Case Law State v. Webb

State v. Webb

Document Cited Authorities (4) Cited in Related

For Appellant: Chad Wright, Appellate Defender, Moses Okeyo, Assistant Appellate Defender, Helena, Montana

For Appellee: Austin Knudsen, Montana Attorney General, Michael P. Dougherty, Assistant Attorney General, Helena, Montana Kirsten H. Pabst, Missoula County Attorney, D. James McCubbin, Deputy County Attorney, Missoula, Montana

Chief Justice Mike McGrath delivered the Opinion of the Court.

¶1 Pursuant to Section I, Paragraph 3(c), Montana Supreme Court Internal Operating Rules, this case is decided by memorandum opinion and shall not be cited and does not serve as precedent. Its case title, cause number, and disposition shall be included in this Court's quarterly list of noncitable cases published in the Pacific Reporter and Montana Reports.

¶2 Defendant Matthew Douglas Webb appeals from the Judgment of the Fourth Judicial District Court, Missoula County, following his conviction of Criminal Possession of Dangerous Drugs, a felony, in violation of § 45-9-102(6), MCA (2015). We restate and address the following issue on appeal: Did the District Court err by denying Webb's motion to suppress evidence based on an alleged lack of particularized suspicion of wrongdoing?

¶3 We affirm.

¶4 Shortly before midnight on June 5, 2017, Montana Highway Patrol Trooper Novak observed a vehicle traveling on U.S. Highway 93 well below the posted speed limit. Trooper Novak ran a vehicle registration check and learned the vehicle belonged to a Sherry Louise Kenda-Feller and a Matthew Mitchell. Trooper Novak observed Mr. Mitchell's driver's license photograph matched the appearance of the only occupant of the vehicle. Trooper Novak also observed Mr. Mitchell's driving status returned as suspended.

¶5 Trooper Novak initiated a traffic stop of the vehicle. When he approached the vehicle, Trooper Novak greeted the driver and asked if he was Matthew Mitchell. The driver replied that his name was Matthew Webb; however, he was unable to produce proof of identification or insurance. When explaining how he came to possess the vehicle, Webb first stated he purchased the car from a friend, but then offered to call the "owner" of the vehicle when Trooper Novak requested registration and proof of insurance. Webb declined consent for Trooper Novak to search the vehicle, stating the vehicle was not his.

¶6 When Trooper Novak asked Webb where he lived, Webb provided a mailing address in Great Falls and a residential address in Butte. When Trooper Novak asked Webb where he was traveling that evening, Webb stated he was going to a friend's house in Stevensville but was unable to provide the friend's full name.

¶7 In verifying Webb's identity, Trooper Novak discovered Webb had prior convictions for criminal possession of dangerous drugs, criminal possession of drug paraphernalia, and distribution of dangerous drugs. Trooper Novak cited Webb for driving with a suspended license and failing to carry proof of insurance. Trooper Novak then contacted a canine unit to perform a canine sniff of Webb's vehicle. A canine was deployed to the vehicle and alerted to the presence of illegal drugs. Trooper Novak later obtained and executed a search warrant for Webb's vehicle and located a plastic bag containing nine hypodermic syringes, a black cloth pouch containing four hypodermic syringes, three small plastic bags with a powdery residue, a small plastic bag containing a crystalline substance which later tested positive for methamphetamine, and a spoon wrapped in a melted plastic bag.

¶8 On October 30, 2018, Webb was charged with criminal possession of dangerous drugs. Webb moved to suppress all evidence obtained as a result of the canine sniff of his vehicle. At the suppression hearing, Trooper Novak testified that during his encounter with Webb, Webb's hurried speech and shaking hands demonstrated "a level of nervousness which was inconsistent with the level" Trooper Novak was "accustomed to seeing with folks committing traffic violations or misdemeanors in that situation." Trooper Novak also testified that in his experience and training, distributors of dangerous drugs do not have a need to carry a wallet because they often travel with others who pay their expenses, which would explain why Webb was traveling a long distance without a wallet containing identification. Trooper Novak stated that during the encounter, Webb indicated a black mustang might pull up next to the stop, confirming Trooper Novak's belief that Webb was traveling with another individual. Trooper Novak further testified that in his experience, drug distributors travel in a team of vehicles, one of which carries the contraband.

¶9 The District Court denied Webb's motion upon determining that particularized suspicion existed to extend the traffic stop and conduct a canine sniff search of the vehicle. Webb later entered into a plea agreement with the State and received a suspended sentence to the Montana Department of Corrections for a two-year commitment. Webb reserved his right to appeal the denial of his motion to suppress.

¶10 We review a district court's ruling on a motion to suppress evidence to determine whether the court's underlying findings of fact are clearly erroneous and whether those findings were applied correctly as a matter of law. State v. Wilson , 2018 MT 268, ¶ 21, 393 Mont. 238, 430 P.3d 77. "A finding is clearly erroneous if it is not supported by substantial evidence, if the lower court has misapprehended the effect of the evidence, or if our review of the record leaves us with the firm conviction that a mistake has been made." Wilson , ¶ 21.

¶11 The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article II, Section 11, of the Montana Constitution protect persons against unreasonable governmental searches and seizures, "including brief investigatory stops such as traffic stops." Wilson , ¶ 25. A search or seizure conducted absent a...

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex