Books and Journals Ethics and Criminal Law. Second Edition Irwin Books Table of cases

Table of cases

Document Cited Authorities (686) Cited in Related
661
TABLE OF CASES
1784049 Ontario Lt d (cob Alpha Care Studio 45) v Toronto (City),
2010 ONSC 1204 .........................................................................................19 5
2054476 Ontario Inc v 514052 Ontario Ltd, [2006] OJ No 4383 (SCJ) ............. 192
413528 Ontario Ltd v 951 Wilson Avenue Inc (1989), 71 OR (2d) 40,
[1989] OJ No 2599 (HCJ), appeal to Div Ct quashed ...........................421, 42 2
A(LL) v Beharriell , [1995] 4 SCR 536, 103 CCC (3d) 92,
[1995] SCJ No 102 .......................................................................................16 4
Adams v Law S ociety of Alberta, 2000 A BCA 240 .............................................306
Agnes Secur ities Ltd v British Columbia (1976), 70 DLR (3d) 504,
31 CCC (2d) 154, [1976] BCJ No 1292 (SC) .................................................181
Ahmadoun v Ont ario (AG), 2012 ONSC 955 ............................................. 432, 608
Airst v Airs t (1998), 37 OR (3d) 654, 21 CPC (4th) 146,
[1998] OJ No 2615 (Gen Div) ......................................................................190
Aldrich v State, 296 S W3d 225 (Tex App 2009) ................................................ 454
AM v Ryan, [1997] 1 SCR 157, 143 DLR (4th) 1, 1997 CanLII 403 ................... 312
Amato v Welsh, 2013 ONCA 258 ................................................................107, 26 4
Arthur JS Hal l & Co v Simons, [2000] 3 All ER 673 (HL)............................84, 107
Ashburton (Lord) v Pape, [1913] 2 Ch 469 (CA) ............................................... 190
Bank of Montreal v D resler, 2002 NBCA 69 ...................................................... 310
Barton v Nova Scoti a (AG), 2014 NSSC 192 ...............................................456, 46 8
Batchelor v Pattison and M ackersy (1876), 3 R 914 (Sess) .................................10 4
Baumgartner v B aumgartner (1995), 122 DLR (4th) 542,
2 BCLR (3d) 126, 1995 CanLII 2354 (CA) ..................................................308
Beckham v Com monwealth, 248 SW3d 547 (Ky 2008) ....................................425
Bell v Smith, [1968] SCR 664, 68 DLR (2d) 751, [1968] SCJ No 46 .................. 17 8
ETHICS AND CR IMINAL L AW662
Bezzeg v Bez zeg (1994), 153 NBR (2d) 212, 33 CPC (3d) 95,
[1994] NBJ No 437 (QB) ..............................................................................308
Blank v Can ada (Minister of Justice), 2006 SCC 39 ...........................161, 16 2, 163
Bledsoe v Law So ciety of British Columbia (1984), 11 DLR
(4th) 280, 13 CCC (3d) 560, [1984] BCJ No 1514 (CA) ............................. 615
Booth v Huxter (1994), 16 OR (3d) 528, 111 DLR (4th) 111,
[1994] OJ No 52 (Div Ct)..................................................................... 313, 32 0
Boreta v Prim rose Drilling Ventures Ltd, 2010 ABQB 383 ................................ 19 5
Bourgeois v Bolen, 200 4 ABQB 35 ......................................................................201
Brass v Can ada, 2011 FC 1102 (Proth)............................................................... 190
British Columbi a (AG) v Christie, 2007 SCC 21 ................................................. 23
British Columbi a (AG) v Davies, 2009 BCCA 337, leave to
appeal to SCC refus ed, [2009] SCCA No 421 ..................................... 600, 601
British Columbi a (Auditor General) v Brit ish Columbia
(Ministr y of AG), 2013 BCSC 98 .................................................................226
British Columbi a (Securitie s Commission) v Branch,
[1995] 2 SCR 3, 97 CCC (3d) 505, 1995 CanLII 142 ..........................505, 507
Brookville C arriers Flatbed GP Inc v Blackjack
Transport Ltd, 20 08 NSCA 22 .......................................214, 274, 286, 287−88
Brown v Commonwealt h, 226 SW3d 74 (Ky 2007) ..................................... 32 , 354
Brown v Doe, 2 F3d 1236 (2d Cir 1993),
cert denied 510 US 1125 (1994) .................................................................. 442
Brownell v Browne ll (1909), 42 SCR 368, [1909] SCJ No 51 .............................632
Butler v United States , 414 A2d 844 (DC 1980) ................................................363
Calcraft v Guest , [1898] 1 QB 759 (CA) ............................................................. 190
Canada (Citizen ship and Immigration) v Harkat, 2014 SCC 37 ................610, 639
Canada (MNR) v Thorton, 2012 FC 1313 ..........................................................19 0
Canada (Pr ivacy Commissioner) v Blood Tribe
Department of He alth, 2008 SCC 44 ...........................158, 161, 164, 248, 248
Canada Southe rn Petroleum v Amoco Canada
Petroleum Co (1997), 193 AR 273, 144 DLR (4th) 30,
[1997] AJ No 193 (CA), leave to appeal to SCC refu sed,
[1997] SCCA No 162 .................................................................................... 310
Canada v Solosk y (1979), [1980] 1 SCR 821,
50 CCC (2d) 495, 1979 CanLII 9 ................................. 160, 161, 164, 247, 248
Canadia n Blood Services v Freeman, 2 010 ONSC 4885 .................................... 243
Canadia n National Railway Co v McKercher LLP,
2013 SCC 39.........................................................................................6, 23, 44,
118, 164, 177, 214, 264, 266, 269, 274, 275−76, 287, 289, 306, 314, 323, 373,
419, 5 46
Canadia noxy Chemic al Ltd v Canada (AG), [1999] 1 SCR 743,
133 CCC (3d) 426, 1999 CanLII 6 80 ..........................................................525
Celanese Ca nada Inc v Murray Demolition Corp, 200 6 SCC 36,
rev’g (2004), 73 OR (3d) 64, 244 DLR (4th) 33,
[2004] OJ No 3983 (CA) ......................................................................192 , 193
Table of Cases 663
Chan v Dyn asty Executive Suites Ltd, [2006] OTC 650,
30 CPC (6th) 270, [2006] OJ No 2877 (SCJ) ....................................... 192 , 193
Chapelstone Development s Inc v Canada, 2004 NBCA 96 ............................... 19 0
Chiefs of Ontar io v Ontario (2003), 63 OR (3d) 335,
[2003] OJ No 580 (SCJ) ............................................................................... 320
Children’s Aid Societ y of Algoma v DP, 2006 ONCJ 170 ....................................201
Clark v State, 261 SW2d 339 (Tex Crim App 1953) ..................................504, 508
Clutchette v Rushen, 770 F2d 1469 (9th Cir 1985) ............................ 510, 519, 531
College of Physicians of Br itish Columbia v British Columbia
(Information and Pr ivacy Commissioner), 2002 BCCA 665 ......................158
Commonwealth v Alder man, 437 A2d 36 (Pa Super 1981) ........................... 32, 35
Commonwealth v Dow ney, 65 Mass App Ct 547 (2006) ...................................209
Commonwealth v Jermy n, 620 A2d 1128 (Pa 1993), cert denied,
510 US 1049 (1994) ..................................................................................... 354
Commonwealth v Ma scitti, 534 A2d 524 (Pa Super 1987) ........................354 , 364
Commonwealth v Mitchel l, 438 Mass 535, 781 NE2d 1237 (2003) ......32, 35, 354,
355, 363, 364
Commonwealth v Sten hach, 514 A2d 114 (Pa Super 1986),
appeal denied 534 A 2d 769 (1987) ...................................... 506, 514, 519, 531
Consulate Ventures Inc v A mico Contracting
& Engineeri ng (1992) Inc, 2010 ONCA 788 ........................ 214, 27 1, 274, 286
Côté v Rancourt, 20 04 SCC 58 ............................................ 118, 121, 267, 277, 320
Cowles v Balac (2006), 83 OR (3d) 660, 273 DLR (4th)
596, 2006 CanLII 3 4916 (CA), leave to appeal t o SCC
refused, [2006] SCCA No 496 .................................................................... 380
Davies, Ward & Beck v B aker and McKenzie (1998),
40 OR (3d) 257, 164 DLR (4th) 423, [1998] OJ No 3284 (CA) ................... 310
DB v British Columbi a (Director of Chi ld, Family and
Community Ser vice), 2002 BCCA 55 ..........................................................340
Dean v Dean, 6 07 So 2d 494 (Fla Di st Ct App 1992).........................................506
Demarco v Ungaro (1979), 21 OR (2d) 673, 95 DLR (3d) 385,
[1979] OJ No 4011 (HCJ) ........................................................................91, 107
Descôteaux v Mier zwinski, [1982] 1 SCR 860,
70 CCC (2d) 385, 1982 CanLII 22 ................................................ 16 0−61, 16 7,
169, 190, 247, 248, 249
Detlor v Brantford (City), 2013 ONCA 560 ........................................................409
Directeur des pou rsuites criminelles et p énales et
Shérif de la Cha mbre criminelle et pénale, 2010 QCCS 2362,
leave to appeal to C A refused, [2010] JQ No 10775 (CA)........................... 183
Dunkley v R, [1994] UKPC 32 ...........................................................................546
Everingham v O ntario (1992), 8 OR (3d) 121, 88 DLR (4th) 755,
[1992] OJ No 304 (Div Ct) .................................................................. 377, 580

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex