Sign Up for Vincent AI
U.S. Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Apostelos
This case is before the Court on the Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 52) (the "Motion") filed by Plaintiff United States Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56. Specifically, the SEC moves for summary judgment as to Counts I, II, V, VI, VII, VIII, and IX asserted against Defendant William M. Apostelos ("Apostelos") in the Complaint (Doc. 1). The SEC's overarching argument is that it is entitled to summary judgment based on the preclusive effect of the judgment entered by this Court against Apostelos in a parallel criminal case, United States v. Apostelos, No. 3:15-cr-00148 (S.D. Ohio) (the "Criminal Action") and undisputed evidence of Apostelos' fraud. Apostelos, who is a currently incarcerated pro se defendant, filed a memorandum in opposition to the Motion (Doc. 61) (the "Opposition"), and the SEC filed a reply memorandum in support of the Motion (Doc. 62) (the "Reply"). The Motion is fully briefed and ripe for review. (Docs. 52, 61, 62.) For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS the Motion, IMPOSES RELIEF as set forth below, and TERMINATES this case.
On October 29, 2015, the SEC filed its Complaint in this civil action against Defendants Apostelos, WMA Enterprises, LLC ("WMA"), Midwest Green Resources, LLC ("Midwest Green"), and OVO Wealth Management, LLC ("OVO") (collectively, "Defendants"), and against Relief Defendants Connie Apostelos ("Connie"), Apostelos Enterprises, Inc. ("Apostelos Enterprises"), Coleman Capital, Inc. ("Coleman Capital"), and Silver Bridle Racing, LLC ("Silver Bridle") (collectively, "Relief Defendants"). (Doc. 1.)
In the Complaint, the SEC alleges that Apostelos violated various securities laws by operating a fraudulent scheme that involved, among other things, making numerous false and misleading statements to hundreds of investors, as well as selling unregistered securities and acting as an unregistered broker. The specific claims brought against Apostelos are the following:
(Doc. 1.)
On October 29, 2015 (the same day that the SEC filed the Complaint), the United States Attorney for the Southern District of Ohio filed an indictment against Apostelos. (Criminal Action Doc. 6.) The indictment alleges, among other things, that Apostelos "knowingly and intentionally conspired to devise, execute, and participate in a scheme to defraud investors and to obtain money and property owned by and under the custody and control of investors, by means of materially false and fraudulent pretenses, representations, and promises, and the non-disclosure and concealment of material facts ...." (Id. at PAGEID # 42.) The criminal indictment is predicated on much of the same conduct that forms the basis of the SEC's Complaint in this civil case. (Compare Criminal Action Doc. 6 to Doc. 1.)
On December 15, 2016, Apostelos signed a Plea Agreement,1 pursuant to which he pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit wire and mail fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1349 (Criminal Action Count One) and one count of conversion of funds from an employee benefits plan in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 664 (Criminal Action Count Twenty-Four). (Criminal Action Doc. 58.) Exhibit A to the Plea Agreement is a "Statement of Facts for Williams Apostelos," which Apostelos signed as being "AGREED AND ACCEPTED" and which states the following:
(Id. at PAGEID # 281-82.)
This Court accepted Apostelos' guilty plea on February 10, 2017. (Criminal Action Doc. 59.) On June 30, 2017, this Court sentenced him to 180 months in prison and ordered him to pay restitution in the amount of $32,767,578.72 and forfeit assets traceable to the offenses for which he was convicted. (Criminal Action Doc. 81.)
Attached as an exhibit to the SEC's Motion is a Declaration of Luz M. Aguilar ("Aguilar Decl."). (Doc. 52-2.) Mr. Aguilar is a Senior Accountant with the SEC who participated in the SEC's investigation regarding the offer and sale of investments by Apostelos and his entities (WMA, Midwest Green, and OVO). (Id.) Among other things, Mr. Aguilar reviewed numerous documents and analyzed records that show the flow of funds through accounts held by Apostelos and his entities at various financial institutions. (See Doc. 52-2, 52-3.)
In his Declaration, Mr. Aguilar states that, based on his review and analysis, (Doc. 52-2 at PAGEID # 351.) Mr. Aguilar states that "[f]rom at least November 2010 through at least October 2014, Apostelos used accounts he controlled to deposit approximately $60.4 million from investors. From at least November 2010 through at least November 2014, investors received approximately $49.2 million from accounts controlled by Apostelos which held investor funds. Apostelos used his entities to raise a net amount from investors of approximately $11.2 million ($60.4 million raised from investors less $49.2 million paid to investors). (Id. at PAGEID # 351-52.) Mr. Aguilar calculated prejudgment interest on the approximately $11.2 million net amount Apostelos raised from investors to be $587,371.04. (Id. at...
Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI
Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting