determined to have been fired from that gun. They also found the defendant's purse, which contained a gun holster and case, as well as a magazine containing six .380 caliber bullets. The defendant's purse also contained a pair of latex gloves. The defendant's DNA was found on the exterior of...
Try vLex and Vincent AI for free
Start a free trialExperience vLex's unparalleled legal AI
Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Try vLex and Vincent AI for free
Start a free trialStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting