Case Law State v. James H.

State v. James H.

Document Cited Authorities (1) Cited in Related

Raymond L. Durelli, assigned counsel, in support of the petition.

Denise B. Smoker, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

Opinion

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 150 Conn.App. 847, 95 A.3d 524, is denied.

3 cases
Document | Connecticut Court of Appeals – 2015
State v. Badaracco
"... ... State v. Reynolds , supra, 152 Conn. App. 326; see also State v. Paul B ., 315 Conn. 19, Page 11 32, A.3d (2014) (in absence of contrary evidence, appellate courts presume jury followed limiting instruction); State v. James G ., 268 Conn. 382, 397-98, 844 A.2d 810 (2004) (same). For these reasons, we conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion in denying the defendant's motion in limine. B         The defendant next argues that the court improperly precluded him from presenting evidence that the grand ... "
Document | Connecticut Court of Appeals – 2018
State v. Montanez
"... ... Accordingly, [a]ny assessment of the form and scope of the inquiry that a trial court must undertake when it is presented with allegations of jur[or] [bias or] misconduct will necessarily be fact specific." (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. James H. , 150 Conn. App. 847, 853, 95 A.3d 524, cert. denied, 314 Conn. 913, 100 A.3d 404 (2014). "Our role as an appellate court is limited ... to a consideration of whether the trial court's review of alleged jury misconduct can fairly be characterized as an abuse of its discretion." (Internal ... "
Document | Connecticut Supreme Court – 2014
State v. Dickson
"..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
3 cases
Document | Connecticut Court of Appeals – 2015
State v. Badaracco
"... ... State v. Reynolds , supra, 152 Conn. App. 326; see also State v. Paul B ., 315 Conn. 19, Page 11 32, A.3d (2014) (in absence of contrary evidence, appellate courts presume jury followed limiting instruction); State v. James G ., 268 Conn. 382, 397-98, 844 A.2d 810 (2004) (same). For these reasons, we conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion in denying the defendant's motion in limine. B         The defendant next argues that the court improperly precluded him from presenting evidence that the grand ... "
Document | Connecticut Court of Appeals – 2018
State v. Montanez
"... ... Accordingly, [a]ny assessment of the form and scope of the inquiry that a trial court must undertake when it is presented with allegations of jur[or] [bias or] misconduct will necessarily be fact specific." (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. James H. , 150 Conn. App. 847, 853, 95 A.3d 524, cert. denied, 314 Conn. 913, 100 A.3d 404 (2014). "Our role as an appellate court is limited ... to a consideration of whether the trial court's review of alleged jury misconduct can fairly be characterized as an abuse of its discretion." (Internal ... "
Document | Connecticut Supreme Court – 2014
State v. Dickson
"..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex