Case Law United States v. Johnson

United States v. Johnson

Document Cited Authorities (159) Cited in (5) Related

122 F.Supp.3d 272

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff,
v.
Terry S. JOHNSON, in his official capacity as Alamance County Sheriff, Defendant.

No. 1:12cv1349.

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina.

Signed Aug. 7, 2015.


122 F.Supp.3d 280

Michael J. Songer, Anika Gzifa, Jude Volek, Silvia J. Dominguez–Reese, Timothy Mygatt, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff.

S.C. Kitchen, Karlene S. Turrentine, Turrentine Law Firm, PLLC, Raleigh, NC, for Defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

THOMAS D. SCHROEDER, District Judge.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. FINDINGS OF FACT 282
A. Alamance County 282
1. Population and Demographics of Alamance County 282
2. Law Enforcement Challenges in Alamance County 283
B. ACSO and Sheriff Johnson 285
1. The Introduction and Implementation of ICE's 287(g) Program in Alamance County 285
a. 287(g) Program's TFO 286
b. Termination of TFO Position 289
c. Gun Permit Investigations 290
d. ACSO's Processing and Booking Procedures 291
e. Fairness Alamance 294
2. ACSO Arrest Policy and Practice 295
3. Orders to Target Hispanics 297
4. ACSO Checkpoint Policy and Implementation 298
5. ACSO's Stops and Searches 302
a. Particular Stops 302
b. Statistical Evidence 304
i. Dr. John Lamberth 304
ii. Dr. John MacDonald 307
(a) Post–Stop Outcome Study 309
(b) "Hit–Rate" Study 310
iii. Officer Mark Dockery and ACSO Data on Searches Not Incident to Arrest 311
iv. Dr. David Banks 312
(a) ACSO's Checkpoint Siting 313
...
5 cases
Document | U.S. District Court — Middle District of North Carolina – 2021
Nance v. City of Albemarle
"... ... 1:19CV641 United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina. Signed February 16, 2021 520 F.Supp.3d 769 Kirk London ... Johnson , 122 F. Supp. 3d 272, 354 (M.D.N.C. 2015) ; see also Sylvia Dev. Corp. , 48 F.3d at 818–19 ... "
Document | U.S. District Court — District of South Carolina – 2018
United States v. Brandon Michael Council
"... ... " would begin).        Finally, the Court notes that information provided by the Federal Judicial Center7 states in unambiguous terms that "[t]he defendant may attempt to prove any mitigating factor and is not required by statute to give notice of mitigating factors." Molly Treadway Johnson & Laural L. Hooper, Federal Judicial Center, Resource Guide for Managing Capital Cases, Volume I: Federal Death Penalty TrialsPage 8 at 54 (April 2004), https://www.fjc.gov/content/(emphasis added).8II. The Cases Cited by the Government Are Distinguishable        The Government cites the ... "
Document | U.S. District Court — Middle District of North Carolina – 2021
Wilmington Tr., N.A. v. Nat'l Gen. Ins. Co.
"... ... NATIONAL GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. 1:21cv207 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA June 17, 2021 MEMORANDUM OPINION ... It is not the court's obligation to conduct the parties' research, see United States v. Johnson , 122 F. Supp. 3d 272, 346 (M.D.N.C. 2015), but the court should avoid being led to a potentially ... "
Document | U.S. District Court — Middle District of North Carolina – 2021
Mr. Dee's Inc. v. Inmar, Inc.
"... MR. DEE'S INC., et al. Plaintiffs, v. INMAR, INC., et al. Defendants. No. 1:19cv141 United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina September 16, 2021 ... 45-micron sized film”); United States v. Johnson, 122 ... F.Supp.3d 272, 330-36 (M.D. N.C. 2015) (excluding proposed ... expert ... "
Document | U.S. District Court — District of South Carolina – 2018
United States v. Brandon Michael Council
"... ... Most have allowed attorney participation in some form, even if this is not their standard procedure in criminal cases. Most frequently, judges allow attorneys to question the jurors directly, often placing a time limit on the questioning of each juror.Molly Treadway Johnson & Laural L. Hooper, Federal Judicial Center, Resource Guide for Managing Capital Cases, Volume I: Federal Death Penalty Trials at 40 (April 2004), https://www.fjc.gov/content/ (emphasis added). Finally, the Court notes that in United States v. Tsarnaev—a case relied upon by the Government—the ... "

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial
1 books and journal articles
Document | Vol. 73 Núm. 3, March 2021 – 2021
An Empirical Assessment of Pretextual Stops and Racial Profiling.
"...agencies for engaging in a pattern or practice of unlawful or unconstitutional conduct. See, e.g., United States v. Johnson, 122 F. Supp. 3d 272, 331-38 (M.D.N.C. 2015) (describing why the district court ultimately concluded that Dr. John Lamberth's use of an observational study to establis..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
1 books and journal articles
Document | Vol. 73 Núm. 3, March 2021 – 2021
An Empirical Assessment of Pretextual Stops and Racial Profiling.
"...agencies for engaging in a pattern or practice of unlawful or unconstitutional conduct. See, e.g., United States v. Johnson, 122 F. Supp. 3d 272, 331-38 (M.D.N.C. 2015) (describing why the district court ultimately concluded that Dr. John Lamberth's use of an observational study to establis..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
Document | U.S. District Court — Middle District of North Carolina – 2021
Nance v. City of Albemarle
"... ... 1:19CV641 United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina. Signed February 16, 2021 520 F.Supp.3d 769 Kirk London ... Johnson , 122 F. Supp. 3d 272, 354 (M.D.N.C. 2015) ; see also Sylvia Dev. Corp. , 48 F.3d at 818–19 ... "
Document | U.S. District Court — District of South Carolina – 2018
United States v. Brandon Michael Council
"... ... " would begin).        Finally, the Court notes that information provided by the Federal Judicial Center7 states in unambiguous terms that "[t]he defendant may attempt to prove any mitigating factor and is not required by statute to give notice of mitigating factors." Molly Treadway Johnson & Laural L. Hooper, Federal Judicial Center, Resource Guide for Managing Capital Cases, Volume I: Federal Death Penalty TrialsPage 8 at 54 (April 2004), https://www.fjc.gov/content/(emphasis added).8II. The Cases Cited by the Government Are Distinguishable        The Government cites the ... "
Document | U.S. District Court — Middle District of North Carolina – 2021
Wilmington Tr., N.A. v. Nat'l Gen. Ins. Co.
"... ... NATIONAL GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. 1:21cv207 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA June 17, 2021 MEMORANDUM OPINION ... It is not the court's obligation to conduct the parties' research, see United States v. Johnson , 122 F. Supp. 3d 272, 346 (M.D.N.C. 2015), but the court should avoid being led to a potentially ... "
Document | U.S. District Court — Middle District of North Carolina – 2021
Mr. Dee's Inc. v. Inmar, Inc.
"... MR. DEE'S INC., et al. Plaintiffs, v. INMAR, INC., et al. Defendants. No. 1:19cv141 United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina September 16, 2021 ... 45-micron sized film”); United States v. Johnson, 122 ... F.Supp.3d 272, 330-36 (M.D. N.C. 2015) (excluding proposed ... expert ... "
Document | U.S. District Court — District of South Carolina – 2018
United States v. Brandon Michael Council
"... ... Most have allowed attorney participation in some form, even if this is not their standard procedure in criminal cases. Most frequently, judges allow attorneys to question the jurors directly, often placing a time limit on the questioning of each juror.Molly Treadway Johnson & Laural L. Hooper, Federal Judicial Center, Resource Guide for Managing Capital Cases, Volume I: Federal Death Penalty Trials at 40 (April 2004), https://www.fjc.gov/content/ (emphasis added). Finally, the Court notes that in United States v. Tsarnaev—a case relied upon by the Government—the ... "

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex