Sign Up for Vincent AI
Torres v. State
Terry Goodwin Jones, for appellant.
Leslie Rutledge, Att'y Gen., by: Kent G. Holt, Ass't Att'y Gen., for appellee.
Roberto Torres appeals the sentencing order entered by the Crawford County Circuit Court revoking his probation and sentencing him to six years' imprisonment for breaking or entering and six years' imprisonment for theft of property, to run consecutively. On appeal, Torres argues that insufficient evidence supports the circuit court's revocation decision. We agree and reverse and dismiss.
On August 30, 2012, Torres pled guilty to breaking or entering and theft of property. He was sentenced on September 17, 2012, to five years' probation and ordered to pay restitution, court costs, fines, probation-supervision fees, and administrative fees. The conditions of probation attached to the sentencing order required him, among other things, to pay his financial obligations, report to his probation officer, report address changes, and not commit a criminal offense punishable by imprisonment.
The State filed a petition for revocation on October 26, 2012, alleging that Torres had failed to make payments toward his financial obligations. On January 11, 2013, the circuit court entered an order finding that Torres pled guilty to contempt of this condition of his probation. Torres was sentenced to twenty days in jail suspended upon the condition that he pay a $500 fine in full prior to January 1, 2013. This order further states, "All terms and conditions of probation remain as previously ordered."
On May 28, 2014, the State filed a petition to revoke Torres's probation, alleging that he had failed to pay his probation fines and fees. The circuit court entered an order on September 23 finding that Torres pled guilty to the allegation, and Torres was sentenced to serve fifteen days in jail. This order also states, "All previously ordered terms and conditions remain as previously stated."
The State filed another petition to revoke Torres's probation on October 13, 2016, alleging that he had failed a drug test on August 17, 2016; had failed to provide a valid address to his probation officer; had failed to pay his fees; and had absconded. The circuit court entered a sentencing order on July 31, 2017, revoking Torres's probation and sentencing him to three years' probation. No conditions of probation are attached to this sentencing order; however, the "Additional Info" section of the order states: Thus, the only condition of probation referenced in this order is the monthly probation fee.
On December 18, 2017, the State filed a petition to revoke Torres's probation alleging that he had failed to pay probation fees, failed drug testing, and "failed to report for probation by absconding." The State amended the petition on May 10, 2018, to add that Torres had failed to report to his probation officer and failed to get approval from his supervising officer to change his address. On August 23, the State moved to withdraw the amended petition to revoke, and the circuit court entered an order granting the motion on August 27.
The State filed another petition to revoke Torres's probation on December 5, 2018, alleging that he had failed to report to his probation officer on November 8; committed the new offense of possession of drug paraphernalia on November 9; failed to provide proof of his residence on November 27; and failed to pay probation fees and absconded on December 5. The State amended the petition on March 5, 2019, adding the allegation that Torres had failed to appear for his January 2019 revocation hearing. On May 7, 2019, the State filed a second amended petition to revoke adding the allegation that Torres had failed to appear for a revocation hearing in March 2019.
A revocation hearing was held on May 17, 2019, at which Torres's probation officer, Michael Irby, testified that Torres was scheduled to report on November 8 but did not report on that date or thereafter. Irby testified that he received an email that Torres had been arrested on a new charge on November 9 but offered no other details. Irby stated that on November 27, he made a home visit to the address Torres had provided, but Torres was not home, and there was no evidence that he had been living there. Finally, Irby said that Torres had not paid his probation-supervision fees and owed $180. Tabitha Medford, deputy clerk for the Crawford County Circuit Court, testified that court records indicate that two failure-to-appear warrants were issued for Torres after he failed to appear in court in January and March 2019.
Torres testified that he completed a drug-treatment program last year as part of his probation and that he had been sober for eight months, but around November 5, 2018, he had "gotten high again" and needs drug treatment. Torres conceded that he failed to appear for his January 2019 revocation hearing and that he showed up late for his March 2019 revocation hearing.
At the conclusion of the hearing, the circuit court orally revoked Torres's probation. The court found that one of Torres's conditions of probation was not to violate any other laws, yet he failed to appear in court on at least one occasion. A sentencing order was entered on June 10, 2019, revoking Torres's...
Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI
Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting