Case Law U.S. v. State of Washington

U.S. v. State of Washington

Document Cited Authorities (47) Cited in (27) Related

Beezer, Circuit Judge, concurred and filed opinion.

Phillip E. Katzen (Argued), and Allen H. Sanders, Columbia Legal Services, Seattle, Washington, for plaintiff-appellee cross-appellant Jamestown, Lower Elwha and Port Gamble Bands of S'Klallams, Nisqually, Nooksack, Sauk-Suiattle, Skokomish, Squaxin Island, Stillaguamish and Upper Skagit Tribes, Indian Tribes.

Evelyn S. Ying (Argued), Ann C. Juliano, Martin W. Matzen, Peter C. Monson, Attorneys, United States Department of Justice, Environment & Natural Resources Division, Washington, DC, for appellee/cross-appellant United States.

Jay D. Geck (Argued), Fronda Woods, and Robert C. Hargreaves, Assistant Attorneys General, John W. Hough, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Attorney General's Office, State of Washington, Olympia, Washington, for defendants-appellants cross-appellees.

James M. Johnson (Argued), Olympia, Washington, for intervenor defendant-appellant, 26 Tideland and Upland Private Property Owners ("UPOW").

Howard M. Goodfriend (Argued), and Malcolm L. Edwards, Edwards, Sieh, Hathaway, Smith & Goodfriend, Seattle, Washington, for Private Owners.

Michael Himes (Argued), and Albert Gidari, Jr., Perkins Coie, Seattle, Washington, for intervenors defendants-appellants, Puget Sound Shellfish Growers.

Eric Richter, Skeel Henke, Evenson & Roberts, Seattle, Washington, for intervenor defendant-appellant Adkins, et. al.

Mason D. Morisset, Seattle, Washington, for Tulalip Tribes.

Riyaz A. Kanji, Williams and Connolly, Washington, DC, for plaintiffs-appellees cross-appellants Jamestown, Lower Elwha and Port Gamble Bands of S'Klallams, Nisqually, Nooksack, Sauk-Suiattle, Skokomish, Squaxin Island, Stillaguamish and Upper Skagit Tribes, Indian Tribes.

John Sledd, and Mary Linda Pearson, Suquamish, Washington, for Suquamish Tribe.

Daniel A. Raas and Harry L. Johnsen, Bellingham, Washington, for Lummi Tribe.

Richard Berley, John Arum, Mark Slonim, Seattle, Washington, for Makah Tribe.

Bill Tobin and Christina Berg, Seattle, Washington, for Nisqually Tribe.

Annette M. Klapstein, John Howard Bell, and Debra S. O'Gara, Tacoma, Washington, for Puyallup Tribe.

Kevin R. Lyon and Ronald Whitener, Olympia, Washington, for Squaxin Island Tribe.

Robert L. Otsea, Seattle, Washington, for Muckleshoot Tribe.

Kathryn Nelson and Amy C. Lewis, Tacoma, Washington, co-counsel for Port Gamble, Lower Elwha and Jamestown Bands of S'Klallams and Skokomish Tribe.

Leslie Barnhart, Port Angeles, Washington, Lori Salzarulo and Ruth Kennedy, Seattle, Washington, for Quileute Tribe.

Nettie Alvarez and Richard Ralston, Seattle, Washington, for Hoh Tribe.

Jeffrey Jon Bode, Bellingham, Washington, co-counsel for Nooksack Tribe.

Edward G. Maloney, Sedro Woolley, Washington, co-counsel for Skagit Tribe.

Harold Chesnin, Seattle, Washington, co-counsel for Upper Skagit Tribe.

Allan E. Olson, La Conner, Washington, for Swinomish Indian Community.

Daniel W. Wyckoff, Olympia, Washington, Tom D. Tobin, Winner, South Dakota, for amicus curiae Inner Sound Crab Association and Washington Dungeness Crab Fishermen's Association.

Stephanie L. Striffler, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, Oregon, for amicus curiae State of Oregon.

Nancie Marzulla, Washington, DC, for amicus curiae Defenders of Property Rights.

Robin Rivett, Sacramento, California, John M. Groen, Bellvue, Washington, amicus curiae Pacific Legal Foundation.

Toby Thaler, Seattle, Washington, for amicus curiae Washington Environmental Council.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington; Edward Rafeedie, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-89-00003-ER.

Before: LAY, * BEEZER and TROTT, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge TROTT; Concurrence by Judge BEEZER.

TROTT, Circuit Judge:

I. OVERVIEW

The State of Washington, groups of private tideland property owners ("Private Owners"), and commercial shellfish growers ("Growers") (collectively, "Appellants") appeal the district court's judgment following two bench trials in an action brought by numerous Indian Tribes 1 (the "Tribes") and the United States (on the Tribes' behalf) seeking a declaration of rights to shellfish under the Stevens Treaties ("Treaties"). The United States and the Tribes cross-appeal the district court's order implementing the Tribes' rights.

In 1855, the United States negotiated five Treaties with the Tribes in the Western Washington Territory. The Tribes ceded their aboriginal lands to the United States for settlement, receiving in exchange exclusive title to defined lands, free medical care, schools, occupational training, and annuity payments. The Treaties also reserved to the Tribes the "right of taking fish, at all usual and accustomed grounds and stations ... in common with all citizens of the Territory...." In a series of decisions beginning in 1974, federal courts, including the Ninth Circuit and the Supreme Court, held that this treaty language entitles the Tribes to take fifty percent of the salmon and other free-swimming fish in the waters controlled by Washington State. The Tribes' rights to shellfish under the Treaties, however, are limited by the...

5 cases
Document | U.S. District Court — Western District of New York – 2002
Seneca Nation of Indians v. New York
"... ... United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor, ... The State of NEW YORK; George E. Pataki, Governor, State of New York; Bernadette Castro, Commissioner, Parks, ... Page 451 ...         Samuel C. Alexandra, Indian Resources Section, Washington, DC, Alexandra C. Page, Indian Resource Center, Washington, DC, Arlinda Locklear, Jefferson, MD, ...         Meetings amongst ourselves and with you and from all that you have said to us thereon, we have at length come to a final resolution concerning it, and we hope that what is now ... "
Document | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit – 1998
U.S. v. State of Wash.
"...Suggestion For Rehearing En Banc And Amended Opinion ORDER The Opinion filed January 28, 1998, slip op. 783, and appearing at 135 F.3d 618 (9th Cir.1998), is amended as 1. At slip op. 829, last sentence of the first full paragraph; 135 F.3d at 640, first full sentence on the page beginning ..."
Document | Washington Supreme Court – 2020
Robbins v. Mason Cnty. Title Ins. Co.
"...to include shellfish. United States v. Washington , 873 F. Supp. 1422, 1430 (W.D. Wash. 1994), aff'd in part, reversed in part, 135 F.3d 618 (9th Cir. 1998). The Ninth Circuit agreed that this right to take fish includes the right to harvest shellfish from private lands within the usual and..."
Document | U.S. District Court — District of New Jersey – 1999
Iwanowa v. Ford Motor Co.
"...(holding that "a treaty should not be interpreted so as to render one part inoperative"), rev'd in part on other grounds, 135 F.3d 618 (9th Cir. 1998); see also Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 203(a) (1981) (stating that "an interpretation which gives a reasonable, lawful and effective ..."
Document | U.S. District Court — Western District of Washington – 2003
United States v. Washington
"... 19 F.Supp.3d 1317 UNITED STATES of America, et al., Plaintiffs v. State of WASHINGTON, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 9213. United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle. (January 1, 2000 through December 31, ... "

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial
5 books and journal articles
Document | Table of Cases
Table of Cases
"...474 U.S. 994 (1985): 5.9, 8.4(4)(c) United States v. Washington, 873 F. Supp. 1422 (W.D. Wash. 1994), aff'd in part, rev'd in part, 135 F.3d 618 (9th Cir.), and amended, 157 F.3d 630 (9th Cir. 1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1060 (1999): 4.25, 5.16 United States v. Washington, Cause No. 9213,..."
Document | Table of Cases
Table of Cases
"...Wash. 1994), supplemental ruling at 898 F. Supp. 1453, 1472-73, and amended by 909 F. Supp. 787 (1995), aff'd in part, rev'd in part, 135 F.3d 618, and replacement opinion at 157 F.3d 630 (9th Cir. 1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1060: 12.2(5)(a)(iv), 12.2(5)(d)(viii) Wellesley Hills Realty T..."
Document | Chapter 12 State- Owned Public Lands
§ 12.2 - Lands Managed by the Department of Natural Resources
"...tribal access to privately owned tidelands for harvest shellfish), and amended at 909 F.SUPP. 787 (1995), aff'd in part, rev'd in part, 135 F.3d 618, and replacement opinion at 157 F.3d 630 (9th Cir. 1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. (v) Riparian rights and state-owned aquatic lands Under the c..."
Document | Vol. 32 Núm. 3, June 2002 – 2002
Case summaries.
"...Cir. 2002) (listing the individual Stevens Treaties by name and the tribes that were party to each). (286) United States v. Washington 135 F.3d 618 (9th Cir. 1998), amended and superceded by 157 F.3d 630, 639 (9th Cir. (287) 16 U.S.C. [subsection] 1801-1883 (2000). (288) H.R. REP. No. 94-44..."
Document | Vol. 29 Núm. 3, September 1999 – 1999
United States v. Washington: the Boldt decision reincarnated.
"...1453, 1457 (W.D. Wash. 1995) (Shellfish II), amended, 909 F. Supp. 787 (W.D. Wash. 1998) (Shellfish III), aff'd in part, rev'd in part, 135 F.3d 618 (9th Cir.), amended and superseded on denial of reh'g, 157 F.3d 630 (9th Cir. 1998), cert. denied, 119 S. Ct. 1376 (5) Shellfish I, 873 F. Sup..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 books and journal articles
Document | Table of Cases
Table of Cases
"...474 U.S. 994 (1985): 5.9, 8.4(4)(c) United States v. Washington, 873 F. Supp. 1422 (W.D. Wash. 1994), aff'd in part, rev'd in part, 135 F.3d 618 (9th Cir.), and amended, 157 F.3d 630 (9th Cir. 1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1060 (1999): 4.25, 5.16 United States v. Washington, Cause No. 9213,..."
Document | Table of Cases
Table of Cases
"...Wash. 1994), supplemental ruling at 898 F. Supp. 1453, 1472-73, and amended by 909 F. Supp. 787 (1995), aff'd in part, rev'd in part, 135 F.3d 618, and replacement opinion at 157 F.3d 630 (9th Cir. 1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1060: 12.2(5)(a)(iv), 12.2(5)(d)(viii) Wellesley Hills Realty T..."
Document | Chapter 12 State- Owned Public Lands
§ 12.2 - Lands Managed by the Department of Natural Resources
"...tribal access to privately owned tidelands for harvest shellfish), and amended at 909 F.SUPP. 787 (1995), aff'd in part, rev'd in part, 135 F.3d 618, and replacement opinion at 157 F.3d 630 (9th Cir. 1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. (v) Riparian rights and state-owned aquatic lands Under the c..."
Document | Vol. 32 Núm. 3, June 2002 – 2002
Case summaries.
"...Cir. 2002) (listing the individual Stevens Treaties by name and the tribes that were party to each). (286) United States v. Washington 135 F.3d 618 (9th Cir. 1998), amended and superceded by 157 F.3d 630, 639 (9th Cir. (287) 16 U.S.C. [subsection] 1801-1883 (2000). (288) H.R. REP. No. 94-44..."
Document | Vol. 29 Núm. 3, September 1999 – 1999
United States v. Washington: the Boldt decision reincarnated.
"...1453, 1457 (W.D. Wash. 1995) (Shellfish II), amended, 909 F. Supp. 787 (W.D. Wash. 1998) (Shellfish III), aff'd in part, rev'd in part, 135 F.3d 618 (9th Cir.), amended and superseded on denial of reh'g, 157 F.3d 630 (9th Cir. 1998), cert. denied, 119 S. Ct. 1376 (5) Shellfish I, 873 F. Sup..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
Document | U.S. District Court — Western District of New York – 2002
Seneca Nation of Indians v. New York
"... ... United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor, ... The State of NEW YORK; George E. Pataki, Governor, State of New York; Bernadette Castro, Commissioner, Parks, ... Page 451 ...         Samuel C. Alexandra, Indian Resources Section, Washington, DC, Alexandra C. Page, Indian Resource Center, Washington, DC, Arlinda Locklear, Jefferson, MD, ...         Meetings amongst ourselves and with you and from all that you have said to us thereon, we have at length come to a final resolution concerning it, and we hope that what is now ... "
Document | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit – 1998
U.S. v. State of Wash.
"...Suggestion For Rehearing En Banc And Amended Opinion ORDER The Opinion filed January 28, 1998, slip op. 783, and appearing at 135 F.3d 618 (9th Cir.1998), is amended as 1. At slip op. 829, last sentence of the first full paragraph; 135 F.3d at 640, first full sentence on the page beginning ..."
Document | Washington Supreme Court – 2020
Robbins v. Mason Cnty. Title Ins. Co.
"...to include shellfish. United States v. Washington , 873 F. Supp. 1422, 1430 (W.D. Wash. 1994), aff'd in part, reversed in part, 135 F.3d 618 (9th Cir. 1998). The Ninth Circuit agreed that this right to take fish includes the right to harvest shellfish from private lands within the usual and..."
Document | U.S. District Court — District of New Jersey – 1999
Iwanowa v. Ford Motor Co.
"...(holding that "a treaty should not be interpreted so as to render one part inoperative"), rev'd in part on other grounds, 135 F.3d 618 (9th Cir. 1998); see also Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 203(a) (1981) (stating that "an interpretation which gives a reasonable, lawful and effective ..."
Document | U.S. District Court — Western District of Washington – 2003
United States v. Washington
"... 19 F.Supp.3d 1317 UNITED STATES of America, et al., Plaintiffs v. State of WASHINGTON, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 9213. United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle. (January 1, 2000 through December 31, ... "

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex