Case Law State v. Samuel M.

State v. Samuel M.

Document Cited Authorities (2) Cited in Related

Kathryn W. Bare, assistant state's attorney, in support of the petition.

Bryan P. Fiengo, New London, in opposition.

Opinion

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 159 Conn.App. 242, 123 A.3d 44 (2015), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court correctly determine that in crimes automatically transferred from the juvenile docket of the Superior Court to the regular docket of the Superior Court pursuant to General Statutes § 46b–127 (a)(1), the state bears the burden of establishing the child's eligibility to be tried and sentenced as an adult?

“2. If the answer to the first question is in the affirmative, did the Appellate Court correctly determine that the state must meet its burden with proof beyond a reasonable doubt?

“3. Did the Appellate Court apply the correct standard of review to the trial court's decision denying the defendant's motion to dismiss and transfer the case to the juvenile docket?

“4. If the answer to the third question...

2 cases
Document | Connecticut Supreme Court – 2016
State v. Samuel M.
"..."
Document | Connecticut Supreme Court – 2015
State v. Samuel M.
"..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
2 cases
Document | Connecticut Supreme Court – 2016
State v. Samuel M.
"..."
Document | Connecticut Supreme Court – 2015
State v. Samuel M.
"..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex