Case Law United States v. Bartleson

United States v. Bartleson

Document Cited Authorities (100) Cited in Related

74 F.Supp.3d 947

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff
v.
Anthony BARTLESON, Defendant.

No. CR 14–3022–MWB.

United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Central Division.

Signed Feb. 10, 2015.


74 F.Supp.3d 949

Anthony Morfitt, U.S. Attorney's Office, Cedar Rapids, IA, for Plaintiff.

74 F.Supp.3d 950

Todd Michael Lantz, Weinhardt & Logan, PC, Des Moines, IA, for Defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING ABUSE–OF–TRUST ENHANCEMENT

MARK W. BENNETT, District Judge.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION 950
II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND 955
A. Undisputed Facts 955
B. Disputed Facts 956
C. Admissibility of the Department of Labor Report 958
1. Standard for Admissibility of Evidence at Sentencing 959
2. Case Law on “Sufficient Indicia of Reliability” 959
3. DOL Report has “Sufficient Indicia of Reliability” 962
III. DISCUSSION 963
A. Standard for Abuse–of–Trust Enhancement 963
B. Parties' Arguments as to Abuse–of–Trust Enhancement 964
C. Analysis Regarding Abuse–of–Trust Enhancement 966
1. Bartleson Occupied a Position of Private Trust 966
2. Bartleson's Position Facilitated the Commission and Concealment of the Embezzlement 970
3. Enhancement Would Not Cause Double Counting 973
4. Application of Note 5 of the Sentencing Guidelines under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.3 975
a. First Clause of Note 5 976
b. Second Clause of Note 5 979
D. Restitution 983
1. Restitution Should Include Lost Investment Earnings and Tax Liabilities 984
2. Payment Schedule for Restitution 988
IV. CONCLUSION 990
V. APPENDIX 991

I. INTRODUCTION

In this criminal sentencing of a corporate vice president, who embezzled money from thirteen employees' retirement accounts, one of the fighting issues is whether he abused a position of trust. An insightful philosophical work entitled Trust and Antitrust focuses on the risks of bestowing trust upon another.1 The author, Annette Baier, is a moral philosopher and an eminent scholar on the phenomenon of “trust.”2 According to Baier, “Trust ...

74 F.Supp.3d 951
...
1 cases
Document | U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York – 2019
United States v. OZ Africa Mgmt. GP, 16-CR-515 (NGG)
"... ... See, e.g. , United States v. Scott , 321 F. App'x 71, 72 (2d Cir. 2009) (summary order) (affirming restitution order that included an award for subsequent investment gains lost as a result of the theft); United States v. Bartleson , 74 F. Supp. 3d 947, 984-87 (N.D. Iowa 2015) (ordering restitution that included a "reasonable estimate" of victims' "lost investment earnings," based on the Standard & Poor's 500 Stock Index); United States v. Kline , 199 F. Supp. 2d 922, 924-27 (D. Minn. 2002) (ordering restitution for ... "

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
1 cases
Document | U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York – 2019
United States v. OZ Africa Mgmt. GP, 16-CR-515 (NGG)
"... ... See, e.g. , United States v. Scott , 321 F. App'x 71, 72 (2d Cir. 2009) (summary order) (affirming restitution order that included an award for subsequent investment gains lost as a result of the theft); United States v. Bartleson , 74 F. Supp. 3d 947, 984-87 (N.D. Iowa 2015) (ordering restitution that included a "reasonable estimate" of victims' "lost investment earnings," based on the Standard & Poor's 500 Stock Index); United States v. Kline , 199 F. Supp. 2d 922, 924-27 (D. Minn. 2002) (ordering restitution for ... "

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex