Case Law United States v. Hopkins

United States v. Hopkins

Document Cited Authorities (10) Cited in Related

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
v.
WILLIAM HOPKINS JR.
Defendant.

17-CR-278
17-CR-293

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

FILED: April 13, 2018
March 27, 2018


Statement of Reasons Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3553(2)

JACK B. WEINSTEIN, Senior United States District Judge:

Parties
Appearances
The United States of America
Kaitlin Farrell
Turner Buford
United States Attorney's Office
271 Cadman Plaza East
Brooklyn, NY 11201
William Hopkins
Michelle Gelernt
Federal Defenders
One Pierrepont Plaza
Brooklyn, NY 11201

Page 2

Table of Contents

I. Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 2

II. Facts ..................................................................................................................................... 3

a. Food Stamp Fraud ............................................................................................................ 3

b. Mail Theft ......................................................................................................................... 4

c. Guilty Plea ........................................................................................................................ 4

d. Victim's Statement ........................................................................................................... 4

e. Sentencing ........................................................................................................................ 5

III. Offense Level, Category, and Sentencing Guidelines Range .......................................... 5

IV. Law ................................................................................................................................... 6

V. 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) Considerations ................................................................................. 7

VI. Conclusion ....................................................................................................................... 8

I. Introduction

William Hopkins, Jr. pled guilty to food stamp fraud and to mail theft at an airport. In effect, he stole from the poor and the well-to-do to pay for his own pleasures.

He is 42 years old. He has no prior criminal conviction and has consistently held lawful employment and tried to support his offspring. Society and Hopkins are better off if he is kept out of prison so he can earn a living, pay restitution and help support his children with money and emotional support. See, e.g., Deborah Pines, Judge Rejects Guidelines in Fraud Sentencing, NYLJ, Jul. 1, 1992 ("Sentences ranged from probation to [various terms of] imprisonment for the defendants who are mainly single mothers from the Dominican Republic who bought, sold and used false identity documents to obtain government funds."). The heavy community service requirement substitutes for incarceration, serving the public rather than burdening the taxpayer. See, e.g., Colby Hamilton, Berman Defends 'Reasonableness' of Community Service Sentence, NYLJ, Mar. 26, 2018; see also U.S.C. § 5F1.3 cmt. n. 1 ("Community service generally should not be imposed in excess of 400 hours.").

Page 3

The minimum guideline for incarceration is eighteen months. Hopkins is sentenced concurrently to four years' probation and three hundred hours of community service. He will pay restitution in the amount of $59,022.24 for food stamp fraud and $13,178 for stolen mail at the rate of %10 of his net earnings. This punishment seems just. See, e.g., Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 48-49 (2007); United States v. Dennison, 493 F. Supp. 2d 139, 140 (D. Me. 2007) (giving special weight to "Congress's evident desire for restitution through working" in place of incarceration); 7 U.S.C. § 2024(b)(2)("[T]he court may permit [a defendant] to perform work approved by the court for the purpose of providing restitution for losses incurred . . . as a result of the [food stamp fraud]. If the court permits such individual to perform such work and such individual agrees thereto, the court shall withhold the imposition of the sentence on the condition that such individual perform the assigned work. Upon the successful completion of the assigned work the court may suspend such sentence."). The court does not withhold imposition of Hopkins' sentence, but takes into account Congressional preference for community work.

II. Facts

William Hopkins, Jr. ("Hopkins") was a custodian at a United States Post Office ("USPS") service center at John F. Kennedy International Airport ("JFK"). Pre-Sentence Report ("PSR") ¶ 9. At the time, his girlfriend and co-defendant, Mahalia Abraham ("Abraham"), worked for the New York City Human Resources Administration. PSR ¶ 8.

a. Food Stamp Fraud

As part of her employment, Abraham had access to names, dates of birth, social security numbers, and electronic benefits transfer ("EBT") card information of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program ("SNAP") recipients. Id.

Page 4

Between July 2014 and April 2016 Abraham provided the information of over 130 SNAP recipients to Hopkins. PSR ¶ 11. Hopkins fraudulently used this information to make purchases and withdraw cash, often delaying the intended beneficiaries from gaining access to food or other essentials. PSR ¶ 12. Abraham and Hopkins...

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex