Case Law Timothy M.M. v. Doreen R.

Timothy M.M. v. Doreen R.

Document Cited Authorities (1) Cited in Related

MARK A. WOLBER, UTICA, FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.

MICHAEL G. PUTTER, ROME, FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

JOHN G. KOSLOSKY, UTICA, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD.

PRESENT: PERADOTTO, J.P., LINDLEY, CURRAN, BANNISTER, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Matter of Eric D. [Appeal No. 1], 162 A.D.2d 1051, 1051, 559 N.Y.S.2d 156 [4th Dept. 1990] ).

2 cases
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2020
Timothy M.M. v. Doreen R.
"..."
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2020
Onondaga Cnty. Dep't of Children & Family Servs. v. Maurice S. (In re Irelynn S.)
"..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
2 cases
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2020
Timothy M.M. v. Doreen R.
"..."
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2020
Onondaga Cnty. Dep't of Children & Family Servs. v. Maurice S. (In re Irelynn S.)
"..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex