Case Law U.S. v. Myers

U.S. v. Myers

Document Cited Authorities (6) Cited in (4) Related

Ann Marie C. Villafana, West Palm Beach, FL, Anne R. Schultz, Asst. U.S. Atty., Kathleen M. Salyer, Emily M. Smachetti, Miami, FL, for U.S.

Janice Bergmann, Fed. Pub. Def., Nelson Marks, Asst. Fed. Pub. Def., Ft. Lauderdale, FL, Kathleen M. Williams, Fed. Pub. Def., Miami, FL, for Myers.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (No. 08-60064-CR-WJZ); William J. Zloch, Judge.

Before BIRCH, BLACK and HULL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The Government appeals the district court's order dismissing an indictment that charged Edward Myers with traveling in interstate commerce and failing to register as sex offender as required by the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA), in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2250(a). The district court concluded that both § 2250 and SORNA's sex-offender registration requirements found in 42 U.S.C. § 16913 exceeded Congress's authority under the Commerce Clause. United States v. Myers, 591 F.Supp.2d 1312, 1316 (S.D.Fla.2008).

We recently upheld against a Commerce Clause challenge both the failure-to-register offense in 18 U.S.C. § 2250(a) and the registration requirements in 42 U.S.C. § 16913. See United States v. Ambert, 561 F.3d 1202, 1210-12 (11th Cir.2009). Myers concedes that the district court's order dismissing the indictment is contrary to Ambert but challenges the reasoning of that panel's decision on appeal. We are bound by that decision unless overruled by the Supreme Court or this Court sitting en banc. See United States v. Vega-Castillo, 540 F.3d 1235, 1236 (11th Cir.2008).1 Accordingly, we vacate the district court's order and remand for reinstatement of the indictment. See United States v. Powers, 562 F.3d 1342, 1344 (11th Cir.2009).

VACATED AND REMANDED.

1. We have denied Myers' petition for an initial hearing en banc.

2 cases
Document | U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit – 2009
U.S. v. Brown
"...are bound by [Ambert] unless overruled by the Supreme Court or this Court sitting en banc." United States v. Myers, 584 F.3d 1349 No. 09-10228, 2009 WL 3270005, at *1 (11th Cir. Oct. 13, 2009). Accordingly, Ambert III. CONCLUSION In summary, we find that the district court did not commit pl..."
Document | U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit – 2009
In re Paige
"... ... disgorgement of payments made to third-party creditors, and that such disgorgement is outside the court's authority, that would still not convince us that this appeal was constitutionally moot. SMDI has not ... 584 F.3d 1337 ... only asked this court to confirm their plan, but also to deny ... "

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
2 cases
Document | U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit – 2009
U.S. v. Brown
"...are bound by [Ambert] unless overruled by the Supreme Court or this Court sitting en banc." United States v. Myers, 584 F.3d 1349 No. 09-10228, 2009 WL 3270005, at *1 (11th Cir. Oct. 13, 2009). Accordingly, Ambert III. CONCLUSION In summary, we find that the district court did not commit pl..."
Document | U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit – 2009
In re Paige
"... ... disgorgement of payments made to third-party creditors, and that such disgorgement is outside the court's authority, that would still not convince us that this appeal was constitutionally moot. SMDI has not ... 584 F.3d 1337 ... only asked this court to confirm their plan, but also to deny ... "

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex