Case Law U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. Shereshevsky

U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. Shereshevsky

Document Cited Authorities (3) Cited in (8) Related

Solomon Rosengarten, Brooklyn, NY, for appellants.

Friedman Vartolo LLP, Garden City, NY (Oran Schwager of counsel), for respondent.

MARK C. DILLON, J.P., ANGELA G. IANNACCI, LINDA CHRISTOPHER, PAUL WOOTEN, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendants Elka Shereshevsky, Chana Shereshevsky, and Shabsi Pfeiffer appeal from a judgment of foreclosure and sale of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lawrence Knipel, J.), dated March 19, 2018. The judgment of foreclosure and sale, upon a decision of the same court dated September 12, 2017, made after a nonjury trial, directed the sale of the subject property.

ORDERED that the judgment of foreclosure and sale is affirmed, with costs.

On October 31, 2006, the defendant Elka Shereshevsky executed a note in favor of Bank of America, N.A. On the same date, to secure the note, Elka and the defendant Chana Shereshevsky executed a mortgage encumbering property located in Brooklyn. The note and mortgage were subsequently assigned to the plaintiff. In September 2014, Elka conveyed her interest in the property to the defendant Shabsi Pfeiffer and nonparty Gerard Crockett. Elka and Chana defaulted on the terms of the note and mortgage, and in December 2014, the plaintiff commenced this action to foreclose the mortgage. After a nonjury trial, the Supreme Court issued a decision in favor of the plaintiff and, thereafter, a judgment of foreclosure and sale. Elka, Chana, and Pfeiffer (hereinafter collectively the defendants) appeal.

RPAPL 1304(1) provides that, "with regard to a home loan, at least ninety days before a lender, an assignee or a mortgage loan servicer commences legal action against the borrower, ... including mortgage foreclosure, such lender, assignee or mortgage loan servicer shall give notice to the borrower." "Home loan" is defined as a loan, inter alia, that is secured by a mortgage on real estate "which is or will be occupied by the borrower as the borrower's principal dwelling" ( RPAPL 1304[6][a][1][iii] ; see L 2009, ch 507, § 1–a [eff Jan. 14, 2010]). At trial, the plaintiff introduced into evidence a "SECOND HOME RIDER" that Elka and Chana executed as an addendum to the mortgage encumbering the property, which provided that they would occupy and use the...

5 cases
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2023
U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. Reddy
"...( id. § 1304[6][a][1][iii] ; see MLB Sub I, LLC v. Mathew, 202 A.D.3d 1078, 1080, 159 N.Y.S.3d 867 ; U.S. Bank N.A. v. Shereshevsky, 198 A.D.3d 1000, 1001, 155 N.Y.S.3d 588 ). Contrary to its contention, the plaintiff failed to establish, prima facie, that the subject loan was not a "home l..."
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2021
U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. Jean-Charles
"..."
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2022
U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. Thomas
"...1179–1180, 154 N.Y.S.3d 73 ; cf. MLB Sub I, LLC v. Mathew, 202 A.D.3d 1078, 1079–1080, 159 N.Y.S.3d 867 ; U.S. Bank N.A. v. Shereshevsky, 198 A.D.3d 1000, 1001, 155 N.Y.S.3d 588 ). However, the Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was to strike the defe..."
Document | New York Supreme Court – 2022
Bank of Am. v. Sands
"...v Shereshevsky, 198 A.D.3d 1000, 1001 [2d Dept 2021]; see also MLB Sub I, LLC v Mathew, 202 A.D.3d 1078, 1081 [2d Dept 2022]). However, in Shereshevsky Mathew the mortgagors failed to proffer any evidence that upon executing the rider they "thereafter used the property as their principal dw..."
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2022
Wells Fargo Bank, Nat'l Ass'n v. Rodriguez
"...( id. § 1304[6][a][1][iii] ; see MLB Sub I, LLC v. Mathew, 202 A.D.3d 1078, 1079–1080, 159 N.Y.S.3d 867 ; U.S. Bank N.A. v. Shereshevsky, 198 A.D.3d 1000, 1001, 155 N.Y.S.3d 588 ). Here, the plaintiff failed to establish, prima facie, its strict compliance with RPAPL 1304. The affidavit sub..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2023
U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. Reddy
"...( id. § 1304[6][a][1][iii] ; see MLB Sub I, LLC v. Mathew, 202 A.D.3d 1078, 1080, 159 N.Y.S.3d 867 ; U.S. Bank N.A. v. Shereshevsky, 198 A.D.3d 1000, 1001, 155 N.Y.S.3d 588 ). Contrary to its contention, the plaintiff failed to establish, prima facie, that the subject loan was not a "home l..."
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2021
U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. Jean-Charles
"..."
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2022
U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. Thomas
"...1179–1180, 154 N.Y.S.3d 73 ; cf. MLB Sub I, LLC v. Mathew, 202 A.D.3d 1078, 1079–1080, 159 N.Y.S.3d 867 ; U.S. Bank N.A. v. Shereshevsky, 198 A.D.3d 1000, 1001, 155 N.Y.S.3d 588 ). However, the Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was to strike the defe..."
Document | New York Supreme Court – 2022
Bank of Am. v. Sands
"...v Shereshevsky, 198 A.D.3d 1000, 1001 [2d Dept 2021]; see also MLB Sub I, LLC v Mathew, 202 A.D.3d 1078, 1081 [2d Dept 2022]). However, in Shereshevsky Mathew the mortgagors failed to proffer any evidence that upon executing the rider they "thereafter used the property as their principal dw..."
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2022
Wells Fargo Bank, Nat'l Ass'n v. Rodriguez
"...( id. § 1304[6][a][1][iii] ; see MLB Sub I, LLC v. Mathew, 202 A.D.3d 1078, 1079–1080, 159 N.Y.S.3d 867 ; U.S. Bank N.A. v. Shereshevsky, 198 A.D.3d 1000, 1001, 155 N.Y.S.3d 588 ). Here, the plaintiff failed to establish, prima facie, its strict compliance with RPAPL 1304. The affidavit sub..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex