Case Law Thompson v. State

Thompson v. State

Document Cited Authorities (3) Cited in (1) Related

Sarah M. Prince, Middle Circuit Public Defender's Office, 124 North Main Street, Swainsboro, Georgia 30401, for Appellant.

Patricia B. Attaway Burton, Deputy Attorney General, Paula Khristian Smith, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Christopher M. Carr, Attorney General, Parisia Faith Sarfarazi, Assistant Attorney General, Department of Law, 40 Capitol Square, S.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30334, Kelly J. Weathers, A.D.A., John Alexander Fitzner, III, Chief A.D.A., Middle Judicial Circuit District Attorney's Office, P.O. Box 590, Swainsboro, Georgia 30401, for Appellee.

LaGrua, Justice.

Appellant Darcy Thompson was convicted of felony murder in connection with the shooting death of Tyrone Cochran. On appeal, Appellant's sole enumeration of error is that the trial court erred by denying his request to instruct the jury on the lesser offense of voluntary manslaughter.1 For the following reasons, we affirm Appellant's conviction.

1. The evidence presented at trial showed that in March 2017, Hikeara Clark had romantic feelings for two men – the victim, Tyrone Cochran, and Appellant. Clark met Cochran in September 2015, and after the two started dating, Clark and her four children moved into his house in Swainsboro. About nine months later, Clark and Cochran broke up, and Cochran moved out. In May 2016, Clark started dating Appellant, and she and her children moved into a house with him, also in Swainsboro. Clark soon became pregnant with Appellant's first child, a girl, who was born in early March 2017.

According to Clark, when she and Appellant started dating, Cochran became jealous and wanted her back. Clark testified that several verbal encounters occurred between the two men, and during these "run-ins," Cochran would sometimes threaten Appellant.2 However, no physical fights ever occurred. Appellant likewise testified that Cochran consistently provoked and harassed him over the ten-month period he was dating Clark, but Appellant always ran away from Cochran or simply "went the other way." Family members and friends also observed the tension between Cochran and Appellant because they both wanted to be with Clark.

According to Clark, on the morning of March 13, 2017, she and Appellant got into an argument, and Clark left their house with her children, including her newborn daughter, and went to Cochran's house. Later that morning, Appellant's sister went to Cochran's house and told Clark to go home because Appellant was planning to come to Cochran's house, presumably to bring Clark and her children back home.3 Cochran then rented a hotel room for Clark because he had to go to work and did not want to leave her alone at his house. Clark went to the hotel, but shortly after arriving, she called Appellant and asked him to come pick her up. Clark testified that she "just didn't feel right" and wanted to go home with Appellant. Appellant and Clark returned to Appellant's home.

The following day, March 14, Clark borrowed Appellant's phone while he was asleep and sent a text message to Cochran, which she immediately deleted from Appellant's phone. The text stated that she was still in love with Cochran, that her "heart [was] with" him, and that she wanted to come back home to him. However, Clark remained with Appellant that night.

Around 2:30 p.m. on March 15, Appellant left Clark at his house and drove to a nearby convenience store, KT's, to meet with Stacia Burke, a woman he knew from the neighborhood, about selling his cell phone to her. Burke and her cousin, Haley Henry, drove to KT's together to meet Appellant. After arriving, Henry entered the store, and Burke got into Appellant's silver Highlander SUV to examine his cell phone. While Burke was in Appellant's SUV, she saw a red car drive around the store a couple of times and then slow down by Appellant's SUV. Appellant's mood changed as soon as he saw the red car. Having decided not to buy the cell phone, Burke got out of Appellant's SUV and got back into Henry's car, which was parked next to Appellant.

Around the same time, Henry was exiting KT's, and a red car "zoomed around" her, circled a couple of times around KT's, and slowed down by Appellant's SUV. Henry then saw the red car follow Appellant's SUV out of KT's parking lot. Henry got back into her car, and after a couple minutes, Henry and Burke heard what sounded like fireworks. Henry and Burke left KT's and observed the red car stopped in the road.

That same afternoon, Kathleen Ricks went to KT's on her way to work to pick up some food. She had just returned to her car when she heard gunshots. She ducked, and when she looked up again, she saw a red car stopped in the middle of the road.

Milton Ricks, Kathleen's nephew, was also in the parking lot of KT's around this time and heard gunshots. He noticed two vehicles parked closely together in the roadway – one in front of the other. The first vehicle, the make and model of which Milton could not recall, was parked directly in front of a red Charger. Milton testified that after the shooting stopped, the first vehicle sped off, almost running off the road. Milton called 911, but was too shocked to speak coherently, so Kathleen took his phone and reported the shooting. Milton then walked over to the red car and looked inside the vehicle. The driver was still alive, shaking and trying to talk, but no sound was coming out of his mouth.

The police arrived and found a red Charger stopped in the roadway with numerous bullet holes in the front driver's side from the fender to the windshield. They observed Cochran in the driver's seat, with blood covering his chest, and noted what appeared to be bullet wounds in his shoulder, arm, and chest. Emergency personnel arrived and transported Cochran to the hospital, where he later died from his injuries. The police collected numerous shell casings from a .40-caliber handgun4 around and inside Cochran's vehicle. Officers also obtained copies of video recordings from surveillance cameras from two nearby businesses. The recordings showed a red Charger and a silver Highlander driving to KT's before 2:30 p.m. on March 15, and the same two cars leaving the area a few minutes later – with the red car following closely behind the silver SUV.

Within minutes of the shooting, Appellant returned home and told Clark that he had shot Cochran. When Clark asked why, Appellant said he "got tired of [Cochran] messing with him." Appellant changed clothes and left the house on foot.

At about 3:00 or 4:00 p.m. the same afternoon, an acquaintance of Appellant's, Cordell Sutton, was driving from Swainsboro to his job on Jekyll Island. On the way out of town, Sutton saw Appellant walking down the road. Appellant stopped Sutton and asked for a ride to Statesboro. Sutton agreed and dropped Appellant off at his cousin's house in Statesboro that evening. The next day, March 16, after receiving a tip about Appellant's whereabouts, the police located him at an apartment in Statesboro and arrested him without incident.

At trial, Appellant admitted shooting Cochran. Appellant testified that Cochran periodically followed Appellant and Clark when they were driving somewhere together, but on these previous occasions, Appellant would typically ignore Cochran and keep going. However, on the afternoon of March 15, Appellant testified that he was "in fear." Appellant stated that he did not see Cochran until Cochran's red Charger sped up behind Appellant's SUV as he...

2 cases
Document | Georgia Supreme Court – 2022
Cook v. State
"... ... At least 14 such footnotes in 2021 indicated a granted motion for out-of-time appeal. See Williams v. State , 312 Ga. 386, 386 n.1, 863 S.E.2d 44 (2021) ; Baker v. State , 312 Ga. 363, 363 n.1, 863 S.E.2d 55 (2021) ; Walker v. State , 312 Ga. 332, 332 n.1, 862 S.E.2d 542 (2021) ; Thompson v. State , 312 Ga. 254, 254 n.1, 862 S.E.2d 317 (2021) ; Walker v. State , 312 Ga. 232, 232 n.1, 862 S.E.2d 285 (2021) ; Williams v. State , 312 Ga. 195, 195 n.1, 862 S.E.2d 108 (2021) ; Sullivan v. State , 311 Ga. 835, 835 n.1, 860 S.E.2d 576 (2021) ; Holmes v. State , 311 Ga. 698, 698 ... "
Document | Georgia Supreme Court – 2022
Watkins v. State
"... ... the trier of fact, to find Watkins guilty of voluntary manslaughter instead of felony murder.Although Watkins testified that he continued to hold Alexus to protect himself, we have explained that "acting out of fear is not the same as acting in the heat of a sudden irresistible passion." Thompson v. State , 312 Ga. 254, 258 (2), 862 S.E.2d 317 (2021) (citation and punctuation omitted). See also Smith v. State , 296 Ga. 731, 737 (3), 770 S.E.2d 610 (2015) ("[N]either fear that someone is going to pull a gun nor fighting are the types of provocation which demand a voluntary manslaughter ... "

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
2 cases
Document | Georgia Supreme Court – 2022
Cook v. State
"... ... At least 14 such footnotes in 2021 indicated a granted motion for out-of-time appeal. See Williams v. State , 312 Ga. 386, 386 n.1, 863 S.E.2d 44 (2021) ; Baker v. State , 312 Ga. 363, 363 n.1, 863 S.E.2d 55 (2021) ; Walker v. State , 312 Ga. 332, 332 n.1, 862 S.E.2d 542 (2021) ; Thompson v. State , 312 Ga. 254, 254 n.1, 862 S.E.2d 317 (2021) ; Walker v. State , 312 Ga. 232, 232 n.1, 862 S.E.2d 285 (2021) ; Williams v. State , 312 Ga. 195, 195 n.1, 862 S.E.2d 108 (2021) ; Sullivan v. State , 311 Ga. 835, 835 n.1, 860 S.E.2d 576 (2021) ; Holmes v. State , 311 Ga. 698, 698 ... "
Document | Georgia Supreme Court – 2022
Watkins v. State
"... ... the trier of fact, to find Watkins guilty of voluntary manslaughter instead of felony murder.Although Watkins testified that he continued to hold Alexus to protect himself, we have explained that "acting out of fear is not the same as acting in the heat of a sudden irresistible passion." Thompson v. State , 312 Ga. 254, 258 (2), 862 S.E.2d 317 (2021) (citation and punctuation omitted). See also Smith v. State , 296 Ga. 731, 737 (3), 770 S.E.2d 610 (2015) ("[N]either fear that someone is going to pull a gun nor fighting are the types of provocation which demand a voluntary manslaughter ... "

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex