Case Law State v. James K.

State v. James K.

Document Cited Authorities (1) Cited in (4) Related

342 Conn. 904
270 A.3d 692 (Mem)

STATE of Connecticut
v.
JAMES K.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided March 8, 2022


Pamela S. Nagy, supervisory assistant public defender, in support of the petition.

Melissa E. Patterson, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 209...

1 cases
Document | Connecticut Supreme Court – 2023
State v. James K.
"...at trial and the prejudicial effect of the video-recorded interview greatly outweighed its marginal probative value?" State v. James K. , 342 Conn. 904, 270 A.3d 692 (2022). 3 I Both in this court and in the Appellate Court, the state identified an inconsistency in our case law regarding wh..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
1 cases
Document | Connecticut Supreme Court – 2023
State v. James K.
"...at trial and the prejudicial effect of the video-recorded interview greatly outweighed its marginal probative value?" State v. James K. , 342 Conn. 904, 270 A.3d 692 (2022). 3 I Both in this court and in the Appellate Court, the state identified an inconsistency in our case law regarding wh..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex