Lender Alert
June2012
BuchalterNemerisafull‐servicebusinesslawfirmrepresentingnationalandglobalclientsineightprimaryareasofpractice:BankandFinance,Corporate,HealthCare,Insolvency&FinancialSolutions,Litigation,Labor
andEmployment,IntellectualProperty,RealEstateandTaxandEstatePlanning.ThefirmhasofficesinLosAngeles,OrangeCounty,SanFranciscoandScottsdale.Formoreinformation,visitwww.buchalter.com
Thisarticleispublishedasaservicetoourclientsandfriends.Thematerialcontainedhereisprovidedforinformationalpurposesonlyandisnotintendedtoconstituteadvertising,solicitationorlegaladvice.
ThinkAgainBeforeWalkingAwayfromSecondTrustDeedsinBankruptcy
JosephM.Welch,Esq.
Banksandcreditunionsroutinelywalkawayfromsecondtrust
deedswherethereisn'tenoughequitytocovertheoutstanding
loanbalanceplusinterest,arrears,costsofsaleandattorneys'
fees.Thisisespeciallytruewheretheborrowerfilesachapter
13bankruptcycase,whichallowscertainsecuredlienstobe
completelyavoided.1
Butthereisnoreasonforbanksorcreditunionstounknowingly
andprematurelywalkawayfromsecondtrustdeedsthatare
givenspecialprotectionsinbankruptcy.
Theproblemforborrowerswhofileachapter13bankruptcy
caseisthe"anti‐modificationprovision"ofBankruptcyCode
section1322(b)(2),whichprotectssecondtrustdeedholders
fromhavingtheirloansmodifiedifboth:
(1)thepropertysecuringthelienisthedebtor'sprincipal
residenceand
(2)thereisanyvalue,even$1,tosupportthelien.2
ExpectedProcedureinChapter13Cases
Inpractice,adebtormayfileachapter13caseandmovethe
courttoavoidhersecondtrustdeedon14to21days'notice.
Thesemotionsareusuallysupportedbyadeclarationofthe
debtorstatingsomeself‐servingbeliefthatherresidenceis
worthafewthousanddollarslessthantheamountowedonthe
firsttrustdeed(soastoavoidtheanti‐modificationprovision).
Prudentbanksandcreditunionswill
(1)quicklydeterminewhetherthereisanyequitytosupport
theirsecondtrustdeeds3and
(2)ifso,fileanoppositiontothedebtor'smotion(oftendue
within7to14daysofthenotice)andrequestanopportunityto
appraisetheproperty.
Bankruptcycourtstypicallyrespondtoobjectionsbycontinuing
thehearingondebtor'smotionandsettingan"evidentiary
hearing"toallowthepartiestofiledeclarationsofappraisers
(withfullappraisalreports)andrequestcross‐examinationof
theotherside'sappraiser.Theseevidentiaryhearingscanbe
costlyandextremelyriskytobothsides(andthejudgesoften
disdainhearingthem).Inessence,ifthebankruptcycourtfinds
anyequitytosupportthesecondtrustdeedthentheentireloan
ispreserved.Butifthecourtfindsnoequity,thentheentire
loanisavoided.Inessence,bankruptcylawcreatesanall‐or
nothingpropositionthatoftencan(andshould)beavoided.
StrikingDealstoGetAroundtheAll‐or‐NothingProposition
Withincreasedfrequency,informedbanksandcreditunions
makedealswithborrowerstoreducethecostandriskof
evidentiaryhearingsforbothsides.Forexample,ona$100,000
HomeEquityLineofCreditwitha10percentinterestrate,the
bankorcreditunionmayagreetopaymentsof$1,000/mo.Over
fiveyearsinfullsatisfactionofthenote,4netting$60,000onthe
loanandgivingthedebtorsubstantialdebtreliefthroughan
effectivelyinterest‐freeloanthatissatisfiedinfiveyears—
insteadof15‐30years—wheretotalpaymentsarelessthanhalf
ofwhatwouldotherwiseberequiredunderthepromissory
note.Banksandcreditunionsunderstandablypreferpayments
whilethedebtor(wholikelyfiledchapter13andamotionto
avoidthesecondtrustdeedinordertosaveherresidence)still
reallywantstheproperty.Strikingareasonabledealcanresult
inthequintessentialwin‐winsituationforbothsides.
OvercomingHurdlestoPreservetheDeal
Intheory,everyonebenefitsfromadealasoutlinedabove,
includingthebankruptcycourtfornothavingtodecideanall‐
or‐nothingproposition,othercreditors,whogenerallymustbe
paidmoreinchapter13thanachapter7liquidationcase,and
thechapter13trustee,whocontinuestogetcommissionson
planpaymentsover3‐5years.Inpractice,however,some
trusteesinsistthatwherepaymenttermsaremodified,
paymentstothebankorcredituniononsecondtrustdeeds
mustbemadethroughtheplan,withthechapter13trustee's
commission,often11percent,assessedthereon.
Althoughthebankruptcycode,5localbankruptcyrules6and
trusteeguidelines7intheCentralDistrictofCaliforniaallsuggest
directpaymentsintheseinstancesisproper,trustees(and
judges)maybereluctanttoallowthisout‐of‐the‐boxapproach.
Thisistruedespiterelevantappellatelawgivingbankruptcy
courtsconsiderablediscretioninallowingthesepracticaldeals
inchapter13plansandrequiringarticulatedstandards
wheneverdirectpaymentsarenotallowed.8
Evenintheseinstancesinwhichthetrusteeandcourtare
reluctanttoallowdirectpaymentsfromthedebtortothebank
orcreditunion,opposingcounselwilloftenagreetoeither
dismissthechapter13caseorconvertittooneunderchapter7.
Bydoingso,thedebtorkeepsherproperty(whichisusually
thereasonforfilingchapter13inthefirstplace)andthebank
orcredituniongetspaymentsinadealthatsubstantially