Case Law State v. Cross

State v. Cross

Document Cited Authorities (2) Cited in (1) Related

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Prior report: 156 Wash.App. 568, 234 P.3d 288.

ORDER

¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Madsen and Justices Alexander, Owens, J.M. Johnson and Wiggins, considered at its September 6, 2011, Motion Calendar, whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b), and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That the Petition for Review is granted only on the car search issue and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals Division Two for reconsideration in light of Supreme Court No. 83525–0, State of Washington v. Robinson, 171 Wash.2d 292, 253 P.3d 84 (2011).

For the Court

/s/ Madsen, C.J.

CHIEF JUSTICE
5 cases
Document | U.S. District Court — District of Columbia – 2018
Beach TV Props., Inc. v. Solomon
"... ... Solomon was negligent when he filed the incomplete form, and now moves for summary judgment as to Mr. Solomon's liability. In his cross-motion for summary judgment, Mr. Solomon argues that ACI cannot recover because its malpractice claim is barred by the statute of limitations, ... 1982). "Where, as here, ‘the substantive law of the forum state is uncertain or ambiguous, the job of the federal courts is carefully to predict how the highest court of the forum state would resolve the ... "
Document | Washington Court of Appeals – 2015
Jennifer Linth & the Estate of Linth v. Gay
"..."
Document | Washington Court of Appeals – 2023
State v. Mylan
"... ... that the person threatened must subjectively fear that the ... threat will be carried out and that the victim's fear ... must be reasonable based on an objective standard, ... considering all the facts and circumstances of the case ... See State v. Cross , 156 Wn.App. 568, 582, 234 P.3d ... 288 (2010), ... cause remanded on other grounds , 172 Wn.2d 1009, 260 ... P.3d 208 (2011); State v. E.J.Y. , 113 Wn.App. 940, ... 953, 55 P.3d 673 (2002) ...          2 ... Standard of Review ... "
Document | Washington Court of Appeals – 2018
State v. Skald
"... ... cert. denied, 138 S.Ct. 313 (2017). The defendant ... need not know that the threat will be communicated to the ... victim. Id. at 906 ... Second, ... the person threatened must subjectively fear that the threat ... will be carried out. See State v. Cross, 156 Wn.App ... 568, 582, 234 P.3d 288 (2010), cause remanded on other ... grounds, 172 Wn.2d 1009, 260 P.3d 208 (2011); State ... v. E.J.Y., 113 Wn.App. 940, 953, 55 P.3d 673 (2002) ... Third, ... the threat made and the threat feared must generally be the ... same. State v. C.G., ... "
Document | Washington Court of Appeals – 2018
State v. Skald
"... ... denied, 138 S. Ct. 313 (2017). The defendant need not know that the threat will be communicated to the victim. Id. at 906.        Second, the person threatened must subjectively fear that the threat will be carried out. See State v. Cross, 156 Wn. App. 568, 582, 234 P.3d 288 (2010), cause remanded on other grounds, 172 Wn.2d 1009, 260 P.3d 208 (2011); State v. E.J.Y., 113 Wn. App. 940, 953, 55 P.3d 673 (2002).        Third, the threat made and the threat feared must generally be the same. State v. C.G., 150 Wn.2d 604, 609, ... "

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
Document | U.S. District Court — District of Columbia – 2018
Beach TV Props., Inc. v. Solomon
"... ... Solomon was negligent when he filed the incomplete form, and now moves for summary judgment as to Mr. Solomon's liability. In his cross-motion for summary judgment, Mr. Solomon argues that ACI cannot recover because its malpractice claim is barred by the statute of limitations, ... 1982). "Where, as here, ‘the substantive law of the forum state is uncertain or ambiguous, the job of the federal courts is carefully to predict how the highest court of the forum state would resolve the ... "
Document | Washington Court of Appeals – 2015
Jennifer Linth & the Estate of Linth v. Gay
"..."
Document | Washington Court of Appeals – 2023
State v. Mylan
"... ... that the person threatened must subjectively fear that the ... threat will be carried out and that the victim's fear ... must be reasonable based on an objective standard, ... considering all the facts and circumstances of the case ... See State v. Cross , 156 Wn.App. 568, 582, 234 P.3d ... 288 (2010), ... cause remanded on other grounds , 172 Wn.2d 1009, 260 ... P.3d 208 (2011); State v. E.J.Y. , 113 Wn.App. 940, ... 953, 55 P.3d 673 (2002) ...          2 ... Standard of Review ... "
Document | Washington Court of Appeals – 2018
State v. Skald
"... ... cert. denied, 138 S.Ct. 313 (2017). The defendant ... need not know that the threat will be communicated to the ... victim. Id. at 906 ... Second, ... the person threatened must subjectively fear that the threat ... will be carried out. See State v. Cross, 156 Wn.App ... 568, 582, 234 P.3d 288 (2010), cause remanded on other ... grounds, 172 Wn.2d 1009, 260 P.3d 208 (2011); State ... v. E.J.Y., 113 Wn.App. 940, 953, 55 P.3d 673 (2002) ... Third, ... the threat made and the threat feared must generally be the ... same. State v. C.G., ... "
Document | Washington Court of Appeals – 2018
State v. Skald
"... ... denied, 138 S. Ct. 313 (2017). The defendant need not know that the threat will be communicated to the victim. Id. at 906.        Second, the person threatened must subjectively fear that the threat will be carried out. See State v. Cross, 156 Wn. App. 568, 582, 234 P.3d 288 (2010), cause remanded on other grounds, 172 Wn.2d 1009, 260 P.3d 208 (2011); State v. E.J.Y., 113 Wn. App. 940, 953, 55 P.3d 673 (2002).        Third, the threat made and the threat feared must generally be the same. State v. C.G., 150 Wn.2d 604, 609, ... "

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex