Sign Up for Vincent AI
Vaziri v. Health
Akram Vaziri, the self-represented plaintiff, filed an employment discrimination action against her former employer, "Levindale Hospital/Life Bridge Health." ECF 1 (Complaint).1 Plaintiff alleges discrimination on the basis of her national origin (Iran); religion (Muslim); age (58 years); and disability (diabetes and her daughter's "generalized anxiety disorder"). Id. In particular, plaintiff claims that she was denied training, denied a preferable shift at Levindale, and ultimately terminated as a result of discrimination and in retaliation for filing a discrimination complaint. Id.
Suit was filed on June 6, 2017, pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ("Title VII"), as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-2000e-17; the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 ("ADEA"), as amended, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634; and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 ("ADA"), as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12112-12117. ECF 1 at 5. Defendants moved to dismiss most of plaintiff's claims, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). ECF 5. By Memorandum (ECF 18) and Order of March 8, 2018 (ECF 19), I dismissed LifeBridge as a defendant and dismissed plaintiff's claims for religious discrimination, national origin discrimination, age discrimination, and disability discrimination, all without prejudice. However, I denied defendants' motion as to plaintiff's retaliation claim. I also granted plaintiff leave to file an Amended Complaint.
Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint against Levindale and LifeBridge (ECF 20 at 1-8), with numerous exhibits (ECF 20 at 9-26; ECF 20-1).2 The Amended Complaint largely duplicates the claims that were asserted in the initial Complaint. See ECF 20 at 1-8.
Thereafter, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1), 12(b)(6), and 56, defendants filed a "Motion to Dismiss, or, Alternatively, Motion for Summary Judgment" (ECF 24), supported by a memorandum of law (ECF 24-1) (collectively, the "Motion") and several exhibits. ECF 24-3 - ECF 24-10. They contend that the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction in regard to Vaziri's religion and disability discrimination claims. ECF 24-1 at 19-20. And, they maintain that the Amended Complaint fails to state claims for discrimination based on national origin and age. Id. at 21-24. Defendants also assert that plaintiff's retaliation claim fails as a matter of law. Id. at 25-28.
Vaziri opposes the Motion (ECF 28, the "Opposition"), supported by twenty-four exhibits. ECF 28-2 - ECF 28-25. In her Opposition, she "remove[d]" her claims of discrimination with respect to "disability, national origin and religion." See ECF 28 at 1. But, she seeks to pursue her claims based on retaliation and age discrimination. Id. Defendants have filed a reply (ECF 36), with numerous exhibits. ECF 36-2 - ECF 36-19.
Vaziri has also moved for leave to file a surreply. ECF 37 ("Motion for Surreply"). Defendants did not respond, and the time to do so has passed. See Local Rule 105.2(a).
No hearing is necessary to resolve the motions. See Local Rule 105.6. For the reasons that follow, the Motion for Surreply (ECF 37) shall be denied, and the Motion (ECF 24) shall be granted in part and denied in part.
Vaziri asserts that she is now 58 years old, and has "almost 39 years of experience as a registered Nurse", in areas such as "Medical surgical, Intensive Care Unit, Emergency Room, IV Therapy, Hemodialysis, Pediatric, Inservice Educator, College Instructor, manager and Nursing Supervisor." ECF 1 at 4, 5. On March 21, 2011, she began her employment with LifeBridge, as a Nursing Supervisor at the Levindale Hospital ("Levindale") location. ECF 20, ¶ 1.3 According to Vaziri, during her tenure at Levindale she "was employed and paid by [L]ifeBridge [H]ealth . . . ." Id; see also id. at 8. She asserts: "Every aspect of [Levindale] was controlled by [LifeBridge]." Id. at 7-8.
Over the course of Vaziri's employment, "on numerous occasions [she] reported wrongdoing of some of the employees" to her supervisor, Virginia Saunders. Id. ¶ 2. Those employees include Rita Chikeka, a day-shift supervisor; Maria Cohen, a night-shift supervisor; and Tulasy Surrendran, a night-shift supervisor. Id. ¶¶ 2-3.
Plaintiff claims that Saunders "provoked" the other employees against Vaziri, as they "became nasty, and disrespectful, and non-cooperative with [Vaziri]." Id. ¶ 3. For example, the employees would talk in their native languages "about [her] and make[] fun of [her] daughter's sickness." Id. ¶ 4. Vaziri says that she "felt isolated and lonely because of their behaviors." Id.
Vaziri reported "the issue" with Saunders to Candace Hamner, Vice President and Chief Nursing Officer of Levindale, as well as to John Robison, the Administrator of Levindale. Id. ¶ 5. In an email to Hammer of June 30, 2014 (ECF 28-4), Vaziri stated, in relevant part, id. at 2:
. . . Staff do not listen to me because I report to [Saunders] that is the way of her reaction toward me. she put me down in front of others trough [sic] the E mail. How she is expecting staff to follow me when there is no support from her. I do not know what I did wrong that she thinks I deserve to be treated like this? I am a RN with 35 years of experience in different units and different specialty [sic]. whatever I apply for any position, she do[es] not offer me the position but they offer it [to] Rita or [an]other person that their qualification and experience is less than me.
Vaziri also asserts that her twelve-year-old daughter suffers from "generalized anxiety disorder," and that she requested a day shift position so that she could be home with her daughter at night. ECF 20 at 2. Vaziri complains that Saunders denied this request and "preferred to choose younger, less experience[d] employees." Id. Those employees included Irene Burk, "an interim unit manager" who "later became [a] permanent unit manager" but initially had no "Manager or Supervisory experience"; Maria Cohen, a "Unit Manager"; Vashtie Archer, a "newly graduated" nurse with no nursing or supervisory experience, who "was hired for [a] day shift supervisory position"; and Crystal Henry, "who was young and [had] no supervisory experience" but "was hired for [a] day shift supervisor position." Id. at 2-3.
According to Vaziri, a "day shift Nursing Supervisor" requires "less qualifications compared to [the] night shift." Id. at 4. As a result, she "did not understand which qualification [she] was lacking, compared to those young[er] employees who were chosen for day shift positions." Id. During her tenure at Levindale, Vaziri claims that "there was no any [sic] evidence or incident report against [her]." Id. She avers: "Nothing wrong happened to any residents or patients during my duty." Id. at 3.
On an unspecified date in 2015, Vaziri switched shifts with Ebinizer Akintola, a day shift supervisor. Id. at 4. During a morning meeting that day, Vaziri alleges that Saunders and Michelle Preston, the Director of Nursing at Levindale, "were very mean to [her] and did not look in [her] eyes even one time, did not talk or communicate" with her, but "were very nice to other people and staff." Id. "Their behavior made [her] very sad," and she "went to the supervisor's office and . . . cried." Id.
Vaziri then "reported this behavior" to Human Resources Director Gina Dembeck. Id. In an email to Dembeck on July 29, 2015, Vaziri wrote, ECF 28-17:
In an email of September 4, 2015 (ECF 28-6) to Idriz Limaj, the Chief Operating Officer of LifeBridge, Vaziri wrote, in pertinent part:
In August 2015, Preston conducted Vaziri's "annual performance appraisal" (ECF 24-5, "2015 Appraisal"), "which was shared with [Vaziri] on September 4, 2015." ECF 24-3 ("Preston Affidavit"), ¶ 6. "Vaziri received an overall ranking of 'Needs Improvement,' the lowest possible ranking." Id. "Among the more significant performance deficiencies" that Preston identified were Vaziri's "unfamiliarity with documenting and implementing patient care." Id. ¶ 7.
Additionally, Preston "had concerns about . . . Vaziri's professionalism." Id. ¶ 8. Preston explained: ECF 24-5 at 2. Further, Preston observed, id. at 3: ...
Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI
Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting