Sign Up for Vincent AI
United States v. Burchell, 4:21-cr-40025
Pending before the Court is Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the Indictment (Doc. 28), which the Government resists (Doc. 31). Defendant has been charged with violating 18 U.S.C. § 2250(a) (Doc. 1). The Government alleges Defendant failed to register as a sex offender based on a prior state conviction and traveled in interstate commerce. For the reasons stated herein, the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is granted.
In 1990, Defendant was convicted in the State of Texas for violating Texas Penal Code Ann. § 22.011, prohibiting sexual assault. Defendant pleaded guilty to Count II of the Indictment, alleging Sexual Assault in the Second Degree after a jury failed to reach a verdict. (Doc. 29, Ex C). He was sentenced to a prison term and was required to register as a sex offender. (Id.) The defense claims that Defendant is a Tier I sex offender, and the 15-year term for which he was required to register has expired. The Government alleges that Defendant is a Tier III sex offender who is required to register for life in connection with interstate travel, and that Defendant failed to do so. The problem before the Court is to determine the appropriate Tier for Defendant's offense of conviction and thereby determine whether his failure to register could qualify as an offense under 18 U.S.C. § 2250(a).
At the outset, the Court must address whether the issue presented is one for the jury or for the Court to resolve. Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 12(b)(1) authorizes a party to "raise by pretrial motion any defense, objection, or request that the court can determine without trial on the merits." As a general matter, the Court does not look further than the indictment itself to determine its sufficiency. United States v. Farm & Home Sav. Ass'n, 932 F.2d 1256 1259 n.3 (8th Cir. 1991). Where, as here, the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss raises a legal question, however, it is appropriate for the Court to resolve it in advance of trial. Accord, United States v. Church, 461 F.Supp.3d 875, 881 (S.D. Iowa 2020); United States v. Grant, 2018 WL 4516008 (N.D.Ga. 2018). See also United States v. Laney, 2021 WL 1821188 (N.D. Iowa 2021) report and recommendation adopted, 2021 WL 2373845 (N.D. Iowa, March 26, 2021). In a different context, United States v. Marrowbone, 2014 WL 6694781 (D. S.D. 2014), explained that the rationale for the Court to address such issues pretrial is threefold: the difficulty for a jury in resolving this type of legal question; fairness to the defendant; and wise use of judicial resources. Id. at *2.
The parties agree (Doc. 29 and 31) that this case poses a legal question proper for determination by the Court, and not by the jury. The Court agrees.
The Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act ("SORNA"), 34 U.S.C. §§ 20911-20932, sets forth a comprehensive system for registration by convicted sex offenders, as follows:
The statute further defines a Tier II offender as someone who has committed an offense involving a minor, which is not relevant here. 34 U.S.C. § 20911(3). A Tier I offender is one who does not qualify as either a Tier II or Tier III offender. 34 U.S.C. § 20911(2).
SORNA sets forth the periods of time during which an individual must register as a sex offender as follows:
In addition to requiring registration by sex offenders, SORNA links to the federal criminal code to impose criminal responsibility on offenders who fail to comply. 18 U.S.C. § 2250(a) provides as follows:
To determine whether and at what level an individual qualifies as a sex offender, the Court must examine applicable sections of the federal criminal code, as well as the applicable state code. As provided in SORNA's definition of a Tier III offender, 34 U.S.C. § 20911(4), the pertinent provisions of the United States Code which must be compared with the state code are 18 U.S.C. §§ 2241 and 2242, which read as follows:
shall be fined under this title, imprisoned for any term of years or life, or both.
The task for the Court is to examine these statutes and compare them to the Texas sexual assault statute in effect at the time of Defendant's conviction. At the time, the Texas statute read as follows:
The term "without the consent of the other person" was defined in § 22.011(b) and meant:
Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI
Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting