United States v. Siller

32 F.4th 681

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff - Appellee

v.Dakota SILLER, Defendant - Appellant

No. 21-2410

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: April 11, 2022

Filed: April 27, 2022

Kimberly Nicole Harris, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney's Office, Western District of Arkansas, Fort Smith, AR, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Dakota Siller, Fayetteville, AR, Pro Se.

Stevan E. Vowell, Taylor Law Partners, Fayetteville, AR, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before LOKEN, ARNOLD, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.

ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.

After Dakota Siller pleaded guilty to conspiring to launder money for a drug trafficking ring, see 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(1)(B)(i), (h), the district court, in calculating Siller's recommended sentencing range, found that Siller was responsible for more than five hundred grams of drugs. Siller challenges that determination on appeal and says that his recommended sentencing range was too high as a result of the court's error. We agree with Siller that the court's calculation cannot stand, and so we reverse and remand.

There are two factual components to the court's calculation. The first involves an intercepted phone call between Siller and a leader of the conspiracy named Nathan Martin, during which he directed Siller to move three-quarters of a pound (or about 340 grams) of methamphetamine into a safe. The calculation's second component involved four separate wire transfers of one thousand dollars each that Siller says he sent to drug suppliers. To determine how much methamphetamine four thousand dollars would buy, the court had to calculate the drug's price. The presentence investigation report said that the price was two thousand dollars per pound, which meant that Siller was responsible for an additional two pounds of methamphetamine, or roughly 907 grams. When the amounts from both components are added together, that would mean that Siller was responsible for about 1,247 grams.

Siller objected to the PSR's calculation. As to the first component of the calculation, Siller argued that "the facts contained in the PSR are insufficient to demonstrate that the amount alleged even existed, let alone that [he] did, indeed, engage in any actions related thereto." As to the second component, Siller challenged the price of methamphetamine that the PSR recommended. He explained that the evidence showed a price of $4,800 to $6,400 per pound, meaning that he was responsible for only about 378 grams at most.

Siller reiterated these arguments at the sentencing hearing, but as to the part of the calculation involving the intercepted phone call, he added a double-counting argument: He said that "if three-quarters of a pound existed, it could be three-quarters of a pound that he's already being held accountable for for that $4,000." The district court found that Siller was accountable for the 340 grams involved in the intercepted phone call. It rejected Siller's contention that the government failed to prove the drugs referenced in that call actually existed and that Siller was responsible for them, but it did not address Siller's contention that these drugs might be among the drugs that his wire transfers paid for.

The court then turned to Siller's objection to the price of methamphetamine. It recognized that it need not resolve the objection about pricing because, even if Siller's price range were correct, his Guidelines range would not change. Here's why: The Guidelines provide that Siller's base offense level would be 30 if he were deemed responsible for at least 500 grams but less than 1500 grams of methamphetamine. See USSG § 2D1.1(c)(5). After finding Siller responsible for the amount involved in the intercepted phone call (340 grams), the court had to determine the additional amount that the wire transfers made Siller responsible for. Based on the price of methamphetamine, Siller argued he was responsible for an additional 378 grams at most, rather than 907 additional grams. But either number, when added to 340 grams, brought Siller within the range corresponding to a base offense level of 30 because the sum of each is between 500 and 1500 grams (718 grams and 1,247 grams). Siller's Guidelines range was 100–125 months' imprisonment, but had the court...