Books and Journals Table of Cases

Table of Cases

Document Cited Authorities (467) Cited in Related

TABLE OF CASES

This table lists cases cited in the deskbook. Washington state cases are listed first. Cases from other states are listed next in alphabetical order by jurisdiction. These are followed by federal court cases. Miscellaneous categories are listed last. Each citation is followed by a colon and the section(s) in the chapter(s) of the deskbook in which the citation is found.

WASHINGTON

A____________________________________________________________________

Absher Constr. Co. v. Kent Sch. Dist., 79 Wn. App. 841, 917 P.2d 1086 (1995): 3.3(1)(a), 3.4(3), 8.4(5)

AGM, In re Settlement/Guardianship of, 154 Wn. App. 58, 223 P.3d 1276 (2010): 3.5(3)

Am. States Ins. Co. ex rel. Kommavongsa v. Nammathao, 153 Wn. App. 461, 220 P.3d 1283 (2009): 9.3(2)

Amoss v. Univ. of Wash., 40 Wn. App. 666, 700 P.2d 350 (1985): 13.3(2)(a), 13.3(3)(a)

Ang v. Martin, 154 Wn.2d 477, 114 P.3d 637 (2005): 14.2

Anschell (Anschell I), In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against, 141 Wn.2d 593, 9 P.3d 193 (2000): 8.2(1)

Anschell (Anschell II), In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against, 149 Wn.2d 484, 69 P.3d 844 (2003): 8.2(1), 11.4(8)

Arden v. Forsberg & Umlauf, P.S., 189 Wn.2d 315, 402 P.3d 245 (2017): 10.3(5)

Arden v. Forsberg & Umlauf, P.S., 193 Wn. App. 731, 373 P.3d 320, review granted, 186 Wn.2d 1009 (2016): 14.2(2)

Aubin v. Barton, 123 Wn. App. 592, 98 P.3d 126 (2004): 14.2(4)

Ausler v. Ramsey, 73 Wn. App. 231, 868 P.2d 877 (1994): 3.5(2), 3.7(4)(b)

B____________________________________________________________________

Barbee v. Luong Firm, 126 Wn. App. 148, 107 P.3d 762 (2005): 9.3(2)

Barr v. Day, 124 Wn.2d 318, 879 P.2d 912 (1994): 3.7(3), 6.3(3)(b), 14.3

Beckman v. Wilcox, 96 Wn. App. 355, 979 P.2d 890 (1999): 3.4(3)

Behnke v. Ahrens, 172 Wn. App. 281, 294 P.3d 729 (2012), review denied, 177 Wn.2d 1003 (2013): 14.3(2), 14.4(1)

Belli v. Shaw, 29 Wn. App. 875, 631 P.2d 980 (1981), aff'd, 98 Wn.2d 569, 657 P.2d 315 (1983): 1.2(3), 2.3(1)(b)

Berryman v. Metcalf, 177 Wn. App. 644, 312 P.3d 745 (2013): 3.4(3), 3.4(4), 3.7(2)

Bishop v. Jefferson Title Co., 107 Wn. App. 833, 28 P.3d 802 (2001), review denied, 145 Wn.2d 1025 (2002): 14.1

Blair v. Wash. State Univ., 108 Wn.2d 558, 740 P.2d 1379 (1987): 9.5

[Page TC-1]

Blanchard, In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against, 158 Wn.2d 317, 144 P.3d 286 (2006): 8.3(2), 15.6(3)

Boelter, In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against, 139 Wn.2d 81, 985 P.2d 328 (1999): 3.4(4), 7.3, 7.5, 7.7(5)

Bohn v. Cody, 119 Wn.2d 357, 832 P.2d 71 (1992): 1.2(1), 1.2(2), 1.2(3), 1.2(4)(b), 1.3(2), 2.4(2), 2.4(3), 7.3(1), 10.2, 11.2(1), 12.8, 14.2(1)(a), 14.2(1)(b), 18.3

Bonet, In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against, 144 Wn.2d 502, 29 P.3d 1242 (2001): 9.5

Botimer, In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against, 166 Wn.2d 759, 214 P.3d 133 (2009): 7.2

Bowman v. Two, 104 Wn.2d 181, 704 P.2d 140 (1985): 14.2

Brothers, In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against, 149 Wn.2d 575, 70 P.3d 940 (2003): 3.4(4)

Brust v. Newton, 70 Wn. App. 286, 852 P.2d 1092 (1993), review denied, 123 Wn.2d 1010 (1994): 14.2(3), 14.2(4), 14.2(4)(a), 14.2(4)(b)

Bullard v. Bailey, 91 Wn. App. 750, 959 P.2d 1122 (1998), review denied, 137 Wn.2d 1014 (1999): 8.4(6), 14.2(3), 14.2(4)(a), 14.2(4)(b)

Burtch, In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against, 112 Wn.2d 19, 770 P.2d 174 (1989): 8.2, 8.3(2)

Bush v. O'Connor, 58 Wn. App. 138, 791 P.2d 915, review denied, 115 Wn.2d 1020 (1990): 8.2, 17.5

Busk v. Flanders, 2 Wn. App. 526, 468 P.2d 695 (1970): 14.4(2)

C____________________________________________________________________

Carmick, In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against, 146 Wn.2d 582, 48 P.3d 311 (2002): 9.4(1), 9.4(4), 12.6

Carpenter, In re Discipline of, 160 Wn.2d 16, 155 P.3d 937 (2007): 4.3(1)

Cawdrey v. Hanson Baker Ludlow Drumheller, P.S., 129 Wn. App. 810, 120 P.3d 605 (2005), review denied, 157 Wn.2d 1004 (2006): 14.3(3)

Chism v. Tri-State Constr., Inc., 193 Wn. App. 818, 374 P.3d 193, review denied, 186 Wn.2d 1013 (2016): 3.3(3)

City of Seattle v. Blume, 134 Wn.2d 243, 947 P.2d 223 (1997): 14.2(4)(b)

City of Seattle v. McKenna, 172 Wn.2d 551, 259 P.3d 1087 (2011): 13.3(1)(a)

Clark Cnty. Fire Dist. No. 5 v. Bullivant Houser Bailey, P.C., 180 Wn. App. 689, 324 P.3d 743, review denied sub nom. Am. Alt. Ins. Corp. v. Bullivant Houser Bailey, P.C., 181 Wn.2d 1008 (2014): 10.3(5), 14.2(2)

Cohen, In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against, 149 Wn.2d 323, 67 P.3d 1086 (2003): 3.4(4)

Cohen, In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against, 150 Wn.2d 744, 82 P.3d 224 (2004): 4.3(2)

Commercial Credit v. Wollgast, 11 Wn. App. 117, 521 P.2d 1191 (1974): 3.4(3)

Cotton v. Kronenberg, 111 Wn. App. 258, 44 P.3d 878 (2002), review denied, 148 Wn.2d 1011 (2003): 2.3(2), 3.3(2)(d), 3.4(2), 3.6, 11.4(1), 14.4(1)

Crane Co. v. Paul, 15 Wn. App. 212, 548 P.2d 337 (1976): 3.7(4)(d)(i)

[Page TC-2]

Cruz v. Chavez, 186 Wn. App. 913, 347 P.3d 912 (2015): 9.4(4)

D____________________________________________________________________

Dailey v. Testone, 72 Wn.2d 662, 435 P.2d 24 (1967): 3.5(2)

Dann, In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against, 136 Wn.2d 67, 960 P.2d 416 (1998): 3.7(1)

Danzig v. Danzig, 79 Wn. App. 612, 904 P.2d 312 (1995), review denied, 129 Wn.2d 1011 (1996): 2.3(1)(b)

Daugert v. Pappas, 104 Wn.2d 254, 704 P.2d 600 (1985): 14.2(4), 14.2(4)(a), 14.2(4)(b)

Davis v. Davis Wright Tremaine, L.L.P., 103 Wn. App. 638, 14 P.3d 146 (2000), review denied, 147 Wn.2d 1019 (2001): 2.4(3), 14.4(2)

DeRuiz, In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against, 152 Wn.2d 558, 99 P.3d 881 (2004): 4.6

Dietz v. Doe, 131 Wn.2d 835, 935 P.2d 611 (1997): 7.2, 7.7(6)

Dixon v. Crawford, McGilliard, Peterson & Yelish, 163 Wn. App. 912, 262 P.3d 108 (2011), review denied, 173 Wn.2d 1015 (2012): 6.4

Doctors Co. v. Bennett Bigelow & Leedom, P.S., 187 Wn. App. 1034, No. 72163-1-I, 2015 WL 3385264 (May 26, 2015): 1.3(2)

Dynan, In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against, 152 Wn.2d 601, 98 P.3d 444 (2004): 3.7(1), 9.1

E____________________________________________________________________

Egger, In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against, 152 Wn.2d 393, 98 P.3d 477 (2004): 1.2(1), 1.2(2), 1.2(3), 7.3(1), 14.2(1)(a)

Engstrom v. Goodman, 166 Wn. App. 905, 271 P.3d 959, review denied, 175 Wn.2d 1004 (2012): 9.4(4), 9.6(1)

Eriks v. Denver, 118 Wn.2d 451, 824 P.2d 1207 (1992): 2.4(3), 3.6, 11.1, 14.2, 14.2(2), 14.4(1), 14.4(3)

Estate of Treadwell ex rel. Neil v. Wright, 115 Wn. App. 238, 61 P.3d 1214, review denied, 149 Wn.2d 1035 (2003): 14.2(1)(b)

Eugster, In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against, 166 Wn.2d 293, 209 P.3d 435 (2009): 7.7(9), 19.5(2)

F____________________________________________________________________

Falkner v. Foshaug, 108 Wn. App. 113, 29 P.3d 771 (2001): 14.2

Fechner v. Volyn, 3 Wn. App. 2d 716, 418 P.3d 120 (2018): 1.2(1)

Felice, In re, 112 Wn.2d 520, 772 P.2d 505 (1989): 8.3(1)

Firestorm 1991, In re, 129 Wn.2d 130, 916 P.2d 411 (1996): 9.2(2), 9.2(4)

First Small Bus. Inv. Co. of Cal. v. Intercapital Corp. of Or., 108 Wn.2d 324, 738 P.2d 263 (1987): 11.5(3)

Flint v. Hart, 82 Wn. App. 209, 917 P.2d 590 (1996): 14.2(3), 14.2(4)(a)

Foss Maritime Co. v. Brandewiede, 190 Wn. App. 186, 359 P.3d 905 (2015), review denied, 185 Wn.2d 1012 (2016): 9.2(4)

[Page TC-3]

French v. Gabriel, 116 Wn.2d 584, 806 P.2d 1234 (1991): 14.3(3)

Fuqua v. Fuqua, 88 Wn.2d 100, 558 P.2d 801 (1977): 3.7(4)(e)(ii)

G____________________________________________________________________

Garner v. Cherberg, 111 Wn.2d 811, 765 P.2d 1284 (1988): 13.3(2)(a)

Gillingham, In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against, 126 Wn.2d 454, 896 P.2d 656 (1995): 11.4(1)

Goldmark v. McKenna, 172 Wn.2d 568, 259 P.3d 1095 (2011): 10.3(3), 13.3(1)(a)

Gold Seal Chinchillas, Inc. v. State, 69 Wn.2d 828, 420 P.2d 698 (1966): 13.3(7)(a)

Gomez, In re Personal Restraint of, 180 Wn.2d 337, 325 P.3d 142 (2014): 21.3(6), 21.4

Gottstein v. Harrington, 25 Wash. 508, 65 P. 753 (1901): 3.7(4)(d)(iii), 6.3(4)(c)

Greenlee, In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against, 158 Wn.2d 259, 143 P.3d 807 (2006): 14.3

Griswold v. Kilpatrick, 107 Wn. App. 757, 27 P.3d 246 (2001): 14.2(4)(b)

Grubb, In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against, 99 Wn.2d 690, 663 P.2d 1346 (1983): 3.3(2)(d)

H____________________________________________________________________

Hahn v. Boeing Co., 95 Wn.2d 28, 621 P.2d 1263 (1980): 2.2, 17.4(1)

Haley, In re Disiplinary Proceeding Against, 156 Wn.2d 324, 126 P.3d 1262 (2006): 9.4(1), 9.4(4), 9.6(1)

Hall, In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against, 180 Wn.2d 821, 329 P.3d 870 (2014): 3.4(4), 4.6, 11.4(3)

Hallman v. Sturm Ruger & Co., 31 Wn. App. 50, 639 P.2d 805 (1982): 17.4(1)

Halverson, In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against, 140 Wn.2d 475, 998 P.2d 833 (2000): 11.4(8)

Halvorsen v. Ferguson, 46 Wn. App. 708, 735 P.2d 675 (1986), review denied, 108 Wn.2d 1008 (1987): 14.2(4)(b)

Hangman Ridge Training Stables, Inc. v. Safeco Title Ins. Co., 105 Wn.2d 778, 719 P.2d 531 (1986): 14.4(3)

Hankin, In re, 116 Wn.2d 293, 804 P.2d 30 (1991): 17.1

Hansen v. Wightman, 14 Wn. App. 78, 538 P.2d 1238 (1975): 14.2, 14.2(2), 14.2(3), 14.3(1), 14.3(2)

Harris v. Griffith, 2 Wn. App. 2d 638, 413 P.3d 51 (2018): 1.2(3), 12.2(4)

Harris v. Pierce County, 84 Wn. App. 222, 928 P.2d 1111 (1996): 13.3(2)(a)

Haskell, In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against, 136 Wn.2d 300, 960 P.2d 813 (1998): 3.7(1)

Heard, In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against, 136 Wn.2d 405, 963 P.2d 818 (1998): 3.3(2)(d), 8.2(3), 12.3

Herring v. Dep't of Social & Health Servs., 81 Wn. App. 1, 914 P.2d 67 (1996): 3.4(3)

[Page TC-4]

Hetzel v. Parks, 93 Wn. App. 929, 971 P.2d 115 (1999): 1.3(2), 14.2(1)(b), 14.2(2), 14.4(1)

Hicks v. Edwards, 75 Wn. App. 156, 876 P.2d 953 (1994), review denied, 125 Wn.2d 1015 (1995): 10.3(1)

Hines v. Data Line Sys., Inc., 114 Wn.2d 127, 787 P.2d 8 (1990): 14.4

Hipple v. McFadden, 161 Wn. App. 550, 255 P.3d 730, review denied, 172 Wn.2d 1009 (2011): 10.2, 14.3(3)

Hizey v. Carpenter, 119 Wn.2d 251, 830 P.2d 646 (1992): 14.2, 14.2(1)(a), 14.2(2), 14.3(1), 14.4(1)

Holman v. Coie, 11 Wn. App. 195, 522 P.2d 515, review denied, 84 Wn.2d 1011 (1974), cert....

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex