Sign Up for Vincent AI
Teats v. Phillips
Petitioner Jerome Maurice Teats, a pro se state prisoner, filed a petition for the writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. No. 1) with supporting facts and legal argument. (Doc. Nos. 4, 5). Respondent filed an Answer (Doc. No. 16) and Petitioner filed a Reply. (Doc. No. 23).[1] Petitioner submitted a motion to add fifteen documents to the record and the Court opted to consider these documents as appropriate when it considers the underling Petition. (Doc No. 26 at 2). Petitioner also filed motions to appoint counsel (Doc. No. 27), hold an evidentiary hearing (Doc. No 28), and amend the Petition. (Doc. No. 30). Respondent filed a Response in opposition to the Motion to Amend (Doc. No. 32), and Petitioner filed a Reply. (Doc. No. 34). The Court now considers the underlying Petition[2] and the pending motions. And as explained below, Petitioner is not entitled to relief under Section 2254, the pending motions will be DENIED, and this action will be DISMISSED.
Petitioner's state criminal case arose from an incident at a Shoney's restaurant in May 2009. See State v. Teats, No. M2012-01232-CCA-R3-CD, 2014 WL 98650, at *1 (Tenn. Crim. App. Jan. 10, 2014) (“Teats I”). The Tennessee Supreme Court summarized the basic facts of this incident as follows:
Shortly before six o'clock on the morning of May 18, 2009, Jerome Maurice Teats [(“Petitioner”)] and Tirrone Akillia Simpkins (“the accomplice”) forced their way into the back door of a Shoney's restaurant in Nashville. Armed with guns, they threatened four employees in the kitchen area, forced them to gather in a storage area in the back of the kitchen, and told them to put their heads down and not to move. As the accomplice guarded these employees, [Petitioner] forced the Shoney's manager to take him to the restaurant's money drawer. After taking the money, the intruders fled on foot but were soon apprehended by police.
State v. Teats, 468 S.W.3d 495, 496-97 (Tenn. 2015) (“Teats II”).
The court appointed Christopher Coats (“appointed counsel”) to represent Petitioner. (See Doc. No. 14-1 at 10-11). A Davidson County grand jury indicted then Petitioner and the accomplice for “aggravated robbery of the Shoney's manager and four counts of especially aggravated kidnapping of the four Shoney's employees.” Teats II, 468 S.W.3d at 497. The accomplice's “case was severed before trial, and he later pleaded guilty to all charges.” Id. at 497 n.1 (citing Simpkins v. State, No. M2012-01558-CCA-R3-PC, 2013 WL 775957, at *1 (Tenn. Crim. App. Feb. 28, 2013)).
In January 2010, appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw after Petitioner's family retained James Todd (“trial counsel”) to represent Petitioner. (Doc. No. 14-1 at 11-12). In February 2011, trial counsel filed a motion to suppress statements Petitioner made to police following his apprehension in May 2010. (Id. at 24-34). The court held a hearing (Doc. No. 14-4) and denied relief. (Doc. No. 14-1 at 43). As trial approached in late 2011, Petitioner retained Patrick McNally (“co-counsel”) to assist trial counsel. Teats v. State, No. M2017-00855-CCA-R3-PC, 2019 WL 76643, at *2, 5 (Tenn. Crim. App. Jan. 2, 2019) (“Teats III”).
The Tennessee Supreme Court summarized the State's evidence at trial as follows:
Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI
Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting