Sign Up for Vincent AI
State v. Hale
Criminal Appeal from the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Case No. CR-04-454857-A
Michael C. O'Malley, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Sarah E. Hutnik, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.
Law Office of Timothy Farrell Sweeney and Timothy F. Sweeney, for appellant.
ON RECONSIDERATION[1]
JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Delano Hale ("Hale"), appeals from the trial court's denial of his "motion for leave to file a delayed motion for new trial, with memorandum in support and all exhibits." He raises the following assignments of error for review:
{¶ 2} After careful review of the record and relevant case law, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand the matter to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
{¶ 3} On July 28, 2004, Hale was indicted for aggravated murder, with felony murder death specifications, aggravated robbery, tampering with evidence, and having a weapon while under disability, all in connection with the death of Douglas Green ("Green"). The relevant facts supporting the indictment are as follows:
State v. Hale, 119 Ohio St.3d 118, 2008-Ohio-3426, 892 N.E.2d 864, ¶ 4-17 ("Hale I ").
{¶ 4} "At trial, the defense claimed that Hale's killing of Green constituted lawful self-defense because Green had attempted to rape Hale." Id. at ¶ 36. Ultimately, the jury rejected Hale's defense and found him guilty of all counts and specifications. On July 18, 2005, the trial court adopted the jury's unanimous recommendation and sentenced Hale to death on the aggravated-murder offense, and an aggregate 13-year prison term on the remaining convictions.
{¶ 5} On July 15, 2008, Hale's conviction and sentence were affirmed by the Ohio Supreme Court. Hale I.
{¶ 6} While his direct appeal was pending before the Ohio Supreme Court, Hale filed a petition for postconviction relief, raising 19 grounds for relief. Following a substantial delay, the trial court dismissed Hale's petition on September 24, 2015. This court affirmed the trial court's judgement in State v. Hale, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 103654, 2016-Ohio-5837, ¶ 49 ("Hale II ").
{¶ 7} On January 11, 2017, Hale filed a "combined motion for leave to file a motion for new mitigation trial pursuant to criminal rule 33 and R.C. 2953.21." Hale argued that the Ohio death penalty scheme was unconstitutional. On September 10, 2018, the trial court denied Hale's combined motion. This court affirmed the trial court's judgment in State v. Hale, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 107782, 2019-Ohio-1890 ("Hale III ").
{¶ 8} In 2008, and again in 2017, Hale filed petitions for writs of certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court, which were denied. Hale v. Ohio, 556 U.S. 1168, 129 S.Ct. 1906, 173 L.Ed.2d 106 (2009); Hale v. Ohio, 138 S.Ct. 1269, 200 L.Ed.2d 424 (2018).
{¶ 9} On October 10, 2018, Hale filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the Northern District of Ohio Eastern Division, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. In relevant part, Hale argued that the trial court's jury-selection procedures, which excluded persons convicted of felonies from the jury pool, violated his Sixth Amendment right to a jury from a fair cross-section of his community and his Fourteenth Amendment rights to due process and equal protection. Hale also raised various ineffective assistance of counsel claims based on defense counsel's alleged failure t0 (1) hire experts in forensic pathology, bloodstain pattern analysis, forensic psychiatry, sexual abuse, and trauma; ...
Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI
Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting