Sign Up for Vincent AI
Tenn. Traders Landing, LLC v. Jenkins & Stiles, LLC
Appeal from the Chancery Court for Knox County
Clarence E. Pridemore, Jr., Chancellor
This case involves a dispute concerning the validity of an oral agreement to rescind a written commercial lease agreement. In May 2011, the plaintiff company entered into a written lease, agreeing to rent a commercial building to the defendant company for a set term of three years and nine months. The lease provided for the first nine months of tenancy without rental payments, setting rental payments at $2,250.00 per month for the remainder of the initial term. At some time during the latter part of 2011, the two companies' respective presidents purportedly met and mutually agreed to terminate and rescind the lease. The presidents' agreement was never memorialized in writing, however, and the lease contained a provision that prevented any oral modification to the contract. Neither company thereafter acted in accordance with the lease until November 24, 2015, when the plaintiff's new president contacted the defendant in writing, demanding thirty-six months of unpaid rent in addition to a five-percent late fee pursuant to the lease, for a total of $85,050.00. The defendant did not tender any payment to the plaintiff as requested. On May 17, 2016, the plaintiff filed a complaint in the Knox County Chancery Court ("trial court"), alleging unpaid rent and requesting an award of rent payments, late fees, and reasonable attorney's fees. The defendant filed an answer, asserting, inter alia, that the lease was invalid as a result of the oral rescission by mutual agreement in 2011. Upon cross-motions for summary judgment, the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff, awarding a monetary judgment in the amount of $92,208.75, representing an $81,000.00 balance of unpaid rent, $4,050.00 in late fees, and $7,158.75 in reasonable attorney's fees and expenses. The defendant filed a motion to alter or amend judgment, which the trial court denied. The defendant has appealed. Having determined that the lease did not prohibit an oral rescission by mutual agreement, we reverse the grant of summary judgment to TTL. Having also determined that a genuine issue of material fact remains as to whether TTL's former president possessed the authority to orally rescind the lease, we affirm the denial of summary judgment to J&S and remand for evidentiary proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Tenn. R. App. P. 3 Appeal as of Right; Judgment of the Chancery Court Affirmed in Part, Reversed in Part; Case Remanded
CHARLES D. SUSANO, JR., J., not participating.
Kevin C. Stevens and Briton S. Collins, Knoxville, Tennessee, for the appellant, Jenkins & Stiles, LLC.
Lawrence P. Leibowitz and Brandon J. Tindell, Knoxville, Tennessee, for the appellee, Tennessee Traders Landing, LLC.
OPINIONOn May 10, 2011, the plaintiff, Tennessee Traders Landing, LLC ("TTL"), entered into a commercial lease agreement ("Lease") with the defendant, Jenkins & Stiles, LLC ("J&S"), for the occupation of unfinished office space and warehouse storage located on Byington Solway Road in Knoxville, Tennessee, for an initial period of three years and nine months. The parties acted through their respective presidents at the time, Christopher ("Chris") Gettelfinger, who was TTL's president, and Bart Jenkins, who was J&S's president.1 The Lease sets forth a "base rent" schedule of "free rent" for the first nine months following the Lease's execution and $2,250.00 due each month thereafter for three years, comprising a "Basic Initial Term" of three years and nine months. The Lease then sets forth renewal option periods at incrementally higher rental rates provided certain conditions are met. Under the Lease, the initial three-year term during which rent payments would have been due spanned February 10, 2012, through January 10, 2015.
The Lease also includes the following pertinent provisions:
Although the Lease makes no mention of its purpose or the parties' intent, Chris Gettelfinger and Mr. Jenkins stated in their respective affidavits, attached to J&S's motion for summary judgment, that the parties entered into the Lease in order to assist TTL with securing financing for its business operations. According to Chris Gettelfinger and Mr. Jenkins, TTL was ultimately unable to secure financing. The affiants further stated that Chris Gettelfinger met with Mr. Jenkins at some time near the end of 2011 and mutually agreed to "terminate and rescind" the Lease. TTL claims that it had no knowledge of this meeting and that Chris Gettelfinger did not have the authority as president when meeting with Mr. Jenkins to terminate and rescind the Lease. It is undisputed that J&S never took possession of the office space under the Lease and that neither party took any action...
Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI
Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting