Sign Up for Vincent AI
United States v. Mata
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION FOR DISPOSITION OF MOTION TO SUPPRESS
In this assault and firearm discharge case, Raul Tomas Mata (Mata) moves to suppress all statements he made in three interviews relating to a house shooting investigation. All three of them sidestepped Miranda. Mata though only made incriminating statements in the third one. Because those statements should be excluded as substantive - but not impeachment - evidence, Mata's suppression motion should be granted in part and denied in part.
Just after 1:00 a.m. on April 29, 2022, 911 received reports of shots fired into a residence in Little Eagle, S.D. that struck a female child. Investigators reviewed surveillance footage and spoke with witnesses, leading them to believe it was a drive-by shooting involving an Impala. At about 2:20 a.m., Bureau of Indian Affairs Special Agent Dustin Dobbs (Dobbs) and another officer located and stopped an Impala matching the description and detained the two occupants for questioning. Mata arrived at the scene of the traffic stop, within the hour, apparently to check on his friends who were in the car. Officers immediately handcuffed him.
A couple of hours afterward, Dobbs and Federal Bureau of Investigation Special Agent Joel Smith (Smith) interviewed Mata in Dobbs's vehicle. Dobbs advised Mata of his Miranda rights. Mata waived them, spoke to agents for about 20-minutes, then invoked his right to remain silent:
Agents subsequently arrested Mata and transported him to the adult correctional facility in Fort Yates, North Dakota. Dobbs secured a search warrant for Mata's DNA, and interviewed Mata a second time at about 6:25 p.m. that same day with Bureau of Indian Affairs Special Agent Sparky Edwards (Edwards) present. After Dobbs read the Miranda warning, Mata invoked his right to remain silent, but agents pushed on:
Leveraging their mutual experience in military service, Edwards then pontificated about the need to locate the gun in hopes of engaging Mata:
Edwards and Dobbs persisted for about four more minutes in an attempt to get Mata to cooperate and “help [him]self out.”[4] Edwards, in particular, talked about coming in to assist a fellow soldier and “brother of mine” and the benefits of cooperating (“especially from somebody in the Armed Forces.”).[5] While Dobbs collected the buccal swab, he and Edwards sought to keep the conversation going:
About two days later, on May 1, 2022, Dobbs interviewed Mata a third time. In this interview, Dobbs prefaced the Miranda warning with nine minutes worth of investigation details and references to an incident involving Braxton Little Dog. Dobbs also alluded to Mata's family possibly being in danger:
From there, Dobbs mentioned talking to Mata's uncle about retaliation and trying to smooth things over with the family before giving the Miranda advisement:
The interview proceeded for 35 more minutes and focused primarily on Little Dog. Eventually, Dobbs asked where the gun was:
After this point, Dobbs described the sweeping nature of a criminal conspiracy and how it puts others at risk and, while doing so, circled back to the peril Mata and his family faced.[10] Although Dobbs paused his questioning, he returned to it with another gun query:
Then, Dobbs wended ahead and asked a bunch more questions, obtaining further information from Mata, before finally ending the interview:
A federal grand jury ultimately indicted Mata and charged him with assault with intent to commit murder, assault with a dangerous weapon, assault resulting in serious bodily injury, and discharge of a firearm during a crime of violence.[13] Mata thereafter moved to suppress the statements he made during the three interviews and the Court held an evidentiary hearing on the motion. During the hearing, Mata conceded that only the third interview contained incriminating statements and that it alone was the one subject to suppression.[14] The government resisted the motion.[15]The Court then took the matter under advisement.[16]
Mata first claims that the statements he made to Dobbs should be suppressed because he invoked his Fifth Amendment right to remain silent. The recording of the third interview shows that after being Mirandized, Mata said he wanted to “remain quiet.” Mata argues that these utterances were sufficient as a matter of law to trigger his right to silence and cut off any questioning of him.
Miranda requires that law enforcement...
Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI
Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting