Sign Up for Vincent AI
State v. Collins
Matt J. Maloney, assistant district attorney, argued the cause, and Marc Bennett, district attorney, and Derek Schmidt, attorney general, were with him on the brief for appellant.
Patrick H. Dunn, of Kansas Appellate Defender Office, argued the cause and was on the brief for appellee.
The lower courts disagree over the defendant's entitlement to statutory self-defense immunity after he drew a knife during an altercation with three unarmed women that ended with one dead and another seriously injured. The district court dismissed second-degree murder and reckless aggravated battery charges, ruling Seth Collins had reasonable grounds to believe he was in danger of great bodily harm. A Court of Appeals panel reversed and remanded the case for further district court proceedings. State v. Collins , 56 Kan. App. 2d 140, 149, 425 P.3d 630 (2018) (). We agree with the panel.
We hold Collins is not entitled to immunity from prosecution under K.S.A. 2019 Supp. 21-5231. On the facts as found by the district court, there is probable cause to believe Collins' use of force was not statutorily justified. To explain this, we parse the escalating sequence of events comprising the deadly encounter by breaking it down into discrete uses of force of varying degrees. And by examining each forceful act in context, we conclude the State met its probable cause burden by showing that an ordinarily prudent and cautious person could conscientiously entertain a reasonable belief Collins was not privileged to apply deadly force. That was all the State had to do at this pretrial juncture. See K.S.A. 2019 Supp. 21-5231(c) (); see also K.S.A. 2019 Supp. 21-5231(a) ().
Whether Collins' conduct, as alleged by the State, was justified under the self-defense statutes must be decided at a trial under our statutory scheme.
Our focus is on two incidents on the same evening at an apartment complex involving Collins and his neighbors. In the first incident, Collins suffered multiple head and body injuries. In the second, Kayla Brown died from stab wounds inflicted by Collins with a foldable knife that had a 4.5-inch handle and "slightly less" than a 4-inch blade. Kayla's twin sister, Shayla Brown, suffered a serious stab wound to her bicep. At the time, Collins was 38 years old, 5'11" tall, and weighed about 250 to 255 lbs. Shayla was 22 years old, 4'11" tall and weighed about 113 lbs. Kayla was the same height as Shayla but weighed about 10 lbs. less. The State charged Collins with second-degree murder for killing Kayla and reckless aggravated battery for stabbing Shayla. See K.S.A. 2019 Supp. 21-5403(a)(1) ; K.S.A. 2015 Supp. 21-5413(b)(2)(B).
Collins filed a pretrial motion to dismiss the State's charges claiming self-defense immunity. See K.S.A. 2019 Supp. 21-5222 (self-defense theory); K.S.A. 2019 Supp. 21-5231 (immunity from prosecution). The district court conducted a three-day evidentiary hearing, during which the parties presented testimony and statements from several witnesses, including Collins, other participants in the conflict, and outside observers. The district court agreed with Collins and dismissed the case.
We recite the facts as found by the district court in its order granting Collins self-defense immunity because our standard of review preserves factual findings supported by substantial competent evidence. See State v. Hardy , 305 Kan. 1001, 1012, 390 P.3d 30 (2017). When necessary, we quote from the district court's order.
The two incidents
The first incident began on the night of April 30, 2016, when Collins drove back to his apartment with his two daughters. He tried to park near a vehicle occupied by Luz Toral. Shayla was outside the vehicle talking to Toral. Collins believed Shayla was obstructing the parking spot. He "made negative comments" towards the women and drove away.
After leaving his vehicle in guest parking, Collins and his daughters walked to his apartment building. Another verbal exchange ensued between Collins and Toral. Collins' daughters kept walking toward his apartment. Shayla and Kayla got involved. Collins "clearly received and delivered numerous verbal insults" including some that were "racist, vulgar and inciting." A physical altercation broke out that Collins "started ... by pushing himself physically up to Ms. Toral in the parking lot." Kayla, Shayla, "and possibly others joined in against" Collins. At that time, his daughters called 911. Trishall Dear, the twins' mother, arrived in the parking lot and calmed the situation. Collins went into his apartment, having "sustained significant external injuries to his face, head and other portions of his body ...."
About 10 minutes later, the deadly second incident began when Collins returned to the parking lot to look for his glasses. Kayla, Shayla, and Dear were still outside. Collins, Shayla, and Kayla reengaged in a verbal quarrel with more insults. After Collins found his glasses, he had more words with the twins and walked back toward his apartment. As he passed Dear, who was standing near the door into the building, he "quietly stated something derogatory" to her.
Dear followed Collins into the building. Her daughters started after them. Collins walked up a nine-step staircase. As he approached the top, "all three ladies [were] very close (just a step or two) behind him and he look[ed] back at them." The district court characterized this moment elsewhere in its order as the women "confront[ing him] from behind in a very aggressive way" and noted "it [was] apparent from the evidence [the twins] intended to physically punish him for the way he had treated them and their mother."
Then, the court found:
The district court did not clearly address how Kayla and Shayla were stabbed, but Collins testified he "start[ed] waving the knife" as they all tumbled down the stairs. He denied using "precision stabs or cuts" or "looking at exactly where the knife [was] going."
The State timely appealed, arguing it had established probable cause that Collins' use of deadly force was not necessary to prevent great bodily harm to himself. See K.S.A. 2019 Supp. 21-5222. It also argued Collins' use of deadly force was not statutorily justified because he was the initial aggressor in the stairwell incident under K.S.A. 2019 Supp. 21-5226. A Court of Appeals panel reversed.
The panel acknowledged the district court faced conflicting evidence but concluded the court applied the wrong legal standard. Collins , 56 Kan. App. 2d at 152, 425 P.3d 630. It reasoned that the district court erred by deciding what a jury was supposed to decide, i.e., "whether Collins was justified in his use of deadly force in self-defense." 56 Kan. App. 2d at 152, 425 P.3d 630. As the panel explained, "[t]he State's burden in overcoming Collins' immunity claim was simply to establish probable cause...
Try vLex and Vincent AI for free
Start a free trialExperience vLex's unparalleled legal AI
Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Try vLex and Vincent AI for free
Start a free trialStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting