Sign Up for Vincent AI
United States v. Assorted Jewelry Approximately Value of $44,328.00
Pending before the court is the United States of America's Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 44) and claimant Angel A. Betancourt-Pérez's ("Claimant" or "Betancourt-Pérez") unsupported Opposition.1 (Docket No. 46). For the reasons discussed herein, the government's unopposed request is GRANTED.
The government commenced this forfeiture action alleging that certain items of jewelry3 seized from Claimant's residence were forfeitable as drug trafficking proceeds. Specifically, the items of jewelry were found alongside two (2) kilograms of cocaine and marijuana at the arrest of Claimant while he was fugitive in Criminal Nos. 10-175 (PG), 11-181 (PG) and 11-367 (PG) (collectively, "Criminal Cases").
On October 18, 2013, Claimant Betancourt-Pérez pled guilty in the Criminal Cases pursuant to a plea agreement. The Sentencing Hearing in all three (3) cases is set for April 11, 2014.
On a date unknown, but no later than in or about the year 2002, and continuing up to and until the return of the Indictment, in the Municipality of Carolina, claimant Betancourt-Pérez, participated in a conspiracy with other persons to knowingly and intentionally possess with intent to distribute controlled substances, that is: in excess of fifty (50) grams of cocaine base (crack), a Schedule II Narcotic Drug Controlled Substance; in excess of one (1) kilogram of heroin, a Schedule I, Narcotic Drug Controlled Substance; in excess of five (5) kilograms of cocaine, a Schedule II, Narcotic Drug Controlled Substance; in excess of one thousand (1,000) kilograms of marijuana, a Schedule I, Controlled Substance; a mixture or substance containing detectable amounts of Oxycodone (commonly known as Percocet), a Schedule II Controlled Substance; and a mixture or substance containing detectable amounts of Alprazolam (commonly known as Xanax), a Schedule IV Controlled Substance; within one thousand (1 ,000) feet of the real property comprising a housing facility owned by a public housing authority. All in violation of Sections 841(a)(1), 846 and 860 of Title 21 of the United States Code.
The object of the conspiracy was to distribute controlled substances at the Torres De Sabana Public Housing Project in Carolina, Puerto Rico and other areas within the Municipality of Carolina and Loiza; all for significant financial gain and profit. ClaimantBetancourt-Pérez, acted as a runner for the drug trafficking organization. As such, he would be responsible for providing sufficient narcotics to the sellers for further distribution at the drug point. He would also be responsible for collecting the proceeds of drug sales and paying the street sellers. Although multiple kilograms of heroin, cocaine, cocaine base and marihuana were distributed during the conspiracy, for the sole purpose of the Plea Agreement, the parties agreed that Betancourt-Pérez was accountable for at least three point five (3.5) kilograms but less than five (5) kilograms of cocaine.
On or about May 10, 2011, at approximately 3:30 p.m., United States Marshals Service Deputies along with Puerto Rico Police Department, Carolina Strike Force Agents were performing surveillance operations at the vicinity of the Montecillo Court Apartment Complex, in Encantada, Trujillo Alto, P.R., upon receiving information on the whereabouts of a federal fugitive. To that date, claimant Betancourt-Pérez was a federal fugitive who had an outstanding arrest warrant in relation to criminal case 10-175 (PG).
At approximately, 4:30 p.m., the agents observed an individual who, while driving a white Ford Econoline Van, bearing license plate number 757-678, entered the Montecillo Court Apartments' parking lot area. After entering into the parking area, the individual proceeded to park the white Van in one of the parking spaces near the vicinity of the Apartment Complex's mail boxes area. At that point, he dismounted from the white Van and walked towards Building 44 of the Apartment Complex, specifically to apartment number 4404. An individual entered the apartment and remained inside for approximately40 minutes. At approximately 5:10 p.m., the above mentioned individual, along with claimant Betancourt-Pérez, came out of apartment 4404 of the residential complex and walked towards the front side of a Toyota Highlander, bearing Puerto Rico license plate GMA-090, that was parked in the assigned parking space for apartment 4404.
The other individual proceeded to move the white color Van from where it was originally parked and placed the same in front of the Highlander. At that point, both vehicles where parked close to each other and their rear doors were opened as to both. Claimant Betancourt-Pérez, at that point was standing right next to the Toyota Highlander with a white medium size box in his hands. Betancourt-Pérez and the other individual placed inside the Van and the Toyota Highlander a total of four (4) white boxes. The boxes were being retrieved by claimant Betancourt-Pérez and the other individual from inside apartment 4404 of the Montecillo Court Apartment Complex.
At that point, the United States Marshal Service and the Puerto Rico Police Department CSF identified Claimant as the federal fugitive that they were looking for and proceeded with his arrest. While performing a limited search of the area of the arrest the agents seized four boxes containing approximately 62 pounds of marihuana. Thereafter, agents from the Drug Enforcement Administration and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives executed a federal search warrant on the premises of apartment 4404 of the Montecillo Court Apartment Complex (Claimant's apartment), resulting in the seizure of approximately 2.185 kilograms of cocaine, a Bushmaster, model Carbon-15, 5.56 caliber pistol, serial number D06007, among other items of evidence. Claimant Betancourt-Pérez, acknowledged that the firearm was used and carried during and in relation to a drug trafficking crime as charged in Count One. For the purposes of the Plea Agreement entered in this case, claimant Betancourt-Pérez acknowledged that he possessed with intent to distribute at least two (2) kilograms but less than three point five (3.5) kilograms of cocaine. All in violation of Section 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B) of Title 21 of the United States Code and Sections 924(c)(1)(A) and 2 of Title 18 of the United States Code.
The search warrant on Betancourt-Perez's apartment also resulted in the seizure of assorted jewelry with the aforementioned cocaine, which was appraised at $44, 328.00.
In or about the year 2010, and continuing up to and until the return of the Indictment filed in this case, in the Districts of Puerto Rico, California, Florida, Mexico and elsewhere, claimant Betancourt-Pérez and other persons, did knowingly and intentionally, combine, conspire, and agree with each other and with diverse other persons known and unknown to the Grand Jury, to commit the following offense against the United States: to possess with the intent to distribute 1000 kilograms or more of a mixture or substance containing detectable amounts of marijuana, a Schedule I Controlled Substance, in violation of Sections 841(a)(1) & (b)(1)(A) of Title 21 of the United States Code.
The object of the conspiracy was to purchase, transport and distribute large amounts of marijuana throughout Puerto Rico, all for significant financial gain and profit. Claimant Betancourt-Pérez acted as a facilitator for the drug trafficking organization. As a facilitator, Betancourt-Pérez would assist and coordinate the process to launder the controlledsubstances proceeds and could facilitate the final distribution of the marijuana within the District of Puerto Rico. Claimant Betancourt-Pérez acknowledged that the conspiracy charged in this case is different, separate, and unrelated to the conspiracy charged in Criminal No. 10-175 (PG).
The court will briefly discuss the government's argument regarding Claimant's lack of standing to challenge the forfeiture. The government contends that Claimant's answer and Verified claim are legally insufficient and that Betancourt-Pérez does not have standing to contest the forfeiture. (Docket No. 44 at pp. 2-13).
As the First Circuit Court of Appeals recently reiterated, "[s]tanding is a threshold consideration in all cases, including civil forfeiture cases." U.S. v. $8,440,190.00 in U.S. Currency, 719 F.3d 49, 57 (1st Cir. June 17, 2013)(citing United States v. One-Sixth Share of James J. Bulger in All Present & Future Proceeds of Mass Millions Lottery Ticket No. M246233, 326 F.3d 36, 40 (1st Cir. 2003)).
In forfeiture cases, the property is the defendant and therefore defenses against forfeiture can only be brought by a third-party intervenor (here, claimant Betancourt-Pérez), who generally must have independent standing. Id. When faced with a motion seeking to strike a claim, the burden is on the party contesting the forfeiture to establish standing by a preponderance of the evidence. Supplemental Rule for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions G(8)(c)(ii)(B). To meet his burden, the claimant muststart by demonstrating an ownership or possessory interest in the seized property. $8,440,190.00 in U.S. Currency, 719 F.3d at 57; see also One-Sixth Share, 326 F.3d at 41. At the initial stages of intervention, the requirements are not arduous and typically "any colorable claim on the defendant property suffices." $8,440,190.00 in U.S. Currency, 719 F.3d at 57 (quoting One-Sixth Share, 326 F.3d at 41); see also U.S. v. U.S. Currency, $81,000, 189 F.3d 28, 35 (1st Cir. ...
Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI
Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting