Case Law Univ. of Kan. Hosp. Auth. v. Bd. of Comm'rs of the Cnty. of Wabaunsee

Univ. of Kan. Hosp. Auth. v. Bd. of Comm'rs of the Cnty. of Wabaunsee

Document Cited Authorities (19) Cited in (16) Related

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Syllabus by the Court

1. Under K.S.A. 19–1910, a county is only obligated to pay for the medical care of an individual who has no resources to pay for his or her own care and who is a prisoner committed to or held in the county jail, meaning someone who has been sentenced to jail; has been arrested and is being detained in jail while awaiting trial; has been apprehended and arrested and would be detained in jail while awaiting trial but for his or her injuries; or has been otherwise committed to jail, such as in a civil commitment proceeding.

2. A county does not receive a benefit and is not unjustly enriched when a healthcare provider treats a person injured within the county's borders unless the county or one of its officers had a legal obligation to provide medical care to that person.

Jennifer Martin Smith, of Topeka, argued the cause, and E. Lou Bjorgaard Probasco, of Probasco & Associates, P.A., of Topeka, was with her on the briefs for appellant.

Norbert C. Marek, Jr., county attorney, argued the cause and was on the brief for appellee.

Nathan Eberline, of Topeka, was on the brief for amicus curiae Kansas Association of Counties.

The opinion of the court was delivered by LUCKERT, J.:

Prior Kansas appellate decisions require a sheriff to provide medical care to a prisoner in the sheriff's custody and a county to pay for the care if the prisoner is indigent and has no other means of payment. Relying on this caselaw, the University of Kansas Hospital Authority (Hospital Authority) sued the Board of Wabaunsee County Commissioners (County) for reimbursement of the medical expenses incurred in the treatment of a man who jumped through the fourth-story window of an unlocked interrogation room in the Wabaunsee County jail where he had been placed by sheriff officials during an investigation.

We hold the County is not obligated to pay the expenses because the injured man, although temporarily detained, was not a prisoner committed to or held in the county jail at the time he was injured and hospitalized.

Facts and Procedural Background

The relevant facts are uncontroverted. This dispute arose on April 5, 2006, when Ector Manuel Savala–Quintero, a/k/a Alberto Contreras Gonzalez, (Contreras) sustained multiple physical injuries after his jump and four-story fall from the Wabaunsee County jail. To explain the circumstances relevant to a determination of whether he was a prisoner in the sheriff's custody at the time he was hospitalized, we begin approximately 1 month earlier, when a Kansas Highway Patrol trooper in Wabaunsee County had arrested Contreras on drug-related charges. While Contreras was in the Wabaunsee County jail awaiting trial, a federal agent with the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) interviewed him over the telephone and then faxed a form I–247 Immigration Detainer to the Wabaunsee County Sheriff's Office. The detainer was not a warrant but required the sheriff's office to detain Contreras for no longer than 48 hours so that ICE would have “adequate time ... to assume custody of the alien.”

On March 21, 2006, Contreras and the Wabaunsee County Attorney entered into a diversion agreement concerning the Wabaunsee County charges. The diversion agreement led to Contreras' release from the Wabaunsee County jail on March 28, 2006. Contreras was immediately taken to the Shawnee County jail on an outstanding warrant. A copy of the ICE detainer was sent with him. Contreras bonded out of the Shawnee County jail on April 5, 2006, and was to appear in court the following day.

On the evening of April 5, 2006, Contreras returned to the Wabaunsee County courthouse to retrieve some personal items he had left at the jail, which is located on the fourth floor of the courthouse. To enter the courthouse building after 5 p.m., a person must “buzz dispatch” to let him or her in. Contreras arrived with his sister and her boyfriend.

Jailer Barbara O'Connor of the Wabaunsee County Sheriff's Office received a call from dispatch around 7:30 p.m., indicating that Contreras was at the courthouse door and wanted to collect his belongings. Before allowing Contreras to enter, O'Connor called her supervisor, Captain Joe Lamb. O'Connor was concerned that Contreras might have escaped from another facility. Captain Lamb also believed that Contreras should still be in jail because of the ‘Federal Hold’ placed on him. He instructed O'Connor to allow only Contreras in the building and to place Contreras in the ‘fingerprint’ room,” which is a room used for fingerprinting, no-contact visitation, and interrogation, until Captain Lamb's arrival at the jail.

Contreras was buzzed into the courthouse and, without escort, rode the elevator to the jail. O'Connor met him there and led him through the secure jail door and to the fingerprint room. Upon placing Contreras in the room, O'Connor left, closing the door behind her, and went to look for Contreras' personal belongings.

O'Connor was the only employee in the jail at the time. Given that situation, the fingerprint room was the most secure location to leave Contreras alone because a security camera fed live video from the room to dispatch. Thus, Contreras could be monitored for any action that would create a security risk to O'Connor or the jail. The door to the fingerprint room, although capable of being locked, was not locked. Nevertheless, to open the door, the door knob had to be turned “in the opposite direction than is customary.” The room did not have bars or any other barriers on the windows.

When Captain Lamb arrived at the jail, he asked Contreras about the status of his Shawnee County warrant and the ICE detainer. Contreras told Captain Lamb he had bonded out on the Shawnee County warrant but simply shrugged his shoulders at the mention of the ICE detainer. Captain Lamb told Contreras to ‘have a seat’ while he checked on Contreras' status. While Contreras was in the room alone, he made two unsuccessful attempts to turn the door knob and then knocked on the door.

Captain Lamb went to the dispatch area to check on Contreras' status. Via the live video feed he saw Contreras pick up a chair, smash a window, and then jump out of the window. Contreras landed on the ground below. Captain Lamb instructed O'Connor to have dispatch call for an ambulance and then ran downstairs.

After Contreras hit the ground, he attempted to get up and run away, but he could not move because his hips were broken. A Wabaunsee County Sheriff's deputy and a Kansas Highway Patrol trooper, who had been dining across the street, responded to the emergency call. When Lamb and the other officers arrived, they saw Contreras on the ground. Contreras' sister was straddling his chest, screaming and crying in Spanish, and her boyfriend approached officers with his hands in his pockets. Because Contreras was a ‘known felon’ and the officers did not know the identities of Contreras' companions, they handcuffed Contreras, his sister, and her boyfriend for the sake of officers' safety until the situation could be assessed. The handcuffs were removed from all three individuals when the medical emergency technicians arrived. By that time, the situation had calmed down, and officers had realized nobody was at risk. The parties agreed that Contreras was never under arrest. But the highway patrol trooper acknowledged that when a person is handcuffed, he or she is detained and not free to leave.

Contreras was transported to the University of Kansas Medical Center (Medical Center) by helicopter, and a copy of the ICE detainer was given to the Medical Center Police Department on April 6, 2006. Captain Lamb told the Medical Center Police Department that Contreras had not been arrested by the Wabaunsee County Sheriff's Office. Nevertheless, Captain Lamb told the Medical Center Police Department that ‘the ICE still had a hold on him and that they should give the Feds a call.’ Wabaunsee County officers had not been able to confirm Contreras' ICE status on April 5, 2006, because Contreras jumped before Captain Lamb could locate his file.

The County did not charge Contreras with any crimes associated with his jump from the fourth-story jail window. While Contreras was in the hospital, there were no guards placed outside his room, and he was not handcuffed or restrained in any way. The only ‘police hold’ referred to in Contreras' medical record was from ICE. When he was released from the hospital, Contreras was not arrested or taken into custody by law enforcement officers. Moreover, the County was not notified of Contreras' release from the hospital. In addition, ICE had no interest in Contreras after he was released from the hospital.

District Court Proceedings

The Hospital Authority sued the County for reimbursement of medical expenses incurred in the treatment of Contreras, alleging four counts. First, the Hospital Authority asserted a claim based on “the statutory right created” under K.S.A.2006 Supp. 22–4612; later in the petition, the Hospital Authority also cited K.S.A. 19–1910. Second, the Hospital Authority alleged the Wabaunsee County Sheriff contracted to pay the expenses when the sheriff “authorized the treatment” of Contreras, who was in the County's custody. In a third count, the Hospital Authority stated: The case law in Kansas is clear that the Defendant–County is responsible for the medical treatment of a person in its custody.” Finally, the Hospital Authority asserted liability on the theory of quantum meruit.

Both the Hospital Authority and the County filed motions for summary judgment. The parties agreed on the applicable legal standard—“a sheriff has a duty to furnish medical attention to a prisoner in his custody who is in need thereof, at the county's expense if...

5 cases
Document | U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit – 2017
Leathers v. Leathers
"... ... v. Capital Homes, L.C. , 279 Kan. 178, 106 P.3d 483, 488 (2005). "The issue of ... 16 See Univ. of Kan. Hosp. Auth. v. Bd. of Comm'rs , 299 ... "
Document | Kansas Court of Appeals – 2015
Creegan v. State
"... ... City of Olathe, 289 Kan. 554, 558, 215 P.3d 561 (2009). In Kansas, the ... See University of Kansas Hosp. Auth. v. Board of Wabaunsee County Comm'rs, 299 ... "
Document | U.S. District Court — District of Kansas – 2018
Tronsgard v. FBL Fin. Grp., Inc., Case No. 17–2393–DDC–JPO
"... ... Wage Payment Act ("KWPA") violations under Kan. Stat. Ann. §§ 44–313 et seq. ; (4) quantum ... that make the retention unjust." Univ. of Kan. Hosp. Auth Auth. v. Bd. of Comm’rs of Cty. of Wabaunsee ... "
Document | Kansas Court of Appeals – 2015
Jahnke v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Kan., Inc.
"...284 Kan. 547, 556–57, 161 P.3d 695 (2007)...; see also [University of Kan. Hosp. Auth. v. Board of Comm'rs of ] Wabaunsee County, 299 Kan. [942] at 957 [327 P.3d 430 (2014) ].... If the plain language of a statute is unambiguous, we do ‘not speculate as to the legislative intent behind it a..."
Document | Kansas Supreme Court – 2015
Univ. of Kan. Hosp. Auth. v. Bd. of Cnty. Comm'rs of the Unified Gov't of Wyandotte Cnty./Kan. City
"... ... 22–4612(a). Our review of this question is unlimited. See University of Kansas Hosp. Auth. v. Board of Wabaunsee County Comm'rs, 299 Kan. 942, 951, 327 P.3d 430 (2014) (hereinafter Wabaunsee County ) (stating that “an unlimited appellate standard of review ... "

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
Document | U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit – 2017
Leathers v. Leathers
"... ... v. Capital Homes, L.C. , 279 Kan. 178, 106 P.3d 483, 488 (2005). "The issue of ... 16 See Univ. of Kan. Hosp. Auth. v. Bd. of Comm'rs , 299 ... "
Document | Kansas Court of Appeals – 2015
Creegan v. State
"... ... City of Olathe, 289 Kan. 554, 558, 215 P.3d 561 (2009). In Kansas, the ... See University of Kansas Hosp. Auth. v. Board of Wabaunsee County Comm'rs, 299 ... "
Document | U.S. District Court — District of Kansas – 2018
Tronsgard v. FBL Fin. Grp., Inc., Case No. 17–2393–DDC–JPO
"... ... Wage Payment Act ("KWPA") violations under Kan. Stat. Ann. §§ 44–313 et seq. ; (4) quantum ... that make the retention unjust." Univ. of Kan. Hosp. Auth Auth. v. Bd. of Comm’rs of Cty. of Wabaunsee ... "
Document | Kansas Court of Appeals – 2015
Jahnke v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Kan., Inc.
"...284 Kan. 547, 556–57, 161 P.3d 695 (2007)...; see also [University of Kan. Hosp. Auth. v. Board of Comm'rs of ] Wabaunsee County, 299 Kan. [942] at 957 [327 P.3d 430 (2014) ].... If the plain language of a statute is unambiguous, we do ‘not speculate as to the legislative intent behind it a..."
Document | Kansas Supreme Court – 2015
Univ. of Kan. Hosp. Auth. v. Bd. of Cnty. Comm'rs of the Unified Gov't of Wyandotte Cnty./Kan. City
"... ... 22–4612(a). Our review of this question is unlimited. See University of Kansas Hosp. Auth. v. Board of Wabaunsee County Comm'rs, 299 Kan. 942, 951, 327 P.3d 430 (2014) (hereinafter Wabaunsee County ) (stating that “an unlimited appellate standard of review ... "

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex