Case Law Veasey v. Abbott

Veasey v. Abbott

Document Cited Authorities (192) Cited in (245) Related

Chad Wilson Dunn, Esq., Brazil & Dunn, Houston, TX, Neil G. Baron, Dickinson, TX, Joshua James Bone, J. Gerald Hebert, Esq., Danielle Marie Lang, Campaign Legal Center, Washington, DC, Armand G. Derfner, Esq., Derfner & Altman, L.L.C., Charleston, SC, J. Gerald Hebert, Esq., Alexandria, VA, for PlaintiffsAppellees Marc Veasey, Jane Hamilton, Sergio Deleon, Floyd Carrier, Anna Burns, Michael Montez, Penny Pope, Oscar Ortiz, Koby Ozias, League of United Latin American Citizens, Ken Gandy, Gordon Benjamin, and John Mellor–Crummey.

Erin Helene Flynn, Esq., Anna Marks Baldwin, Diana Katherine Flynn, Robert Acheson Koch, Christine Anne Monta, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Rights Div. —Appellate Section, Washington, DC, John Albert Smith, III, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney's Office, Southern District of Texas, Corpus Christi, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee United States of America.

Sherrilyn Ann Ifill, Leah Camille Aden, Esq., Natasha M. Korgaonkar, Esq., Janai S. Nelson, Esq., Deuel Ross, Christina A. Swarns, NAACP, Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc., New York, NY, Kelly Patrick Dunbar, Sonya Ludmilla Lebsack, WilmerHale, Washington, DC, for Intervenor PlaintiffsAppellees Imani Clark and Texas League of Young Voters Education Fund.

Rolando Leo Rios, I, Esq., Law Office of Rolando L. Rios, San Antonio, TX, for Intervenor PlaintiffAppellee Texas Association of Hispanic County Judges and County Commissioners.

Ezra D. Rosenberg, Esq., Jon Marshall Greenbaum, Esq., Director, Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, Washington, DC, Amy Lynne Rudd, Senior Litigating Attorney, Lindsey Beth Cohan, Dechert, L.L.P., Austin, TX, Preston Edward Henrichson, Esq., Law Offices of Preston Henrichson, P.C., Edinburg, TX, Myrna Perez, Deputy Director, NYU School of Law, Brennan Center for Justice, New York, NY, Rolando Leo Rios, I, Esq., Law Office of Rolando L. Rios, San Antonio, TX, for Intervenor PlaintiffAppellee Mexican American Legislative—Caucus, Texas House of Representatives.

Ezra D. Rosenberg, Esq., Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, Washington, DC, Amy Lynne Rudd, Senior Litigating Attorney, Lindsey Beth Cohan, Dechert, L.L.P., Austin, TX, Vishal Agraharkar, Jennifer Clark, Myrna Perez, Deputy Director, NYU School of Law, Brennan Center for Justice, New York, NY, for PlaintiffAppellee Texas State Conference of NAACP Branches.

Robert Wayne Doggett, Texas RioGrande Legal Aid, Incorporated, Austin, TX, Jose Garza, San Antonio, TX, Marinda van Dalen, Texas RioGrande Legal Aid, Incorporated, Brownsville, TX, for PlaintiffsAppellees Estela Garcia Espinosa, Lionel Estrada, La Union Del Pueblo Entero, Incorporated, Margarito Martinez Lara, Maximina Martinez Lara, Eulalio Mendez, Jr., and Lenard Taylor.

Chad Wilson Dunn, Esq., Brazil & Dunn, Houston, TX, Danielle Marie Lang, Campaign Legal Center, Washington, DC, for PlaintiffAppellee Evelyn Brickner.

Scott A. Keller, Solicitor, J. Campbell Barker, Deputy Solicitor General, Matthew Hamilton Frederick, Deputy Solicitor General, Prerak Shah, Senior Counsel, Office of the Solicitor General for the State of Texas, Austin, TX, for DefendantsAppellants Greg Abbott, Carlos Cascos, State of Texas, and Steve McCraw.

Lawrence John Joseph, Washington, DC, for Amicus Curiae Eagle Forum Education and Legal Defense Fund.

Charles Justin Cooper, Cooper & Kirk, P.L.L.C., Washington, DC, for Amicus Curiae Lawrence Crews.

Elizabeth Bonnie Wydra, Chief Counsel, Constitutional Accountability Center, Washington, DC, for Amicus Curiae Constitutional Accountability Center.

Daniel B. Kohrman, Senior Attorney, AARP Foundation Litigation, Washington, DC, for Amicus Curiae American Association of Retired Persons.

William Consovoy, Consovoy McCarthy Park, P.L.L.C., Arlington, VA, for Amicus Curiae Project on Fair Representation.

Andrew M. Leblanc, Esq., Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy, L.L.P., Washington, DC, for Amici Curiae LatinoJustice PRLDEF, National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials Educational Fund, Hispanic Federation, Hispanic National Bar Association, Mi Familia Vota Education Fund, and Voto Latino.

Martin Jonathan Siegel, Law Office of Martin J. Siegel. P.C., Houston, TX, for Amici Curiae Mark White, Dana Debeauvoir, Oscar Villarreal, and Carolyn Guidry.

Steven James Lechner, Esq., Mountain States Legal Foundation, Lakewood, CO, for Amicus Curiae Mountain States Legal Foundation.

Stuart Kyle Duncan, Schaerr Duncan, L.L.P., Washington, DC, for Amicus Curiae Twenty–Seven U.S. Senators and Representatives from Texas.

Thomas Molnar Fisher, Solicitor General, Office of the Attorney General for the State of Indiana, Indianapolis, IN, for Amicus Curiae States of Indiana, Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Georgia, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Nevada, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Utah, West Virginia, and Wisconsin.

Dale Edwin Ho, Director, Sean Young, American Civil Liberties Union Foundation, Voting Rights Project, New York, NY, Rebecca L. Robertson, Attorney, American Civil Liberties Union of Texas, Houston, TX, for Amici Curiae American Civil Liberties Union and American Civil Liberties of Texas.

Marc Rotenberg, Alan Butler, Caitriona Fitzgerald, Aimee Thomson, Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC), Washington, DC, for Amicus Curiae Electronic Privacy Information Center.

Before STEWART, Chief Judge, and JOLLY, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DENNIS, CLEMENT, PRADO, OWEN, ELROD, SOUTHWICK, HAYNES, GRAVES, HIGGINSON, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

HAYNES, Circuit Judge, joined by STEWART, Chief Judge, and DAVIS, PRADO, SOUTHWICK, GRAVES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges, in full; DENNIS and COSTA, Circuit Judges, joining in all but Part II.A.1 and concurring in the judgment.1

In 2011, Texas (the State) passed Senate Bill 14 (SB 14”), which requires individuals to present one of several forms of photo identification in order to vote. See Act of May 16, 2011, 82d Leg., R.S., ch. 123, 2011 Tex. Gen. Laws 619. Plaintiffs filed suit challenging the constitutionality and legality of the law. The district court held that SB 14 was enacted with a racially discriminatory purpose, has a racially discriminatory effect, is a poll tax, and unconstitutionally burdens the right to vote. See Veasey v. Perry , 71 F.Supp.3d 627, 633 (S.D. Tex. 2014). The State appealed from that decision, and a panel of our court affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded the case for further findings. See Veasey v. Abbott , 796 F.3d 487, 493 (5th Cir. 2015), reh'g en banc granted , 815 F.3d 958 (5th Cir. 2016). The State filed a petition for this court to rehear the case en banc, which we granted.

I. Background
A. Senate Bill 14

Prior to the implementation of SB 14, a Texas voter could cast a ballot in person by presenting a registration certificate—a document mailed to voters upon registration. Tex. Elec. Code §§ 13.142, 63.001(b) (West 2010). Voters appearing without the certificate could cast a ballot by signing an affidavit and presenting one of multiple forms of identification (“ID”), including a current or expired driver's license, a photo ID (including employee or student IDs), a utility bill, a bank statement, a paycheck, a government document showing the voter's name and address, or mail addressed to the voter from a government agency. Id. §§ 63.001, 63.0101 (West 2010).

With the implementation of SB 14, Texas began requiring voters to present certain specific forms of identification at the polls. These include: (1) a Texas driver's license or personal identification card issued by the Department of Public Safety (“DPS”) that has not been expired for more than 60 days; (2) a U.S. military identification card with a photograph that has not been expired for more than 60 days; (3) a U.S. citizenship certificate with a photo; (4) a U.S. passport that has not been expired for more than 60 days; (5) a license to carry a concealed handgun issued by DPS that has not been expired for more than 60 days; or (6) an Election Identification Certificate (“EIC”) issued by DPS that has not been expired for more than 60 days.2 Tex. Elec. Code § 63.0101 (West Supp. 2014).3

SB 14 states that DPS “may not collect a fee for an [EIC] or a duplicate [EIC],” Tex. Transp. Code § 521A.001(b) (West 2013), and allows DPS to promulgate rules for obtaining an EIC, id. § 521A.001(f) ; § 521.142. To receive an EIC, DPS rules require a...

5 cases
Document | U.S. District Court — Western District of Texas – 2017
Perez v. Abbott
"...created socioeconomic disparities, which hinder minority voters' general participation in the political process." Veasey v. Abbott, 830 F.3d 216, 261 (5th Cir. 2016). It is undisputed that Latino voter turnout in CD23 in 2010 was low. Tr509, Tr514 (Engstrom); Engstrom Corr. Rebuttal Report ..."
Document | U.S. District Court — District of Utah – 2016
Navajo Nation Human Rights Comm'n v. San Juan Cnty.
"..., 768 F.3d 524, 554 (6th Cir. 2014), vacated on other grounds , 2014 WL 10384647 (6th Cir. 2014) (unpublished); Veasey v. Abbott , 830 F.3d 216, 244–45 (5th Cir. 2016) ; League of Women Voters v. North Carolina , 769 F.3d 224, 240 (4th Cir. 2014). The Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Circuits artic..."
Document | U.S. District Court — Northern District of Florida – 2021
Florida State Conference of NAACP v. Lee
"...Moreover, while this Court acknowledges the issues attendant with relying on opposing legislators' statements, see Veasey v. Abbott , 830 F.3d 216, 233 (5th Cir. 2016) ("[T]he district court mistakenly relied in part on speculation by the bill's opponents about proponents' motives (rather t..."
Document | U.S. District Court — Southern District of Texas – 2022
Johnson v. Waller Cnty.
"...of the members of the minority group to register, to vote, or otherwise to participate in the democratic process." Veasey v. Abbott , 830 F.3d 216, 245 (5th Cir. 2016), citing Gingles , 478 U.S. at 36–37, 106 S.Ct. 2752, in turn citing S Rep No 97-417 at 28–29 (1982). The parties submitted ..."
Document | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit – 2021
Rollerson v. Brazos River Harbor Navigation Dist. of Brazoria Cnty. Tex.
"...history, especially where there are contemporary statements by members of the decision-making body." Veasey v. Abbott , 830 F.3d 216, 231 (5th Cir. 2016) (en banc) (plurality opinion) (quoting Overton v. City of Austin , 871 F.2d 529, 540 (5th Cir. 1989) ). These factors are not exhaustive,..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial
5 books and journal articles
Document | Núm. 58-3, July 2021 – 2021
ELECTION LAW VIOLATIONS
"...part, judgment rendered in part by 830 F.3d 216 (5th Cir. 2016). 481. Veasey v. Abbott, 796 F.3d 487 (5th Cir. 2015), modif‌ied on reh’g, 830 F.3d 216 (5th Cir. 2016). 482. Veasey v. Abbott, 830 F.3d 216 (5th Cir. 2016) (en banc). 483. Id. at 265–66. 484. Id. at 264–65. 485. Id. at 242–43. ..."
Document | Núm. 59-3, July 2022 – 2022
Election Law Violations
"...71 F. Supp. 3d 627, 627 (S.D. Tex. 2014), aff’d in part, rev’d in part, vacated in part, remanded in part, judgment rendered in part by 830 F.3d 216 (5th Cir. 2016). 489. Veasey v. Abbott, 796 F.3d 487 (5th Cir. 2015), modif‌ied on reh’g , 830 F.3d 216 (5th Cir. 2016). 490. Veasey v. Abbott..."
Document | Vol. 132 Núm. 5, March 2023 – 2023
Reviving the Prophylactic VRA: Section 3, Purcell, and the New Vote Denial.
"...Bail-in is further limited in that courts have historically implemented bail-in judiciously... ."). (123.) See, e.g., Veasey v. Abbott, 830 F.3d 216, 229 (5th Cir. 2016) (vacating the district court's constitutional findings under "the doctrine of constitutional avoidance"); see abo McCrory..."
Document | Núm. 79-3, April 2019 – 2019
Equal Voting Rights Require Removing Race and Partisan Discrimination from Elections and Legislative Gerrymandering
"...Shelby Strategy: Exposing Discriminatory Intent In Voting Rights Litigation , 127 YALE L.J. F. 779, 780 (2018) (citing Veasey v. Abbott, 830 F.3d 216, 241 (5th Cir. 2016) (remanding a 786 LOUISIANA LAW REVIEW [Vol. 79 setting of voting rights litigation virtually always generate the issue o..."
Document | Núm. 39-3, March 2023
Degrees of Losing: a Challenge to the Federal "frozen Benefit Rule"
"...not merely 'in spite of,' its adverse effects upon an identifiable group.").95. See City of Cleburne, 473 U.S. at 441; Veasey v. Abbott, 830 F.3d 216, 231 (5th Cir. 2016) ("We recognize that evaluating motive [to discriminate against a specified group], particularly the motive of dozens of ..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 books and journal articles
Document | Núm. 58-3, July 2021 – 2021
ELECTION LAW VIOLATIONS
"...part, judgment rendered in part by 830 F.3d 216 (5th Cir. 2016). 481. Veasey v. Abbott, 796 F.3d 487 (5th Cir. 2015), modif‌ied on reh’g, 830 F.3d 216 (5th Cir. 2016). 482. Veasey v. Abbott, 830 F.3d 216 (5th Cir. 2016) (en banc). 483. Id. at 265–66. 484. Id. at 264–65. 485. Id. at 242–43. ..."
Document | Núm. 59-3, July 2022 – 2022
Election Law Violations
"...71 F. Supp. 3d 627, 627 (S.D. Tex. 2014), aff’d in part, rev’d in part, vacated in part, remanded in part, judgment rendered in part by 830 F.3d 216 (5th Cir. 2016). 489. Veasey v. Abbott, 796 F.3d 487 (5th Cir. 2015), modif‌ied on reh’g , 830 F.3d 216 (5th Cir. 2016). 490. Veasey v. Abbott..."
Document | Vol. 132 Núm. 5, March 2023 – 2023
Reviving the Prophylactic VRA: Section 3, Purcell, and the New Vote Denial.
"...Bail-in is further limited in that courts have historically implemented bail-in judiciously... ."). (123.) See, e.g., Veasey v. Abbott, 830 F.3d 216, 229 (5th Cir. 2016) (vacating the district court's constitutional findings under "the doctrine of constitutional avoidance"); see abo McCrory..."
Document | Núm. 79-3, April 2019 – 2019
Equal Voting Rights Require Removing Race and Partisan Discrimination from Elections and Legislative Gerrymandering
"...Shelby Strategy: Exposing Discriminatory Intent In Voting Rights Litigation , 127 YALE L.J. F. 779, 780 (2018) (citing Veasey v. Abbott, 830 F.3d 216, 241 (5th Cir. 2016) (remanding a 786 LOUISIANA LAW REVIEW [Vol. 79 setting of voting rights litigation virtually always generate the issue o..."
Document | Núm. 39-3, March 2023
Degrees of Losing: a Challenge to the Federal "frozen Benefit Rule"
"...not merely 'in spite of,' its adverse effects upon an identifiable group.").95. See City of Cleburne, 473 U.S. at 441; Veasey v. Abbott, 830 F.3d 216, 231 (5th Cir. 2016) ("We recognize that evaluating motive [to discriminate against a specified group], particularly the motive of dozens of ..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
Document | U.S. District Court — Western District of Texas – 2017
Perez v. Abbott
"...created socioeconomic disparities, which hinder minority voters' general participation in the political process." Veasey v. Abbott, 830 F.3d 216, 261 (5th Cir. 2016). It is undisputed that Latino voter turnout in CD23 in 2010 was low. Tr509, Tr514 (Engstrom); Engstrom Corr. Rebuttal Report ..."
Document | U.S. District Court — District of Utah – 2016
Navajo Nation Human Rights Comm'n v. San Juan Cnty.
"..., 768 F.3d 524, 554 (6th Cir. 2014), vacated on other grounds , 2014 WL 10384647 (6th Cir. 2014) (unpublished); Veasey v. Abbott , 830 F.3d 216, 244–45 (5th Cir. 2016) ; League of Women Voters v. North Carolina , 769 F.3d 224, 240 (4th Cir. 2014). The Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Circuits artic..."
Document | U.S. District Court — Northern District of Florida – 2021
Florida State Conference of NAACP v. Lee
"...Moreover, while this Court acknowledges the issues attendant with relying on opposing legislators' statements, see Veasey v. Abbott , 830 F.3d 216, 233 (5th Cir. 2016) ("[T]he district court mistakenly relied in part on speculation by the bill's opponents about proponents' motives (rather t..."
Document | U.S. District Court — Southern District of Texas – 2022
Johnson v. Waller Cnty.
"...of the members of the minority group to register, to vote, or otherwise to participate in the democratic process." Veasey v. Abbott , 830 F.3d 216, 245 (5th Cir. 2016), citing Gingles , 478 U.S. at 36–37, 106 S.Ct. 2752, in turn citing S Rep No 97-417 at 28–29 (1982). The parties submitted ..."
Document | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit – 2021
Rollerson v. Brazos River Harbor Navigation Dist. of Brazoria Cnty. Tex.
"...history, especially where there are contemporary statements by members of the decision-making body." Veasey v. Abbott , 830 F.3d 216, 231 (5th Cir. 2016) (en banc) (plurality opinion) (quoting Overton v. City of Austin , 871 F.2d 529, 540 (5th Cir. 1989) ). These factors are not exhaustive,..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex