Sign Up for Vincent AI
United States v. Amri
Defendants Soufian Amri ("Amri") and Michael Queen ("Queen") (collectively, "defendants") came before the Court for a criminal bench trial on a partially stipulated record, having executed a knowing and voluntary waiver of their right to a trial by jury. [Dkt. 53]. Although the defendants have stipulated to the factual record, which is quoted verbatim in this opinion, they reserved the right to raise numerous objections and to argue whether the stipulated facts were sufficient to support conviction. For the reasons that follow, all but one of the defendant's evidentiary objections will be denied, Amri will be found guilty of the charges in Counts 1, 2, and 4, Queen will be found guilty of the charges in Counts 1 and 5, both defendants will be acquitted of the charge in Count 3, and the sentencing enhancement element in Counts 4 and 5 will be applied because the government has proven it beyond a reasonable doubt.
Count 1 charges that from June 24, 2016 until July 8, 2016, in Fairfax County, the defendants unlawfully and knowingly conspired (1) to corruptly persuade, and engage in misleading conduct toward, another person with the intent to hinder, delay, and prevent the communication to a law enforcement officer of the United States; and (2) to willfully conceal a material fact, and to make a materially false statement in a matter involving international terrorism, all in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. [Dkt. 31] at 1-2. In furtherance of the conspiracy, the indictment alleges that at least seven overt acts were committed, including that: (1) Amri told Queen that the Federal Bureau of Investigation ("FBI") was asking questions about whether they knew anyone who supported ISIS, or attempted to travel overseas to join ISIS; (2) Amri told Queen not to mention Haris Qamar ("Qamar"), a mutual friend of theirs; and (3) Amri and Queen both falsely told the FBI that the only person they knew who might support ISIS was a "tall, thin, Indian" man. Id. at 2-3.
Count 2 charges that on June 24, 2016, Amri knowingly and unlawfully attempted to corruptly persuade Queen to prevent the communication to a law enforcement officer of information relating to the possible commission of a federal offense by attempting to persuade Queen to refrain from disclosing to the FBI Qamar's support for ISIS and attempted overseas travel, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1512(b). Id. at 4.
Count 3 charges that on June 24, 2016, both defendants knowingly and unlawfully engaged in misleading conduct toward another person with the intent to prevent the communication to a law enforcement officer of the United States of information relating to the possible commission of a federal offense by telling the FBI that the only person they knew who might support ISIS was a "tall, thin, Indian" man when in fact they knew that Qamar had expressed support for ISIS and attempted to travel overseas to join ISIS, all in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1512(b). Id. at 5.
Counts 4 and 5 respectively charge Amri and Queen with knowingly and willfully making material false statements to the FBI by telling agents that the only person they knew who might support ISIS was a "tall, thin, Indian" man for the purpose of concealing Qamar's support for ISIS, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001(a). These counts further allege that these offenses "involved international terrorism" within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 2331.
The parties have stipulated, and the Court finds, that the following facts are true and that the government could have proven them beyond a reasonable doubt at trial1:
Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI
Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting