143471 Canada Inc. v. Quebec (Attorney General), [1994] 2 S.C.R. 339 ..........118, 121
Alabama v. White, 110 S. Ct. 2412 at 2416 (1990)....................................................94
Attorney-General of Quebec v. Canadian Broadcasting Corp., [1991]
3 S.C.R. 421, 67 C.C.C. (3d) 517..............................................99, 130, 131–32, 327
Baron v. Canada, [1993] 1 S.C.R. 416, 99 D.L.R. (4th) 350,
78 C.C.C. (3d) 510 ........................................................................94, 119, 145, 147
Bisaillon v. Keable, [1983] 2 S.C.R. 60, 2 D.L.R. (4th) 193,
7 C.C.C. (3d) 385 ........................................................................162, 164, 166, 170
Blouin v. Canada, [1991] F.C.J. No. 1171, 51 F.T.R. 194 (T.D.)..............................5, 291
British Columbia Securities Commission v. Branch, [1995] 2 S.C.R. 3, 123
D.L.R. (4th) 462, 97 C.C.C. (3d) 505 ........60, 85, 99, 116, 117, 118, 119–20, 124
Brown v. Durham Regional Police Force (1998), 43 O.R. (3d) 223,
167 D.L.R. (4th) 672 (C.A.) ..............................................................................246
Canada (Attorney General) v. Several Clients and Several Solicitors (2000),
189 N.S.R. (2d) 313, 2002 NSCA 44..........................................................182, 183
Canada Post Corp. v. Canada (Attorney General), [1995] O.J. No. 126,
95 C.C.C. (3d) 568 (Gen. Div.) ..........................................................................194
Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. Attorney-General for New Brunswick et al.,
399
c
Table of Cases
CanadianOxy Chemicals Ltd. v. Canada, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 743, (1998),
171 D.L.R. (4th) 733, 133 C.C.C. (3d) 426 ............................................................91
CBC v. Dagenais, [1994] 3 S.C.R. 835, 120 D.L.R. (4th) 12 ....................................166
Chartier v. The Attorney-General of Quebec, [1979] 2 S.C.R. 474,
104 D.L.R. (3d) 321, 48 C.C.C. (2d) 34 ..............................................................142
Cloutier v. Langlois, [1990] 1 S.C.R. 158, 53 C.C.C. (3d) 257 ..........99, 199, 233, 234,
....................................................................................................235, 236, 237, 250
Codd v. Cabe (1876), 1 Ex. D. 352, 45 L.J. M.C. 101..................................................198
Comité paritaire de l’industrie de la chemise v. Potash; R. v. Potash,
[1994] 2 S.C.R. 406, 115 D.L.R. (4th) 702, 91 C.C.C. (3d) 371 ........118, 121, 286
Cottrell Transport Inc. v. Director of Investigation & Research (1987),
19 C.P.R. (3d) 117 (Ont. H.C.J.), aff’d (1988), 26 O.A.C. 378 ..........................372
Cuddy Chicks Ltd. v. Ontario (Labour Relations Board) (1991),
81 D.L.R. (4th) 121, [1991] 2 S.C.R. 5, 50 Admin. L.R. 44 ..............................265
Dalglish v. Jarvie (1850), 2 Mac. & G. 231, 42 E.R. 89 ....................................207, 312
Descôteaux v. Mierzwinski, [1982] 1 S.C.R. 860, 141 D.L.R. (3d) 590....178, 180, 181
Dow Chemical Co. v. United States, 476 U.S. 227, 106 S. Ct. 1819 (1986)............70
Dubois v. The Queen, [1986] 1 S.C.R. 366, 26 D.L.R. (4th) 481,
25 C.C.C. (3d) 221 ..............................................................................................298
Eccles v. Bourque, [1975] 2 S.C.R. 739, (1974) 50 D.L.R. (3d) 753,
19 C.C.C. (2d) 129 ................................................................................95, 195, 285
Eddy v. Moore, 5 Wash. App. 334 (1971)......................................................................56
Eldridge v. British Columbia (Attorney General), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 624,
151 D.L.R. (4th) 577 ..............................................................................................18
Entick v. Carrington, (1765), 19 State Tr. 1029..............................................2, 90, 102
Festing v. Canada (Attorney General) (2003), 172 C.C.C. (3d) 321 (B.C.C.A.),
(2001) 206 D.L.R. (4th) 98, (2000) 31 C.R. (5th) 203
(B.C.S.C.)......................................................................182, 183, 185, 186, 187, 188
Fieldhouse v. Kent Institution (1995), 98 C.C.C. (3d) (B.C.C.A.)............................375
Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154 (1978) ..................................................................213
Gallaird v. Laxton (1862), 2 B. & S. 363, 31 L.J. M.C. 123, 9 Cox C.C. 127,
121 E.R. 1109 ......................................................................................................198
Hunter et al. v. Southam Inc., [1984] 2 S.C.R. 145, 14 C.C.C. (3d) 97,
11 D.L.R. (4th) 641....................2, 6, 16, 26, 27, 37, 84, 89, 95, 96, 98, 99, 119,
............................................................121, 126, 143, 144, 145, 189, 220, 233, 286
Illinois v. Rodriguez, 110 S. Ct. 2793 (1990)....................................................221, 232
400 • Understanding Section 8: Search, Seizure, and the Canadian Constitution
