432
TABLE OF CASES
Alberta (Attor ney General) v. Putnam, [1981] 2 S.C.R. 267, 62 C.C.C.
(2d) 51, [1981] S.C.J. No. 85 ............................................................................9
Alder v. Alberta (Attorney Ge neral) (1977), 5 A.R. 473, 37 C.C.C.
(2d) 234, [1977] A.J. No. 756 (S.C.T.D.) ........................................................ 75
Amax Potash Ltd . v. Saskatchewan (1976), [1977] 2 S.C.R. 576, 71 D.L.R.
(3d) 1, [1976] S.C.J. No. 86 ............................................................................ 66
Application under s. 83.28 of the Cr iminal Code (Re),
Attorney General (Quebec) v. Cohen, [1979] 2 S.C.R. 305,
46 C.C.C. (2d) 473, [1979] S.C.J. No. 50 ..................................................... 277
Attorney General of Nova S cotia v. MacIntyre, [1982] 1 S.C.R. 175,
65 C.C.C. (2d) 129, [1982] S.C.J. No. 1 ......................................................... 76
Azoulay v. the Queen, [1952] 2 S.C.R. 495, 104 C.C.C. 97,
[1952] S.C.J. No. 39 ......................................................................................366
Baron v. Canada, [1993] 1 S.C.R. 416, 78 C.C.C. (3d) 510,
[1993] S.C.J. No. 6 .........................................................................................63
Basaraba s and Spek v. the Queen, [1982] 2 S.C.R. 730, 2 C.C.C.
(3d) 257, [1982] S.C.J. No. 96 ...............................................................28 4, 310
Bergeron v. Deschamps (1977), [1978] 1 S.C.R. 243, 33 C.C.C.
(2d) 461, [1977] S.C.J. No. 45 ........................................................................ 84
Bisaillon v. Keable, [1983] 2 S.C.R. 60, 7 C.C.C. (3d) 385,
[1983] S.C.J. No. 65......................................................................................2 31
Boulet v. the Queen (1976), [1978] 1 S.C.R. 332, 34 C.C.C.
(2d) 397, [1976] S.C.J. No. 116.....................................................................36 8
British Columbi a Securities Commiss ion v. Branch,
Table of Cases 433
Brown v. Durham Regiona l Police Force (1998), 43 O.R. (3d) 223,
21 C.R. (5th) 1, [1998] O.J. No. 5274 (C.A.) ......................................... 198–99
Canada (Attorne y General) v. Canadi an National Transportation Ltd.;
Canada (Attorne y General) v. Canadi an Pacific Transport Co.,
Canada (Attorne y General) v. Khawaja, 20 07 FCA 342 .................................... 238
Canada ( Justice) v. Khadr, 2008 SCC 28 ............................................... 50, 51, 218
Canada (Min ister of Citizenship and Imm igration) v. Tobiass,
Canada Post Cor p. v. Canada (Attorney Gener al) (1995), 95 C.C.C.
(3d) 568, [1995] O.J. No. 126 (Gen. Div.) ...................................................136
Canadia n Broadcasting Corp. v. Lessard, [1991] 3 S.C.R. 421,
67 C.C.C. (3d) 517, [1991] S.C.J. No. 87 ......................................................128
Canadia n Broadcasting Corp. v. New Brunswic k (Attorney Gener al),
Canadia n Broadcasting Corp. v. New Brunswic k (Attorney
General), [1996] 3 S.C.R. 480, 110 C.C.C. (3d) 193,
[1996] S.C.J. No. 38 381 ................................................................ 28, 273, 381
Canadia n Broadcasting Corp. v. the Queen, 2011 SCC 3 ................................. 387
Canadia n Newspapers Co. v. Canada (Attorney General),
Canadia nOxy Chemicals Ltd. v. Canada (Attorne y General) (1998),
[1999] 1 S.C.R. 743, 133 C.C.C. (3d) 426, [1998] S.C.J. No. 87 .............. 6 4, 65
Cathro v. the Queen (1955), [1956] S.C.R. 101, 113 C.C.C. 225,
[1955] S.C.J. No. 70 ...................................................................................... 371
Charkaoui v. Canada (Citiz enship and Immigration), 2008 SCC 38 ............... 222
Cheyenne Realt y Ltd. v. Thompson (1974), [1975] 1 S.C.R. 87,
15 C.C.C. (2d) 49, [1974] S.C.J. No. 42 .......................................................409
Cloutier v. Langlois, [1990] 1 S.C.R. 158, 53 C.C.C.
(3d) 257, [1990] S.C.J. No. 10 ......................................14, 15, 107, 108–10, 111
Cody c. R. (2007), 228 C.C.C. (3d) 331, 51 C.R. (6th) 1,
2007 QCCA 1276 ...........................................................................................82
Collins v. Brantford Police Ser vices Board (2001), 151 O.A.C. 152,
158 C.C.C. (3d) 405, [2001] O.J. No. 3778 (C. A.) ......................................... 36
Colpitts v. the Queen (1965), [1965] S.C.R. 739, [1966] 1 C.C.C. 146,
[1965] S.C.J. No. 48 .....................................................................................405
Comité parita ire de l’industrie de la chemis e v. Potash; Comité
paritai re de l’industrie de la chemise c. Sé lection Milton,
Crimin al Code of Canada (Re), [2002] S.J. No. 54, 2002 SKPC 11 ...........136, 138
Dagenais v. Canadi an Broadcasting Corp., [1994] 3 S.C.R.
386– 87, 392, 393
Dallas & Ca ssidy v. the Queen (1985), 21 C.C.C. (3d) 100,
19 C.R.R. 145 (Ont. H.C.J.) ..........................................................................261
CRIMIN AL PROCEDURE
434
Descoteaux v. Mierzw inski, [1982] 1 S.C.R. 860, 70 C.C.C.
(2d) 385, [1982] S.C.J. No. 43 ........................................................ 85, 134, 234
Doucet-Boudreau v. Nova Scotia (Mini ster of Education), 2003 SCC 62 ........... 57
Duguay v. R., 2009 QCCA 1130 ......................................................................... 250
Eccles v. Bourque (1974), [1975] 2 S.C.R. 739, 19 C.C.C.
(2d) 129, [1974] S.C.J. No. 123 .............................................................. 16, 1 22
Fanjoy v. the Queen, [1985] 2 S.C.R. 233, 21 C.C.C. (3d) 312,
[1985] S.C.J. No. 55 ......................................................................................403
Frey v. Fedoruk, [1950] S.C.R. 517, 97 C.C.C. 1, [1950] S.C.J. No. 21 ...............198
Garton v. Whelan (1984), 47 O.R. (2d) 672, 14 C.C.C. (3d) 449,
[1984] O.J. No. 3325 (H.C.J.) .........................................................................47
Grabowski v. the Queen, [1985] 2 S.C.R. 434, 22 C.C.C. (3d) 449,
[1985] S.C.J. No. 66 .....................................................................................389
Gunn v. the Queen (1972), [1974] S.C.R. 273, 8 C.C.C. (2d) 185,
[1972] S.C.J. No. 120 ....................................................................................405
Hayes v. Thompson (1985), 60 B.C.L.R. 252, 44 C.R. (3d) 316,
[1985] B.C.J. No. 1904 (C.A.) ...................................................................... 198
Housen v. Nikolaisen, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235, 211 D.L.R. (4th) 577,
2002 SCC 33 ................................................................................................ 397
Hunter v. Southam, [1984] 2 S.C.R. 145, 14 C.C.C. (3d) 97,
[1984] S.C.J. No. 36 ................................................................................63 –64,
65, 69, 70, 71, 82, 83, 87, 88, 90, 103, 104, 107, 113, 124–28, 134, 138, 139
John v. the Queen, [1985] 2 S.C.R. 476, 23 C.C.C. (3d) 326,
[1985] S.C.J. No. 72 .....................................................................................35 8
Johnson v. Alberta (Attorney G eneral), [1954] S.C.R. 127, 108 C.C.C. 1,
[1954] S.C.J. No. 10 ........................................................................................25
Johnson v. Inglis (1980), 52 C.C.C. (2d) 385, 17 C.R. (3d) 250,
[1980] O.J. No. 1108 (H.C.J.) .........................................................................47
Keating v. Nova Scotia (Attorney G eneral) (2001), 194 N.S.R. (2d) 290,
42 Admin. L.R. (3d) 66, 2001 NSSC 85 ...................................................... 136
Knox Contracting L td. v. Canada, [1990] 2 S.C.R. 338, 58 C.C.C.
(3d) 65, [1990] S.C.J. No. 74 .......................................................................... 83
(2d) 65, [1982] S.C.J. No. 111 ...................................................................... 211
Kourtessis v. M.N.R., [1993] 2 S.C.R. 53, 81 C.C.C. (3d) 286,
[1993] S.C.J. No. 45 .......................................................................................83
Krieger v. Law Society of Al berta, 2002 SCC 65 ........................................... 45, 46
Lavallee, R ackel & Heintz v. Canada (Attorney General);
White, Ottenheime r & Baker v. Canad a (Attorney Genera l);
Lemay v. The King (1951), [1952] 1 S.C.R. 232, 102 C.C.C. 1,
[1951] S.C.J. No. 42 ...................................................................................... 35 4
MacMilla n Bloedel Ltd. v. Simpson Inc., [1995] 4 S.C.R. 725,
103 C.C.C. (3d) 225, [1995] S.C.J. No. 101 ............................................. 25, 42
McHale v. Ontario (Attorney G eneral), 2010 ONCA 361 .................................. 169
