Case Law United States v. Matheny

United States v. Matheny

Document Cited in Related

Unpublished

Submitted: December 11, 2023

Appeal from United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Cedar Rapids

Before Gruender, Grasz, and Kobes, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Bradley Jon Matheny was convicted of seven counts of forging or counterfeiting postage stamps and three counts of smuggling. See United States v. Matheny, 42 F.4th 837, 840 (8th Cir. 2022). At sentencing, the district court ordered Matheny to pay $256,441.78 in restitution to the United States Postal Service ("USPS"). Id. at 841. We vacated the restitution order and remanded after concluding that the restitution amount must be based solely on the USPS's loss from packages with forged labels. See id. at 845-46. On remand, the district court[1]entered an amended judgment ordering Matheny to pay $192,330.00 in restitution to the USPS representing 75% of the original award. Matheny appeals arguing that the correct amount of restitution is $168,210.78, or 65.6% of the original award.

"We review . . . the district court's factual findings about the amount of loss for clear error." United States v. Garbacz, 33 F.4th 459, 473 (8th Cir. 2022). "The Government has the burden to prove the amount of restitution based on a preponderance of the evidence, and a restitution award is limited to the victim's provable actual loss." Id. (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). "However, a district court is charged only with reasonably estimating the loss when the amount lost through fraud is difficult to estimate." Id. (internal quotation marks omitted).

In calculating the restitution amount, the district court relied on a USPS review of Matheny's packages. Neither party disputes using the USPS review to calculate restitution. During the USPS review, Matheny shipped 2,898 total packages of which 384 were posted correctly, 613 had genuine labels but "underweighted" the package by listing a lighter weight than the package's actual weight, and 1,901 had forged labels-which included an indeterminate number of labels that also underweighted the package. Combined, these 1,901 packages with forged labels and 613 packages with genuine but underweighted labels-2,514 packages altogether-formed the basis for the district court's calculation of the USPS's total loss of $256,441.78. The 1,901 packages with forged labels represented 75.62% of the 2,514 total packages. In reaching its conclusion that the correct amount of restitution was $192,330.00, the district court reduced the restitution amount to 75% of the USPS's total loss. Because the district...

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex