Books and Journals Religious Institutions and The Law in Canada. Fourth Edition Irwin Books Table of cases

Table of cases

Document Cited Authorities (211) Cited in Related
421
TABLE OF CASES
A.(A.) v. B.(B.) (2007), 278 D.L.R. (4th) 519 (Ont. C.A.) ....................................400
A.(T.W.N.) v. Clarke; T.W.N.A. v. Clarke (2003), 235 D.L.R. (4th) 13
(B.C.C .A.) ............................................................................................. 334, 335
A.C. v. Manitoba (Director of Child and Fa mily Services), 2009 SCC 30 .........404
A.G. B.C. v. Astaforoff, [1993] 6 W.W.R. 322 (B.C.S.C.), aff’d [1984]
4 W.W.R. 385 (B.C.C.A.) .............................................................................. 188
A.G. B.C. v. Cowichan School Distr ict No. 65 (1985),
19 D.L.R. (4th) 166 (B.C.S.C.) .....................................................................35 4
A.G. Canada v. A.G. Ontario, [1937] A.C. 326 (P.C.) ................................. 120 , 165
A.G. N.S. v. A.G. Canada, [1951] S.C.R. 31 .........................................................105
A.G. Nova Scotia v. Avery (1877), R.E.D. 253 (N.S.T.D.) ....................................300
A.G. Ontario v. A.G. Canada, [1896] A.C. 348 (P.C.) ..................................116, 117
A.G. Ontario v. Canada Temperance Fede ration, [1946] A.C. 193 (P.C.) ...........117
A.G. Ontario v. Christ ie (1867), 13 Gr. 495 (Ch.) .......................................265, 307
A.G. Ontario v. Hamilton Str eet Railway Co., [1903]
A.C. 524 (P.C.) ..........................................................................10 4−5, 107, 118
A.G. Ontario v. Paul Magder Furs Ltd. (1989), 65 D.L.R.
(4th) 263 (Ont. H.C.) ............................................................................410 , 410
A.G. Ontario v. Paul Magder Furs Ltd. (1991), 85 D.L.R. (4th) 694
(Ont. C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused (1992),
91 D.L.R. (4th) viii (S.C.C.) ..................................................................411, 413
A.G. Quebec v. Centre horticole de la Pin ière Inc., [1989]
R.J .Q. 15 41 (S.C .) ......................................................................................... 410
A.G. Quebec v. Greater Hull School Board, [1984] 2 S.C.R. 575 ............... 129, 343
A.G. Upper Canada v. Grasett (1857), 6 Gr. 200 (U.C.C.A.) .............................. 235
A.G. Upper Canada v. Jeffrey (1863), 10 Gr. 273 (Ch.) ...............................244, 3 07
RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS AND T HE LAW IN CA NADA422
A.G. Upper Canada v. Lauder (1862), 9 Gr. 461 (U.C. Ch.) ...............................234
A.G. v. Anderson (1888), 57 L.J. Ch. 543 ...........................................................306
A.G. v. Aust (1865), 13 L.T. 235 ..........................................................................306
A.G. v. Bunce (1867), L.R. 6 Eq. 563 ...................................................................30 6
A.G. v. Gould (1860), 28 Beav. 485, 54 E.R. 452 ................................................306
A.G. v. Munro (1848), 2 De G. & Sm. 122, 64 E.R. 55 (V.C.) .....................30 6, 317
A.G. v. Murdoch (1849), 7 Hare 445, 68 E.R. 183 .............................................. 306
A.G. v. Murdoch (1852), 1 De G.M. & G. 86, 42 E.R. 484 (L.JJ.) ........................317
A.G. v. Pearson (1817), 3 Mer. 351, 36 E.R. 135 .................................................306
A.G. v. St. John’s Hospital, Bath (1876), 2 Ch. 554 .............................................306
A.G. v. Stewart (1872), L.R. 14 Eq. 17 .................................................................306
A.G. v. Wahr-Hansen, [2000] 3 All E.R. 642 (P.C.) ............................................ 299
A.G. v. Welsh (1844), 4 Hare 572, 67 E.R. 775 (V.C.) .........................................317
Abbey v. Abbey, 1999 CanLII 5304 (B.C.S.C.) ................................................... 392
Abrahams v. Carey, [1967] 3 All E.R. 179 (Q.B.D.) ............................................. 169
Abrahams v. The Queen, 2013 TCC 391 ............................................................283
Abrams v. North Shore Free Pres s Ltd. (No. 3) (1999),
33 C.H.R.R. D/435 (B.C. Trib.); 2001 BCCA 22........................................... 159
Action by Chri stians for the Abolition of Torture v. Canada (2002),
225 D.L.R. (4th) 99 (F.C.A.) ........................................................................280
Adam v. M.N.R. (1974), 74 D.T.C. 1220 (T.A.B.) ................................................. 283
Adler v. Ontario (1996), 140 D.L.R. (4th) 385
(S.C.C .) ....................................................123, 127, 130, 132, 137, 141, 347, 377
Afovia v. The Queen, 2012 TCC 391 ...................................................................280
Agudath Isr ael of Toronto v. Town of Ori llia, [1962] O.R. 305 (C.A.) ............... 275
Ainleyv ille Wesleyan Methodist Church Trustee s v. Grewer (1874),
23 U.C.C.P. 533 (C.A.) ..........................................................................244, 261
Aird v. Johnson, [1929] 4 D.L.R. 664 (Ont. C.A.) .............................................. 313
Akinbo v. The Queen, 2014 TCC 214 .................................................................280
Alberta v. Hutterite Bret hren of Wilson Colony,
2009 SCC 37 ..........................................................111, 113, 114, 115, 14 4, 149
Alemu v. R. (1999), 99 D.T.C. 714 (T.C.C.) .................................................282, 284
Alfred Crompton Amu sement Machines Ltd. v. Customs and Excise
Commissioner s, [1974] A.C. 405 (H.L.) ...................................................... 213
Allen v. Renfrew (County) (2004), 48 M.P.L.R. (3d) 26 (Ont. S.C.J.) ................ 155
Alliance for Li fe v. M.N.R. (1999), 174 D.L.R. (4th) 442 (F.C.A.) ...................... 279
Amey v. Kingston Orpha n’s Home (1910), 2 O.W.N. 111 (H.C.) .........................301
Amlani v. Hiran i (2000), 194 D.L.R. (4th) 543 (B.C.S.C.) .................................388
Ampomah v. The Queen, 2014 TCC 217 ............................................................280
Anderson v. Dougall (1867), 13 Gr. 164 (Ch.) ....................................................295
Anderson v. Gislason, [1920] 3 W.W.R. 301 (Man. C.A.) ................................... 307
Anderson v. Kilborn (1875), 22 Gr. 385 (H.C.) ..................................................298
Anderson v. Worters (1882), 32 U.C.C.P. 659 (H.C.).......................................... 237
Andrews v. Law Society of Br itish Columbia (1989),
56 D.L.R. (4th) 1 (S.C.C.) ............................................................................ 152
Table of Cases 423
Arab Muslim As sn. v. Canadi an Islamic Centre (2004),
246 D.L.R. (4th) 351 (Alta. Q.B.) ................................................................. 270
Arbeau v. R. (1985), 21 C.R.R. 354 (Nf‌ld. C.A.) .................................................366
Archer v. Society of the Sacre d Heart of Jesus (1905),
9 O.L.R. 474 (C.A.) .......................................................................220, 232, 331
Armstrong v. Church Soc iety of the Diocese of Toronto (1867),
13 Gr. 552 (Ch.) ....................................................................................237, 246
Arthur Roma n Catholic Separate School Section No. 10 v. Township of
Arthur (1891), 21 O.R. 60 (C.A.) .................................................................356
Ash v. Ash (1994), 8 R.F.L. (4th) 461 (B.C.C.A.) ................................................386
Ash v. Methodist Church (1901), 31 S.C.R. 497 .......................... 231, 316, 319, 320
Asher v. Calcraft (1887), 18 Q.B.D. 607 .............................................................. 170
Assiniboi ne South Teachers’ As sociation of the Manitoba Teachers’
Society v. Assinib oine South School Division No. 3 (2000),
187 D.L.R. (4th) 385 (Man. C.A.) ................................................................ 374
Assn. des det aillants en alimentat ion du Quebec v. Ferme Car naval Inc.,
[1986] R.J.Q. 2513 (S.C.) .......................................................................411, 412
Associat ion A.D.G.Q. v. Montreal Cat holic School Board (1979),
112 D.L.R. (3d) 230 (Que. S.C.) ................................................................... 267
Atcheson v. Everitt (1776), 1 Cowp. 382, 98 E.R. 1142 ...............................210, 211
Attorney-Genera l v. Bradlaugh (1885), 14 Q.B.D. 667 (C.A.) .............................209
Attorney-Genera l v. Christie (1867), 13 Gr. 495 (Ch.) ...............................265, 307
Atwal v. Shoker, [2005] B.C.J. No. 1471 (S.C.) ....................................................230
Atwell v. M.N.R. (1967), 67 D.T.C. 611 (T.A.B.) .................................................283
Aubry v. R. (1976), 76 D.T.C. 6343 (F.C.T.D.) ..................................................... 2 81
Augustini an Fathers (Ontario) Inc. v. Ontario Regional Ass essment
Commissioner Re gion No. 14 (1985), 52 O.R. (2d) 536 (H.C.) .................. 276
Austin v. R. (1999), 99 D.T.C. 710 (T.C.C.) .........................................................283
Avitan v. Avitan (1992), 38 R.F.L. (3d) 382 (Ont. Gen. Div.) ............................. 392
Azam v. Jam, 2013 ABQB 301 ....................................................................... 18 0– 81
Azim v. University of Ca lgary Faculty Associat ion (2001),
266 A.R. 255 (C.A.) .......................................................................................381
B.(E.) v. Order of the Oblates of Ma ry Immaculate in the Pr ovince of
British Columbi a (2005), 258 D.L.R. (4th) 385 (S.C.C.)..............................337
B.(G.) v. B.(M.) (1988), 19 R.F.L. (3d) 283 (Que. C.A.) .......................................391
B.(K.L.) v. British Columbi a (2003), 230 D.L.R. (4th) 513 (S.C.C.) ....................337
B.(L.) v. C.(J.) (1991), 91 D.L.R. (4th) 27 (Que. C.A.), leave to appeal
to S.C.C. refused (1993), 105 D.L.R. (4th) vi (S.C.C.) ......................... 393, 396
B.(M.) v. British Columbia (2003), 230 D.L.R. (4th) 567 (S.C.C.) ......................337
B.M. v. Mumford, [2000] B.C.J. No. 2490, 2000 BCSC 1787 ..................... 320, 33 4
Bachor v. Lehman-Bachor (2001), 14 R.F.L. (5th) 238 (Alta. C.A.) ................... 392
Bailey v. Lethbridge Scho ol District No. 7, [1940] 1 D.L.R. 761 (Alta. T.D.) ......351
Bal v. Ontario (A.G.) (1994), 21 O.R. (3d) 681, 121 D.L.R.
(4th) 96 (Gen. Div.), aff’d (1997), 101 O.A.C. 219 (C.A.) .....131, 160, 347, 372

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex