State v. Williams

439 S.C. 620

889 S.E.2d 562

The STATE, Petitioner, v. James Caleb WILLIAMS, Respondent.

Appellate Case No. 2021-001493

Opinion No. 28157

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Heard March 8, 2023

Filed June 14, 2023

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, and Solicitor Ernest Adolphus Finney, III, of Sumter, all for Petitioner.

Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:

James Caleb Williams was indicted for the attempted murder of Ashley R., the attempted murder of Malik Myers, and one count of possession of a weapon during the commission of a violent crime, related to a shooting at a nightclub in Sumter County. A jury convicted Williams of the attempted murder of Ashley R. and the possession charge. The court of appeals reversed Williams’ convictions in a 2-1 opinion.

State v. Williams , 435 S.C. 288, 867 S.E.2d 430 (Ct. App. 2021). The majority concluded the trial court erred in not granting Williams’ directed verdict motion as to the attempted murder of Ashley R. because the State relied on the doctrine of transferred intent to prove Williams had the intent to kill Ashley R. The majority held the doctrine of transferred intent does not apply to specific intent crimes, such as attempted murder. The dissent disagreed, but found the issue unpreserved. We granted the State's petition for a writ of certiorari to address whether transferred intent applies to specific intent crimes. However, after oral argument and further deliberation, we find this issue was not preserved at trial. We therefore reverse the court of appeals’ majority opinion.

I.

The facts of this case are adequately presented in the court of appeals’ opinion. Pertinent to our resolution is Williams’ motion for directed verdict. Williams moved for a directed verdict on the sole ground that the State had not presented sufficient evidence as to the identity of the person who shot at Myers and Ashley R. The State responded that it had presented enough evidence to create a jury question as to whether Williams was the shooter. As to Ashley R., the State argued, "just specifically because he was not shooting directly at Ashley, I would point out that we're proceeding under transferred intent and we do believe that he was firing his gun with malice and the bullet struck Ashley R." The trial court denied the motion for a directed verdict, reasoning, in part, that the evidence supported the charges against Williams because there was testimony Williams was firing at Myers and–"by transferred intent"–Ashley R. After presenting his defense, Williams renewed his motion for a directed verdict "for the reasons I stated earlier." The trial court denied the renewed motion. The trial court later...