Sign Up for Vincent AI
State v. Smith
Jennifer L. Foresta, Bryson King, and Douglas J. Thompson, Attorneys for Appellant
Sean D. Reyes, Kris C. Leonard, and Christopher D. Ballard, Salt Lake City, Attorneys for Appellee
Opinion
¶1 The "13-year-old girl" Shane Craig Smith met on the internet was, in reality, an undercover police detective. After arranging to pick up the "girl" in person at a convenience store, Smith was arrested and later charged with various crimes, including attempted child kidnapping and several attempted sex crimes. He eventually entered a conditional guilty plea to some of the charges, reserving his right to appeal two issues: whether there was insufficient evidence to bind over the attempt charges and whether the district court erred by denying his motion to dismiss all the charges on the basis that he had been entrapped. Smith now appeals, raising those two issues. For the reasons discussed, we affirm his convictions.
¶2 One evening, a police detective (Detective) was conducting an internet sting operation. He created an online persona on a text-based internet application (the app) that he understood had a reputation as a "hookup" site for individuals seeking sexual companionship. Although the app required users to be eighteen years of age or older, Detective had seen several cases involving "real child victims" on the app. In creating his online persona, Detective used a moniker like "Fun Girl" or "Good Time," and selected as his profile picture a stock photograph of an unknown female; he selected that particular photo because it appeared to be an "attractive" woman between the ages of eighteen and twenty-five. Across the front of the profile photo, Detective affixed the words "Wanting to HU," a term he stated meant to "hook up." Detective posted this profile, including the message "Wanting to HU," in a chat room titled "Sexual Confessions."
¶3 Detective's post received "hundreds" of responses, and he engaged in chats with "more than half of them." One of the app users who responded to Detective's post was Smith, whose initial response was "I'm down." Off and on over the next three hours, Smith and Detective engaged in the following exchange, which we include here in its entirety, accompanied by some explanatory footnotes:
¶4 At this point, officers arrested Smith. Once he was in custody, Smith admitted that he thought he had been communicating with a 13-year-old girl with whom he "wanted to have blow jobs and sex," but maintained that, because she was a runaway, he had merely planned on taking her to the local police station and not to California.
¶5 The State ultimately charged Smith with five crimes: attempted rape of a child, attempted sodomy on a child, attempted sexual exploitation of a minor, attempted child kidnapping, and enticing a minor over the internet.6 At a preliminary hearing at which Detective testified, the State sought bindover on all five counts, and Smith challenged the State's motion as to three of them (attempted rape, attempted sodomy, and attempted kidnapping). In particular, Smith argued that the State had failed to present sufficient evidence to establish that he took a "substantial step" toward committing any of the attempt offenses. Following briefing and oral argument, the district court, acting as magistrate, bound Smith over for trial on all charges, rejecting Smith's challenge to the bindover.
¶6 Later, Smith filed a motion asking the court to dismiss all charges, asserting that—if he had committed the offenses— Detective had, as a matter of law, entrapped him into doing so. Before ruling on the motion, the court held another evidentiary hearing at which Detective offered additional testimony. At this hearing, Detective discussed the various "outs" he had provided to Smith during their chat. An "out," Detective explained, is an attempt to give chat participants an opportunity to disengage themselves from the...
Try vLex and Vincent AI for free
Start a free trialExperience vLex's unparalleled legal AI
Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Try vLex and Vincent AI for free
Start a free trialStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting