Case Law Stroder v. Town of Welsh

Stroder v. Town of Welsh

Document Cited Authorities (1) Cited in Related

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION

Steve M. Sikich

The Sikich Law Firm

COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFFS/APPELLANTS

Shawn Stroder and Trisha Stroder

Joy C Rabalais

H Edward Barousse, III

Jordan John Henagan

Grant R. Schexnailder

K Elizabeth Heinen

Borne Wilkes &Rabalais, LLC

COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANTS/APPELLEES
Town of Welsh and Officer David Amrine, Individually and in His Official Capacity as a Police Officer for the Town of Welsh

Court composed of Gary J. Ortego, Ledricka J. Thierry, and Guy E. Bradberry, Judges.

LEDRICKA J. THIERRY JUDGE

Plaintiffs, Shawn Stroder and Tricia Stroder, appeal the decision of the district court finding their claims to be prescribed. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On May 23, 2020, Shawn Stroder was riding a bicycle in Welsh, Louisiana in Jefferson Davis Parish, when he was struck by defendant, Officer David Amrine, who was driving a 2019 Ford Explorer owned by the Town of Welsh. Mr. Stroder alleges he was dragged approximately 180 feet, causing severe injuries to his back, head, ears, mouth, and other areas of his body. At the time of the accident, Plaintiffs allege that Officer David Amrine was an employee of the Town of Welsh and the Welsh Police Department.

On May 18, 2021, Shawn Stroder and Tricia Stroder filed a petition for damages in Calcasieu Parish against several Defendants: the Town of Welsh, the Welsh Police Department, David M. Amrine (incorrectly spelled as "Armine" in the petition), and Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company. The petition identifies Officer Amrine's domicile as Iowa, Louisiana, located in Calcasieu Parish. The Town of Welsh and the Welsh Police Department are both located in Jefferson Davis Parish. Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company is a foreign insurance company with its registered agent located in Baton Rouge, Louisiana.

Defendants were not served until June of 2021, more than a year after the incident occurred. Officer Amrine, the Town of Welsh, and the Welsh Police Department were served on June 3, 2021. Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company was served on June 7, 2021.

On July 7, 2021, Defendants filed an Exception of Improper Venue, asserting that La.R.S. 13:5104(B) mandates that any suit against a political subdivision of the state or officer thereof within the course and scope of his employment be instituted before the district court in which the political subdivision is located, or in the district court having jurisdiction in the parish where the cause of action arises. Defendants claimed that because the Town of Welsh is located in Jefferson Davis Parish, venue was proper in Jefferson Davis Parish. Defendants similarly claimed that venue was proper in Jefferson Davis Parish because Officer Amrine was in the course and scope of his employment as an officer of a political subdivision (located in Welsh, Jefferson Davis Parish).

On April 19, 2022, Plaintiffs filed a First Supplemental and Amending Petition, adding a new paragraph alleging that Mr. Stroder sustained his damages in Calcasieu Parish, as he was treated at Lake Charles Memorial Hospital located in Calcasieu Parish and therefore incurred medical expenses (i.e., damages) in Calcasieu Parish.

On May 20, 2022, Judge Ritchie of the Fourteenth Judicial District in Calcasieu Parish granted Defendants' Exception of Improper Venue and transferred the matter to the Thirty-First Judicial District Court in Jefferson Davis Parish.

On September 19, 2022, the Welsh Police Department filed an exception of lack of procedural capacity, asserting that it is not a juridical person and therefore lacks the procedural capacity to be sued. On that same date, the Town of Welsh and Officer David Amrine filed a peremptory exception of prescription, claiming that the lawsuit was prescribed because Defendants were not served within the one-year peremptory period. In support, Defendants cited La.Civ.Code art. 3462.

After a hearing on October 25, 2022, and in a judgment signed on December 5, 2022, Judge Gunnell granted Defendants' peremptory exception of prescription, Welsh Police Department's exception of lack of procedural capacity, and Defendants' motion to strike jury and bifurcate trial. The only pleading objected to by Plaintiffs was Defendants' exception of prescription. It is the prescription ruling which Plaintiffs now appeal, asserting that the district judge improperly granted Defendants' exception of prescription.

ANALYSIS

The standard of review of a judgment on a peremptory exception of prescription depends on whether evidence was introduced at the hearing. Mitchell v. Baton Rouge Orthopedic Clinic LLC, 21-61 (La. 12/10/21), 333 So.3d 368. If no evidence is introduced, then the exception is decided upon the facts alleged in the petition, with all allegations in the petition accepted as true. Id. The reviewing court assesses whether the trial court was legally correct in its ruling. When evidence is introduced at the hearing, the trial court's decision is reviewed under the manifest error standard of review. The exception to this is when there is no dispute regarding the material facts. In such a case, the reviewing court applies the de novo standard of review. Id.

In this case, evidence was introduced at the hearing on the exception of prescription. However, there is no dispute regarding the material facts; namely, that the accident occurred on May 23, 2020, Plaintiffs filed their petition for damages on May 18, 2021, and Defendants were served on June 3, 2021 and June 7, 2021. Therefore, the de novo standard of review applies.

Louisiana Civil Code Article 3492 provides that "[d]elictual actions are subject to a liberative prescription of one year," commencing on the date when the injury occurs or damage is sustained. In this case, the injury and damage occurred on May 23, 2020, and thus the prescriptive period is one year from that date.

Plaintiffs filed their petition for damages within the prescriptive period, on May 18, 2021. It is undisputed that Plaintiffs timely filed the suit in Calcasieu Parish. However, the issue is whether Plaintiffs timely filed their suit in Jefferson

Davis Parish. When an action is filed...

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex