Case Law State v. Morales

State v. Morales

Document Cited Authorities (1) Cited in Related

Appeal from the District Court of Ward County, North Central Judicial District, the Honorable Douglas L. Mattson, Judge.

Rozanna C. Larson, State's Attorney, Minot, ND, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.

Kevin McCabe, Dickinson, ND, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.

OPINION

Crothers, Justice

[¶1] Bradley Morales appeals from a criminal judgment entered after he pleaded guilty to murder. We affirm concluding the district court did not abuse its discretion when it denied Morales' motion to withdraw his guilty plea.

I

[¶2] A jury found Morales guilty of murdering his ex-girlfriend. We reversed and remanded for a new trial, concluding Morales' constitutional right to a public trial was violated. See State v. Morales, 2019 ND 206, 932 N.W.2d 106. On the fourth day of the new trial, Morales sought to enter a guilty plea. The district court questioned Morales to verify his decision was not impulsive and was knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently made. Morales made a lengthy statement. He admitted to stabbing the victim acknowledged "I did cause the death," and apologized to the victim's family. He explained the crime and subsequent prosecution "messed up my mind," but "I can see clearly now." The court accepted Morales' guilty plea. Roughly nine months later, on the day of sentencing, Morales moved to withdraw his plea. The court denied Morales' motion after allowing each side to make arguments. The court sentenced Morales to 35 years imprisonment. Morales appeals.

II

[¶3] North Dakota Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(d) governs the withdrawal of a guilty plea. To withdraw a guilty plea after the court has accepted the plea but before sentencing, a defendant must "show a fair and just reason for the withdrawal." N.D.R.Crim.P. 11(d)(1)(B)(ii).

"[A]mong the factors that a district court may consider in determining whether a fair and just reason exists to withdraw a guilty plea before sentencing are: (1) the amount of time that has passed between the entry of the plea and the motion to withdraw; (2) defendant's assertion of innocence or a legally cognizable defense to the charge; (3) prejudice to the government; (4) whether the plea was knowing and voluntary; (5) whether the plea was made in compliance with Rule 11, N.D.R.Crim.P.; (6) whether adequate assistance of counsel was available to the defendant; (7) the plausibility of the reason for seeking to withdraw; (8) whether a plea withdrawal would waste judicial resources; and (9) whether the parties had reached or breached a plea agreement."

State v. Guthmiller, 2019 ND 85, ¶ 9, 924 N.W.2d 785 (alteration in original) (quoting State v Lium, 2008 ND 232, ¶ 17, 758 N.W.2d 711). Additional factors courts may consider include the presence or absence of a reason for not moving to withdraw the plea sooner and the defendant's experience with the judicial system. State v. Yost, 2018 ND 157, ¶ 11, 914 N.W.2d 508. "The validity of a guilty plea is assessed by whether it represents a 'voluntary and intelligent choice among the alternative courses of action open to the defendant.'" State v. Dunn, 2023 ND 24, ¶ 7, 985 N.W.2d 644 (quoting State v. Bates, 2007 ND 15, ¶ 14, 726 N.W.2d 595).

[¶4] We review a district court's decision on a motion to withdraw a guilty plea for an abuse of discretion. State v. Watson, 2021 ND 18, ¶ 7, 954 N.W.2d 679. "An abuse of discretion occurs when the court's legal discretion is not exercised in the interest of justice" and when it "acts in an arbitrary, unreasonable, or capricious manner, or it misinterprets or misapplies the law." Id.

[¶5] Morales argues the district court erred because it did not address a statement he made at the sentencing hearing indicating he was suffering from depression and anxiety. While arguing in support of his withdrawal motion, Morales stated:

"[Y]ou all are crushing my spirit; you're demoralizing me; you sent me to a state of
...

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex